Agency Budget Statements - DETYA - Section 2 - Outcome 3
OUTCOME 3 AND
CONTRIBUTING OUTPUTS
An organisation chart
showing Outcome 2 and
Contributing Outputs is available.
You need Acrobat Reader to read the PDF file.
Free Acrobat PDF reader software is available for downloading from
the DETYA ftp site
OUTCOME 3
Australian institutions advance the knowledge
base, contribute to the national innovation system and participate effectively in the
global development of knowledge and skills.
Return
to the Top of the Page
DESCRIPTION
Commonwealth investment in higher education
research and research training supports the development of the new knowledge and
innovation necessary to stimulate the new business development and jobs growth on which
Australias prosperity and living standards depend. It encourages universities to be
active partners with enterprises and other research organisations, facilitating the flow
of knowledge, people and expertise both locally and internationally. Specific investment
in research training, one of the vital functions of the higher education system, ensures
the growth of the trained researcher workforce and the ongoing transfer of knowledge and
technique.
The Government remains committed to fostering
opportunities for Australians in the international community through its support of
international education and training initiatives. Its leadership in the global development
of skills and knowledge contributes to the recognition of Australia as a culturally,
scientifically, technologically and intellectually sophisticated country.
Return
to the Top of the Page
MEASURES DISCLOSED IN
THE 2000-01 BUDGET AFFECTING OUTCOME 3
Increased funding for the Research Infrastructure
Equipment and Facilities Scheme
The Government will provide additional ongoing
funding for the Research Infrastructure Equipment and Facilities (RIEF) Scheme to boost
base funding to $24.6 million per annum from 2001. The RIEF Scheme funds large items of
research infrastructure for collaborative use by universities, research organisations and
industry and supports access by Australian researchers to major national and international
research facilities.
These additional funds will further promote
private investment in Australias research infrastructure, while universities,
research organisations and industry partners contribute at least 25 per cent of the cost
of equipment and facilities acquired under the Scheme.
Strategic Partnerships with Industry Research and
Training Scheme
The Government will maintain current funding
levels for the Strategic Partnerships with Industry Research Training (SPIRT) Scheme on an
ongoing basis, providing $13.0 million in 2001-02, $24.7 million in 2002-03 and $25.1
million in 2003-04. Provision for this funding has already been included in the Forward
Estimates. This measure extends the Governments 1998 election commitment to provide
additional funding for SPIRT for a three-year period, and provides ongoing base funding of
$56.8 million per calendar year.
The Scheme aims to improve links between
universities and industry by supporting collaborative research projects undertaken to
acquire new knowledge and by providing awards and fellowships for training in industrial
settings. The Scheme leverages substantial financial contributions from industry partners
that, at a minimum, match Commonwealth funding.
Grant to the Australian-American Education (Fulbright)
Foundation
The Government will provide a one-off grant of
$0.2 million in 2000-01 to the Australian-American Education (Fulbright) Foundation
for the purchase of office space for its headquarters. This grant is additional to the
Commonwealths annual contribution of $0.5 million to assist with the
Foundations education and scholarship programmes, and complements a one-off
contribution of $0.4 million from the government of the United States of America for
the Foundations accommodation.
This measure is being fully absorbed within
existing resourcing of the Department.
Education Services for Overseas Students
increased registration fees for education providers - Revenue
The Department maintains the Commonwealth
Register of Institutions and Courses for Overseas Students (CRICOS), which is a register
of providers of education and training services for overseas students. All such providers
are required to be registered on CRICOS, and pay annual registration fees. The Government
and decided to increase these annual fees in the context of its decision to take a more
active role in the regulation and registration of the education export industry. The
amount of the increase to an individual provider will be dependent upon the number of
overseas students enrolled.
Education Services for Overseas Students strengthening
the regulatory framework Expense
The Education Services Overseas Students
(Registration of Providers and Financial Regulation) (ESOS) Act 1991 will be amended
to strengthen the regulatory framework for the provision of education services for
overseas students, including the establishment of a fidelity fund for overseas student
providers. This will enable the Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs to
take a much more active role in the investigation, monitoring and pursuit of
non-compliance by providers of education services.
Return
to the Top of the Page
RESOURCES FOR
OUTCOME 3
Table 2.1.3 shows total resourcing for Outcome
3, including Total Administered Expenses, Revenue from Government (Appropriation) for
Outputs, Revenue from other sources and the Total Price of Outputs. Cell references C3, E3
and J3 show the links back to Table 1.1
,
the Appropriations Table.
You need Acrobat Reader 3.0 to read the PDF file.
Free Acrobat PDF reader software is available for downloading from
the DETYA ftp site
Table 2.1.3 Total Resources for Outcome
3 ($000)
Outcome 3 - Australian institutions advance
the knowledge base, contribute to the national innovation system and participate
effectively in the global development of knowledge and skills - Australian institutions advance
the knowledge base, contribute to the national innovation system and participate
effectively in the global development of knowledge and skills
| Administered
Appropriations (Further detail at
Appendix 4) |
Estimated
Actual
1999-2000
$000 |
Budget
Estimate
2000-01
$000 |
| Block Funding
higher education research and research training |
242,355 |
222,114 |
| Competitive
Research Schemes |
210,072 |
239,295 |
| Internationalisation
of Australian education and training |
18,200 |
8,039 |
Total
Administered Expenses |
470,627 |
469,448
(J3) |
| Departmental
Appropriations |
|
|
| Output Group 3.1 -
Block Funding higher education research and research training |
2,373 |
3,224 |
| Output Group 3.2 -
Competitive Research Schemes |
7,958 |
9,216 |
| Output Group 3.3 -
Internationalisation of Australian education and training |
24,845 |
25,558 |
|
|
|
Total
Revenue from Government (Appropriation) Contributing to Price of Departmental Output |
35,176 |
37,998
(C3) |
Revenue
from other sources11 |
5,930 |
6,825 |
Total
Price of Departmental Outputs |
41,106 |
44,823
(E3) |
TOTAL
ESTIMATED RESOURCING FOR OUTCOME 3 FOR OUTCOME 3
(Total Price of Outputs and Admin
Expenses)
|
511,733 |
514,271 |
| |
1999-2000 |
2000-01 |
| AVERAGE STAFFING LEVELS
(NUMBER) |
280 |
283 |
Notes: 1. This includes credits in the Budget Estimate to
the Australian International Education Fund Account.
Return
to the Top of the Page
CONTRIBUTION
OF OUTPUTS TO OUTCOME 3
The Departments third Outcome reflects
the research training, research activities and international activities of the Department.
There are three Output Groups:
a) Block funding for higher education research and
research training;
b) Higher education competitive research
programmes; and
c) Internationalisation of Australian education and
training.
The first two Output Groups reflects the variety
of research and research training programmes administered by the Portfolio on
behalf of the Government. As part of the implementation of the new higher education
research and research training framework, Knowledge and Innovation, announced by
the Government in December 1999, interim programme arrangements will apply for calendar
year 2000. The higher education research and research training programmes will be
administered by the Department and are included under Output Group 3.1, while those which
are to be administered by the Australian Research Council are included under Output Group
3.2.
Block funding for higher education research and
research training (Output Group 3.1) includes funds for Australian Postgraduate Awards,
International Postgraduate Research Scholarships, and for the Research Infrastructure
Block Grant (RIBG) and Small Grants schemes. These programmes will be subsumed in new
programme arrangements to be put in place over the course of 2000 and 2001. In addition,
block funding for higher education research and research training activities is provided
as part of the university operating grants reported under Output Group 2.1.
Higher education competitive research programmes
(Output Group 3.2) includes a wide range of programmes administered by the Australian
Research Council that are available on a competitive basis to individuals or research
teams. These include the Large Grants, Strategic Partnerships with Industry
Research and Training, Research Fellowships, Research Infrastructure Equipment and
Facilities, International Researcher Exchange Schemes, funds for Special Research Centres,
Key Centres of Teaching and Research, project grants for the Learned Academies and funding
for the Australian and New Zealand Council for the Care of Animals in Research and
Teaching.
The third Output Group focuses on the
Departments international activities including Australian Education
International, regulation of overseas student providers, the recognition of overseas
qualifications and a range of small initiatives aimed at increasing our international
participation.
In undertaking these activities, the Department is
developing and implementing streamlined policies and administrative arrangements to
improve financial accountability. Some of the outputs contributing to this Outcome are
highlighted below.
In December 1999 the Government released its
policy statement, Knowledge and Innovation, which outlines a new policy and funding
framework for higher education research and research training. The new framework will
assist Australia to be a competitive global knowledge economy by providing stronger
incentives for collaboration between universities and industry, establishing the
Australian Research Council as an independent body with management responsibility for
competitive research programmes, encouraging better quality training for postgraduate
research students, establishing a new quality assurance system for research and research
training, and ensuring that the research and research training needs and interests of
regional communities are addressed.
In 2000-01 new administrative arrangements will
also enable greater emphasis to be placed on the research of overseas education systems,
improving international arrangements for the recognition of qualifications and enhancing
the portability of Australian qualifications. In addition to continuing to provide a range
of services to individuals with overseas qualifications, NOOSR will develop a more
effective framework for the monitoring of assessments of overseas qualifications
undertaken by external agencies.
Participation in the international education
sector is expected to continue to grow. Expenditure by overseas students contributed an
estimated $3.1 billion to Australias economy in 1999, up from $2.9 billion in 1998.
Approximately $1.6 billion was paid directly in fees to institutions and $1.5 billion
indirectly in the purchase of goods and services, such as accommodation. The growth
reflects the significant growth in higher education enrolments (which generate the highest
levels of fees and other expenditure by students of all sectors) and return to growth in
ELICOS compared to 1998, offset by the fall in enrolments in the other two sectors
schools and vocational education and training. Earnings from the export of Australian
education and training services in 1999 constituted 2.7 per cent of Australian exports of
goods and services or 11.3 per cent of total service exports.
Return
to the Top of the Page
PERFORMANCE
INFORMATION FOR OUTCOME 3
Performance information for Outcome 3 relates
to the strategic priorities for the Department and sets out the expected performance
levels during 2000-01. This encompasses:
a) the overall effectiveness in achieving the
Outcome;
b) the performance of third parties in delivering
outputs on behalf of the Government, funded from administered items; and
c) Departmental Outputs to support the Outcome,
and categorised in terms of Administration, Policy Advising, Ministerial and Parliamentary
Services, Research, Analysis and Evaluation, and Service Delivery.
Effectiveness in Achieving the Outcome
Extent of collaborative university-industry links
The Strategic Partnerships with Industry -
Research and Training (SPIRT) Scheme is the major programme aimed at encouraging the
development of university research-industry links. In 2000, 667 industry partners have
undertaken to provide $30.6 million for collaborative research activities through
cash and in-kind contributions in 441 new projects.
(Source: Higher Education Report for the 2000 to 2002 triennium)
Incidence of international research
collaboration
In 2000, 285 commencing Large Grants Scheme
projects (46 per cent) will involve international collaboration with researchers in 58
countries. 18 Fellowships and 89 Awards will be provided under the International
Researcher Exchange Scheme in 2000. International co-operation in the co-authorship of
research articles will be assessed against the 1996 benchmark for OECD countries. (latest
available data).
(Source: Higher Education Report for the 2000
to 2002 triennium and unpublished data)
Unemployment experience by level of educational
attainment
Performance in regard to persons with higher
degrees will be assessed against the 1998 benchmark (most recently available data). See
performance indicator for Outcome 2 for details.
Australias share of world research papers
and citations
Performance of Australia's share of the
World's output of research papers and citations will be assessed against the 1997
benchmark (most recently available data). For the five years to 1997:
Australias performance in research by
discipline
| |
Share (%) |
|
Share (%) |
| Geosciences |
5.09 |
Molecular biology/genetics |
2.62 |
| Plant and animal sciences |
4.79 |
Biology and biochemistry |
2.50 |
| Education |
4.79 |
Arts and humanities |
2.46 |
| Ecology/environment |
4.33 |
Neurosciences |
2.31 |
| Agricultural Sciences |
4.31 |
Pharmacology |
2.27 |
| Social sciences, general |
4.05 |
Computer Sciences |
2.27 |
| Astrophysics |
3.62 |
Multidisciplinary |
2.15 |
| Psychology/psychiatry |
3.60 |
Engineering |
2.14 |
| Immunology |
3.38 |
Materials sciences |
1.80 |
| Microbiology |
3.22 |
Physics |
1.72 |
| Economics and business |
3.07 |
Chemistry |
1.69 |
| Mathematics |
2.76 |
Law |
0.65 |
| Clinical medicine |
2.70 |
|
|
(Source: Department of Industry, Science and
Resources)
The impact (measured by citations) of Australias research
relative to the world average by discipline
| |
Deviation % |
|
Deviation% |
| Arts and humanities |
41 |
Clinical medicine |
-5 |
| Mathematics |
17 |
Microbiology |
-9 |
| Astrophysics |
13 |
Immunology |
-14 |
| Agricultural Sciences |
9 |
Education |
-16 |
| Plant and animal sciences |
9 |
Psychology/psychiatry |
-17 |
| Ecology/environment |
7 |
Biology and biochemistry |
-17 |
| Geosciences |
6 |
Social sciences, general |
-19 |
| Multidisciplinary |
6 |
Neurosciences |
-19 |
| Engineering |
5 |
Molecular biology/genetics |
-19 |
| Materials sciences |
3 |
Computer Sciences |
-29 |
| Physics |
0 |
Economics and business |
-43 |
| Chemistry |
-1 |
Law |
-59 |
| Pharmacology |
-2 |
|
|
(Source: Department of Industry, Science and
Resources)
Patents and the links between Australian research and
technology
The number of Australian patents and the links
between Australian research publications and US patent applications will be benchmarked in
2000 through a methodology developed by US based CHI Research.
Level of trade in education and training and
professional services
The Department expects an increasing level of
international trade in education, training and professional services during 2000-01.
Performance will be assessed against 1999 performance of 157,834 overseas students
studying in Australia and their estimated contribution to the Australian economy of $3.1
billion.
Performance in regard to strengthening
international education, research and research training will also be informed by progress
made against the following strategic priorities:
- Implementation of key aspects of the Governments White Paper
on research and research training
In December 1999, the Government released its
White Paper Knowledge and Innovation. During 2000 the new National Competitive
Grants Programme will be developed by the ARC for implementation in 2001. It will subsume
a number of existing ARC referred programmes under two elements, Discovery and Linkage.
For example the Large Grants scheme will come under Discovery and the SPIRT scheme will
come under Linkage.
The ARCs new organisational structure will
also be implemented progressively during 2000, with full implementation proposed from the
commencement of 2001. This involves the development and passage through Parliament of the
ARC Bill as well as the appointment of a part time Chair, a full time CEO and up to 6 full
time programme managers, who will oversight the peer review process for the allocation of
research funding for the competitive research programmes. A new accountability framework
for the ARC will also be implemented from 2000 onwards. During 2000 this involves the
development of the ARCs first three-year Strategic Plan which will be complemented
by the tabling in Parliament of an ARC Annual Report for 2000-01.
- Reforming regulation of the overseas student industry
A major review of the ESOS Act, undertaken in
consultation with State education authorities and providers of services for overseas
students, made recommendations aimed at tightening regulation of the market as a quality
assurance measure. Implementation in consultation with key stakeholders will occur during
2000-01 and will include the introduction of a code of practice and a range of new
financial assurance, monitoring and investigation measures.
Table 2.2.3: Performance Information and Planned
Level of Achievement, 2000-01
Performance Information for Administered Items
Output Group 3.1: Funding higher education research training
| |
Performance Indicator |
2000-01 Performance |
Quantity |
Number of higher
degree research students |
Performance will be
assessed against the 1999 benchmark (most recently available data). In 1999 37,240
students were undertaking a higher degree by research |
| |
Number of new
International Postgraduate Research Scholarships |
In 2000, 300
International Postgraduate Research Scholarships will be awarded, the same number as in
1999. |
| |
Number of
international research students |
Performance will be
assessed against the 1999 benchmark (most recently available data). In 1999 there were
4,335 international research students, 5.2 per cent of all international higher education
students. |
Quality |
Proportion of higher
education institutions meeting research and research training management plan requirements |
All publicly funded
higher education institutions research and research management plans are expected to
be published in 2001. The documents will also inform the deliberations of the Australian
University Quality Agency. |
| |
Proportion of higher
education institutions meeting annual profiles requirements |
All publicly funded
higher education institutions are expected to comply with the requirements set for the
2000 profiles round. |
| |
Higher degree
graduates satisfaction with their course |
A Postgraduate
Research Experience Questionnaire has been successfully piloted and the results of the
first national survey are expected to be available by the end of 2000. Performance will be
assessed against this benchmark. |
Output Group 3.2: ARCs competitive programmes
| |
Performance Indicator |
2000-01 Performance |
Quantity |
Number and average
value of new grants under the Large Grants Scheme |
In 2000, 620 grants
averaging $55,661 will be provided. |
| |
Number and average
value of new awards, including APA(I)s and APD(I)s under the Strategic Partnerships with
Industry-Research and Training Scheme |
In 2000, 441 new
SPIRT grants averaging around $44,500 will be provided. This includes 334 Australian
Postgraduate (Industry) Awards and 18 Australian Postdoctoral (Industry) Awards. |
| |
Number of Special
Research Centres and Key Centres of Teaching and Research |
In 2000, 19 Special
Research Centres and 17 Key Centres of Teaching and Learning will be funded. |
| |
Number of
collaborative infrastructure grants under the Research Infrastructure Equipment and
Facilities scheme |
In 2000, 70 grants
will be awarded under the RIEF scheme. Commonwealth funding of $21.7m will lead to the
acquisition of equipment and facilities to the value of approximately $44m |
| |
Number of grants
awarded which involve international collaboration |
In 2000, 285
commencing grants will be provided under the Large Grants scheme, which involve
international collaboration with researchers in 58 countries. In 2000 18 fellowships and
89 awards under the International Researcher Exchange Scheme involve collaboration with
researchers in 23 countries. |
| |
Number of research fellowships |
In 2000, 55
Australian Postdoctoral Fellowships, 15 Australian Research Fellowships, 15 Queen
Elizabeth II Fellowships and 15 Senior Research Fellowships will be provided. |
Quality |
Number of higher
degree research completions under the Australian Postgraduate Awards (Industry) of the
SPIRT programme. |
Performance will be
assessed against the benchmark for the 1998 cohort of students.(most recently available
data). |
Output Group 3.2: ARCs competitive programmes
| |
Performance Indicator |
2000-01 Performance |
Quality (cont) |
Satisfaction of
APA(I) higher degree graduates with their course |
Performance will be
assessed against benchmark data from the Postgraduate Research Experience Questionnaire. |
| |
Employers'
satisfaction with graduates from the Australian Postgraduate Awards (Industry) programme. |
Performance will be
assessed against the benchmark data arising from a survey of employers views of the
skills and attributes of higher degree graduates, which is currently being developed. |
| |
Satisfaction and
performance of ARC postdoctoral and fellowship holders. |
Performance will be
assessed against benchmark data drawn from progress and final reports for postdoctoral and
fellowship holders. |
| |
Capacity of research
funding schemes to leverage funding from partner organisations such as universities
or industry. |
Performance will be
assessed against 1999 benchmark. In 1999, partner organisations contributed $158.5 million
compared with $112.3 million of Commonwealth funding for those schemes, which involve a
partner contribution. |
| |
Success rates for the
Discovery element under the National Competitive Grants Programme. |
Performance will be
benchmarked against the 1999 performance of the Large Grants (22 per cent) and Fellowships
(15 per cent) schemes. |
| |
Number of journal
articles published by Australian researchers per year
Number of citations (as a measure of
impact) of published articles by Australian researchers per year compared with that of the
worlds. |
Performance will be
assessed against the 1997 benchmark (most recently available data). Australia published
967 papers/million population/year for the five years to 1997, and had an international
ranking of tenth place. For citations Australia scored above the worlds average in
10 disciplines out of 25. |
Output Group 3.3: Internationalisation of Australian education
and training
| |
Performance Indicator |
2000-01 Performance |
Quantity |
Completion rate of
NOOSR bridging courses. |
Bridging courses achieve at least an 80%
successful completion rate.
|
| |
Number of major NOOSR
projects and international agreements completed
|
APEC Engineer
Register framework in place by first quarter 2000-01
Signing and ratification of Lisbon
Recognition Convention by end first quarter 2000-01 and promotion of Convention. |
Quality |
Improved flexibility
in delivery of Bridging courses for the overseas trained. |
Bridging courses
available in a range of occupations with streamlined administration and greater
flexibility of delivery |
| |
Enhanced
international recognition of Australian educational awards |
Existing MOUs on
mutual recognition of qualifications are reviewed and promoted |
| |
Extent to which DETYA
contributes to achieving Australias trade facilitation objectives via participation
in key global education and training cooperation activities |
Continue
Australias leadership role in the APEC alliance via provision of strategic papers,
facilitation and preparation of meetings.
Continue to manage and monitor
Australias position on trade and investment in Education services in the context of
the World Trade Organisation (WTO), including through the completion of a project in the
APEC Group on Services
Continued representation of Australia in bilateral
and multilateral fora (SEAMEO, UNESCO, OECD) by preparation of major papers, consultation
within Australia and overseas. |
Output Group 3.3: Internationalisation of Australian education
and training (cont)
| |
Performance Indicator |
2000-01 Performance |
Quality (cont) |
Extent to which
International Education and Training Grants and International Awards and Exchanges
continue to provide opportunities for Australians to participate in and benefit from the
international education and training community |
Continued
participation in international bilateral and multilateral collaborative projects,
particularly with countries in the Asia Pacific region
Continuation of exchange programmes through
provision of scholarships and fellowships. (Based on 1999-2000 figures, it is anticipated
that over 400 scholarships, fellowships and exchange opportunities will be offered to
Australians during 2000-01. Funding will also be provided to assist other award programmes
in which Australians participate) |
Performance Information for Departmental Outputs
The following performance indicators are common to all
Departmental Outputs:
| |
Performance Indicator |
2000-01 Performance |
Administration |
Accurate and timely
approval, payment and acquittal of grants in accordance with legislation and guidelines |
Satisfactory
performance in 2000 and 2001 Quality Assurance exercises, with at least 90 per cent
compliance (an ANAO benchmark)* |
Policy Advising |
The Department will
provide high quality and timely policy advice to meet the requirements of the Minister |
The Minister will be
satisfied with the timeliness and quality of advice provided by the Department |
Ministerial and
Parliamentary Services |
The Department will
provide high quality and timely services to the Minister and the Parliament in order to
meet accountability requirements for the Parliament and the Australian public. |
The 2000-01 Annual
Report will be produced in accordance with Guidelines issued by the Department of Prime
Minister and Cabinet and will be tabled in Parliament by 31 October 2001.
The 1999-2000 Annual Report will be produced in
accordance with the Guidelines and will be tabled in Parliament by 31 October 2000.
Responses to Questions on Notice and Parliamentary
Reports will be provided within timelines set by the Parliament and its Committees and,
where this is not possible or where resources do not permit, interim responses will be
supplied within the set timelines.
The Minister will be satisfied with the timeliness
and quality of Ministerials provided by the Department |
Output Group 3.1: Funding higher education research training
The following performance indicators are specific to Output
Group 3.1:
| |
Performance Indicator |
2000-01 Performance |
Administration |
Maintenance of
effective funding arrangements for the higher education sector |
Publication of the
Higher Education Report for the 2001-2003 Triennium |
| |
Timely production,
publication and dissemination of information about government higher education programmes
and services |
Publication/distribution
of the following according to agreed timetables:
Higher education institutions strategic,
Research and Research Training Management, Quality, Indigenous and Equity Plans.
Selected Higher Education Students, Staff
and Finance Statistics
Postgraduate Research Experience Questionnaire
and Postgraduate Destination Survey
The Characteristics and Performance of Higher
Education Institutions.
|
Research, Analysis and
Evaluation |
The Department will
undertake high quality research, analysis and evaluation studies to address policy and
programme requirements of the output group, ensuring that such studies are completed on
time |
The following studies
will be completed during 2000-01 and in accordance with their objectives:
|
Output Group 3.2: ARCs competitive programmes
The following performance indicators are specific to Output
Group 3.2:
| |
Performance Indicator |
2000-01 Performance |
Administration |
Administer specified
research and research training schemes in a timely, efficient and accountable manner, in
accordance with legislative and other requirements |
The number of
internal appeals and complaints to external bodies as well as the number of upheld appeals
and upheld complaints to external bodies.
|
| |
Continue to improve
the administrative efficiency of the Competitive Research Programmes |
Build an enhanced
electronic platform during 2000-01 for processing grant applications. |
Research, Analysis and
Evaluation |
The ARC will
undertake high quality research, analysis and evaluation studies to address policy and
programme requirements of the output group, ensuring that such studies are completed on
time |
The following studies
will be completed on time during 2000-01 and in accordance with their objectives:
Australian Science and Technology Linkages
Long term impact of ARC supported research
ARC Information and Data Requirements
Establishing benchmarks for technology transfer
and the commercialisation of Australian university research.
|
Output Group 3.3: Internationalisation of
Australian education and training
The following performance indicators are specific to Output
Group 3.3:
| |
Performance Indicator |
2000-01 Performance |
Administration |
Effective management
of financial arrangements for Australian Education International (AEI) |
Industry payment for
subscriptions and contracted services: $1.4 million
AEI subscriptions: 95 per cent of universities and
State/Territory education and training systems and 100 ELICOS and Private providers |
| |
Effective and timely
management of DETYA International Services (DIS) |
Respond to
opportunities to market DETYA expertise overseas and recover costs over 3 years
|
| |
Provide quality
support to the Australian international education industry |
Sectoral marketing
strategies for 2000-01 developed in consultation with the industry by July 2000.
Continue the Study in Australia
generic marketing campaign.
Preliminary work undertaken on major upgrade of AE
Student Website. |
| |
Support
Australias objectives to promote education exports and internationalise education
onshore by facilitating access to other markets |
Ongoing review of
current MOUs to ensure consistency with Australias international agenda.
New MOUs developed to unlock opportunities for
Australian education and training as circumstances dictate |
Output Group 3.3: Internationalisation of
Australian education and training
| |
Performance Indicator |
2000-01 Performance |
Administration (cont) |
Provide high quality
administrative support and advice on international education and training issues |
Continued
responsiveness to Ministers, Executive and other stakeholders in:
provision of strategic papers and briefs on
bilateral and multilateral issues;
facilitation and preparation for bilateral and
multilateral discussions;
development of a range of activities to
contribute to the redevelopment of the East Timorese education system;
advice on trends in overseas student numbers.
|
| |
Developing and
monitoring industry compliance with regulatory requirements in light of the outcomes of
the ESOS Review |
An electronic
Confirmation of Enrolment system for overseas students will be introduced in July 2000
(Phase 1) and an updated version available by January 2001
A Code for overseas student providers will be
prepared in consultation with States by end-2000 with a view to implementation in 2001
Investigation processes will be developed for
implementation as soon as legislation is passed
Revised CRICOS charges will be introduced by
February 2001
Fidelity Fund and associated processes will be
established by 30 June 2001 |
| |
Provision of
assessments of overseas qualifications to a high standard and in an effective and
efficient manner. |
Average completion
time of 8 weeks maintained for in-house assessments; arrangements for the devolution of
assessments by examination finalised. |
Output Group 3.3: Internationalisation of
Australian education and training (cont)
| |
Performance Indicator |
2000-01 Performance |
Research, Analysis and
Evaluation |
The Department will
undertake high quality research, analysis and evaluation studies to address policy and
programme requirements of the output group, ensuring that such studies are completed on
time |
The following
research studies are planned for completion during 2000-01:
|
Return
to the Top of the Page
EVALUATIONS
Information on planned evaluation activity
that relates to this outcome is included in Table 2.2.3 above and the results will be
shown in the Annual Report.
The Department will undertake research, analysis
and evaluation studies to address policy and programme requirements of the output group,
ensuring that such studies are completed on time. For the coming year these will include:
Return
to the Top of the Page
COMPETITIVE
TENDERING AND CONTRACTING
The following Departmental Outputs will continue to be subject
to contracting out of all or part of service delivery to external providers during
2000-01:
- administration of some overseas awards and scholarships will be
contracted out
In 2000-01, devolution of responsibility for the
assessment of overseas qualifications to the professions themselves in a number of
occupations will be finalised as follows: veterinary science, occupational therapy - by
July 2000; chiropractors, osteopaths, valuers and nuclear medicine technologists - by
December 2000.
Return
to the Top of the Page
Other Outcomes
Back to Portfolio Budget Statements
Homepage
Return to the DETYA 2000 - 2001
Budget Homepage
|