About Us
Archive Commonwealth Department of Education, Science and Training
Home EducationScienceTraining  Search

About DETYA

 

Agency Budget Statements - DETYA - Section 2 - Outcome 3


OUTCOME 3 AND CONTRIBUTING OUTPUTS

An organisation chart PDF document showing Outcome 2 and Contributing Outputs is available.

You need Acrobat Reader to read the PDF file.
Free Acrobat PDF reader software is available for downloading from
the DETYA ftp site

OUTCOME 3

Australian institutions advance the knowledge base, contribute to the national innovation system and participate effectively in the global development of knowledge and skills.

Return to the Top of the Page

DESCRIPTION

Commonwealth investment in higher education research and research training supports the development of the new knowledge and innovation necessary to stimulate the new business development and jobs growth on which Australia’s prosperity and living standards depend. It encourages universities to be active partners with enterprises and other research organisations, facilitating the flow of knowledge, people and expertise both locally and internationally. Specific investment in research training, one of the vital functions of the higher education system, ensures the growth of the trained researcher workforce and the ongoing transfer of knowledge and technique.

The Government remains committed to fostering opportunities for Australians in the international community through its support of international education and training initiatives. Its leadership in the global development of skills and knowledge contributes to the recognition of Australia as a culturally, scientifically, technologically and intellectually sophisticated country.

Return to the Top of the Page

MEASURES DISCLOSED IN THE 2000-01 BUDGET AFFECTING OUTCOME 3

Increased funding for the Research Infrastructure Equipment and Facilities Scheme

The Government will provide additional ongoing funding for the Research Infrastructure Equipment and Facilities (RIEF) Scheme to boost base funding to $24.6 million per annum from 2001. The RIEF Scheme funds large items of research infrastructure for collaborative use by universities, research organisations and industry and supports access by Australian researchers to major national and international research facilities.

These additional funds will further promote private investment in Australia’s research infrastructure, while universities, research organisations and industry partners contribute at least 25 per cent of the cost of equipment and facilities acquired under the Scheme.

Strategic Partnerships with Industry – Research and Training Scheme

The Government will maintain current funding levels for the Strategic Partnerships with Industry Research Training (SPIRT) Scheme on an ongoing basis, providing $13.0 million in 2001-02, $24.7 million in 2002-03 and $25.1 million in 2003-04. Provision for this funding has already been included in the Forward Estimates. This measure extends the Government’s 1998 election commitment to provide additional funding for SPIRT for a three-year period, and provides ongoing base funding of $56.8 million per calendar year.

The Scheme aims to improve links between universities and industry by supporting collaborative research projects undertaken to acquire new knowledge and by providing awards and fellowships for training in industrial settings. The Scheme leverages substantial financial contributions from industry partners that, at a minimum, match Commonwealth funding.

Grant to the Australian-American Education (Fulbright) Foundation

The Government will provide a one-off grant of $0.2 million in 2000-01 to the Australian-American Education (Fulbright) Foundation for the purchase of office space for its headquarters. This grant is additional to the Commonwealth’s annual contribution of $0.5 million to assist with the Foundation’s education and scholarship programmes, and complements a one-off contribution of $0.4 million from the government of the United States of America for the Foundation’s accommodation.

This measure is being fully absorbed within existing resourcing of the Department.

Education Services for Overseas Students – increased registration fees for education providers - Revenue

The Department maintains the Commonwealth Register of Institutions and Courses for Overseas Students (CRICOS), which is a register of providers of education and training services for overseas students. All such providers are required to be registered on CRICOS, and pay annual registration fees. The Government and decided to increase these annual fees in the context of its decision to take a more active role in the regulation and registration of the education export industry. The amount of the increase to an individual provider will be dependent upon the number of overseas students enrolled.

Education Services for Overseas Students – strengthening the regulatory framework – Expense

The Education Services Overseas Students (Registration of Providers and Financial Regulation) (ESOS) Act 1991 will be amended to strengthen the regulatory framework for the provision of education services for overseas students, including the establishment of a fidelity fund for overseas student providers. This will enable the Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs to take a much more active role in the investigation, monitoring and pursuit of non-compliance by providers of education services.

Return to the Top of the Page

RESOURCES FOR OUTCOME 3

Table 2.1.3 shows total resourcing for Outcome 3, including Total Administered Expenses, Revenue from Government (Appropriation) for Outputs, Revenue from other sources and the Total Price of Outputs. Cell references C3, E3 and J3 show the links back to Table 1.1 PDF document, the Appropriations Table.

You need Acrobat Reader 3.0pdficonsmall.gif (494 bytes) to read the PDF file.
Free Acrobat PDF reader software is available for downloading from
the DETYA ftp site

Table 2.1.3 – Total Resources for Outcome 3 ($’000)

Outcome 3 - Australian institutions advance the knowledge base, contribute to the national innovation system and participate effectively in the global development of knowledge and skills - Australian institutions advance the knowledge base, contribute to the national innovation system and participate effectively in the global development of knowledge and skills

Administered Appropriations

(Further detail at Appendix 4)

Estimated Actual

1999-2000

$’000

Budget

Estimate

2000-01

$’000

Block Funding higher education research and research training

242,355

222,114

Competitive Research Schemes

210,072

239,295

Internationalisation of Australian education and training

18,200

8,039

Total Administered Expenses

470,627

469,448

(J3)

Departmental Appropriations
Output Group 3.1 - Block Funding higher education research and research training

2,373

3,224

Output Group 3.2 - Competitive Research Schemes

7,958

9,216

Output Group 3.3 - Internationalisation of Australian education and training

24,845

25,558

Total Revenue from Government (Appropriation) Contributing to Price of Departmental Output

35,176

37,998

(C3)

Revenue from other sources11

5,930

6,825

Total Price of Departmental Outputs

41,106

44,823

(E3)

TOTAL ESTIMATED RESOURCING FOR OUTCOME 3 FOR OUTCOME 3

(Total Price of Outputs and Admin Expenses)

 

511,733

514,271

 

1999-2000

2000-01

AVERAGE STAFFING LEVELS (NUMBER)

280

283

Notes: 1. This includes credits in the Budget Estimate to the Australian International Education Fund Account.

Return to the Top of the Page

CONTRIBUTION OF OUTPUTS TO OUTCOME 3

The Department’s third Outcome reflects the research training, research activities and international activities of the Department. There are three Output Groups:

a) Block funding for higher education research and research training;

b) Higher education competitive research programmes; and

c) Internationalisation of Australian education and training.

The first two Output Groups reflects the variety of research and research training programmes administered by the Portfolio on behalf of the Government. As part of the implementation of the new higher education research and research training framework, Knowledge and Innovation, announced by the Government in December 1999, interim programme arrangements will apply for calendar year 2000. The higher education research and research training programmes will be administered by the Department and are included under Output Group 3.1, while those which are to be administered by the Australian Research Council are included under Output Group 3.2.

Block funding for higher education research and research training (Output Group 3.1) includes funds for Australian Postgraduate Awards, International Postgraduate Research Scholarships, and for the Research Infrastructure Block Grant (RIBG) and Small Grants schemes. These programmes will be subsumed in new programme arrangements to be put in place over the course of 2000 and 2001. In addition, block funding for higher education research and research training activities is provided as part of the university operating grants reported under Output Group 2.1.

Higher education competitive research programmes (Output Group 3.2) includes a wide range of programmes administered by the Australian Research Council that are available on a competitive basis to individuals or research teams. These include the Large Grants, Strategic Partnerships with Industry – Research and Training, Research Fellowships, Research Infrastructure Equipment and Facilities, International Researcher Exchange Schemes, funds for Special Research Centres, Key Centres of Teaching and Research, project grants for the Learned Academies and funding for the Australian and New Zealand Council for the Care of Animals in Research and Teaching.

The third Output Group focuses on the Department’s international activities including Australian Education International, regulation of overseas student providers, the recognition of overseas qualifications and a range of small initiatives aimed at increasing our international participation.

In undertaking these activities, the Department is developing and implementing streamlined policies and administrative arrangements to improve financial accountability. Some of the outputs contributing to this Outcome are highlighted below.

In December 1999 the Government released its policy statement, Knowledge and Innovation, which outlines a new policy and funding framework for higher education research and research training. The new framework will assist Australia to be a competitive global knowledge economy by providing stronger incentives for collaboration between universities and industry, establishing the Australian Research Council as an independent body with management responsibility for competitive research programmes, encouraging better quality training for postgraduate research students, establishing a new quality assurance system for research and research training, and ensuring that the research and research training needs and interests of regional communities are addressed.

In 2000-01 new administrative arrangements will also enable greater emphasis to be placed on the research of overseas education systems, improving international arrangements for the recognition of qualifications and enhancing the portability of Australian qualifications. In addition to continuing to provide a range of services to individuals with overseas qualifications, NOOSR will develop a more effective framework for the monitoring of assessments of overseas qualifications undertaken by external agencies.

Participation in the international education sector is expected to continue to grow. Expenditure by overseas students contributed an estimated $3.1 billion to Australia’s economy in 1999, up from $2.9 billion in 1998. Approximately $1.6 billion was paid directly in fees to institutions and $1.5 billion indirectly in the purchase of goods and services, such as accommodation. The growth reflects the significant growth in higher education enrolments (which generate the highest levels of fees and other expenditure by students of all sectors) and return to growth in ELICOS compared to 1998, offset by the fall in enrolments in the other two sectors – schools and vocational education and training. Earnings from the export of Australian education and training services in 1999 constituted 2.7 per cent of Australian exports of goods and services or 11.3 per cent of total service exports.

Return to the Top of the Page

PERFORMANCE INFORMATION FOR OUTCOME 3

Performance information for Outcome 3 relates to the strategic priorities for the Department and sets out the expected performance levels during 2000-01. This encompasses:

a) the overall effectiveness in achieving the Outcome;

b) the performance of third parties in delivering outputs on behalf of the Government, funded from administered items; and

c) Departmental Outputs to support the Outcome, and categorised in terms of Administration, Policy Advising, Ministerial and Parliamentary Services, Research, Analysis and Evaluation, and Service Delivery.

Effectiveness in Achieving the Outcome

Extent of collaborative university-industry links

The Strategic Partnerships with Industry - Research and Training (SPIRT) Scheme is the major programme aimed at encouraging the development of university research-industry links. In 2000, 667 industry partners have undertaken to provide $30.6 million for collaborative research activities through cash and in-kind contributions in 441 new projects.

(Source: Higher Education Report for the 2000 to 2002 triennium)

Incidence of international research collaboration

In 2000, 285 commencing Large Grants Scheme projects (46 per cent) will involve international collaboration with researchers in 58 countries. 18 Fellowships and 89 Awards will be provided under the International Researcher Exchange Scheme in 2000. International co-operation in the co-authorship of research articles will be assessed against the 1996 benchmark for OECD countries. (latest available data).

(Source: Higher Education Report for the 2000 to 2002 triennium and unpublished data)

Unemployment experience by level of educational attainment

Performance in regard to persons with higher degrees will be assessed against the 1998 benchmark (most recently available data). See performance indicator for Outcome 2 for details.

Australia’s share of world research papers and citations

Performance of Australia's share of the World's output of research papers and citations will be assessed against the 1997 benchmark (most recently available data). For the five years to 1997:

Australia’s performance in research by discipline

 

Share (%)

 

Share (%)

Geosciences

5.09

Molecular biology/genetics

2.62

Plant and animal sciences

4.79

Biology and biochemistry

2.50

Education

4.79

Arts and humanities

2.46

Ecology/environment

4.33

Neurosciences

2.31

Agricultural Sciences

4.31

Pharmacology

2.27

Social sciences, general

4.05

Computer Sciences

2.27

Astrophysics

3.62

Multidisciplinary

2.15

Psychology/psychiatry

3.60

Engineering

2.14

Immunology

3.38

Materials sciences

1.80

Microbiology

3.22

Physics

1.72

Economics and business

3.07

Chemistry

1.69

Mathematics

2.76

Law

0.65

Clinical medicine

2.70

   

(Source: Department of Industry, Science and Resources)

The impact (measured by citations) of Australia’s research relative to the world average by discipline

 

Deviation %

 

Deviation%

Arts and humanities

41

Clinical medicine

-5

Mathematics

17

Microbiology

-9

Astrophysics

13

Immunology

-14

Agricultural Sciences

9

Education

-16

Plant and animal sciences

9

Psychology/psychiatry

-17

Ecology/environment

7

Biology and biochemistry

-17

Geosciences

6

Social sciences, general

-19

Multidisciplinary

6

Neurosciences

-19

Engineering

5

Molecular biology/genetics

-19

Materials sciences

3

Computer Sciences

-29

Physics

0

Economics and business

-43

Chemistry

-1

Law

-59

Pharmacology

-2

   

(Source: Department of Industry, Science and Resources)

Patents and the links between Australian research and technology

The number of Australian patents and the links between Australian research publications and US patent applications will be benchmarked in 2000 through a methodology developed by US based CHI Research.

Level of trade in education and training and professional services

The Department expects an increasing level of international trade in education, training and professional services during 2000-01. Performance will be assessed against 1999 performance of 157,834 overseas students studying in Australia and their estimated contribution to the Australian economy of $3.1 billion.

Performance in regard to strengthening international education, research and research training will also be informed by progress made against the following strategic priorities:

  • Implementation of key aspects of the Government’s White Paper on research and research training

In December 1999, the Government released its White Paper Knowledge and Innovation. During 2000 the new National Competitive Grants Programme will be developed by the ARC for implementation in 2001. It will subsume a number of existing ARC referred programmes under two elements, Discovery and Linkage. For example the Large Grants scheme will come under Discovery and the SPIRT scheme will come under Linkage.

The ARC’s new organisational structure will also be implemented progressively during 2000, with full implementation proposed from the commencement of 2001. This involves the development and passage through Parliament of the ARC Bill as well as the appointment of a part time Chair, a full time CEO and up to 6 full time programme managers, who will oversight the peer review process for the allocation of research funding for the competitive research programmes. A new accountability framework for the ARC will also be implemented from 2000 onwards. During 2000 this involves the development of the ARC’s first three-year Strategic Plan which will be complemented by the tabling in Parliament of an ARC Annual Report for 2000-01.

  • Reforming regulation of the overseas student industry

A major review of the ESOS Act, undertaken in consultation with State education authorities and providers of services for overseas students, made recommendations aimed at tightening regulation of the market as a quality assurance measure. Implementation in consultation with key stakeholders will occur during 2000-01 and will include the introduction of a code of practice and a range of new financial assurance, monitoring and investigation measures.

Table 2.2.3: Performance Information and Planned Level of Achievement, 2000-01

Performance Information for Administered Items

Output Group 3.1: Funding higher education research training

  Performance Indicator 2000-01 Performance

Quantity

Number of higher degree research students

Performance will be assessed against the 1999 benchmark (most recently available data). In 1999 37,240 students were undertaking a higher degree by research

 

Number of new International Postgraduate Research Scholarships

In 2000, 300 International Postgraduate Research Scholarships will be awarded, the same number as in 1999.

 

Number of international research students

Performance will be assessed against the 1999 benchmark (most recently available data). In 1999 there were 4,335 international research students, 5.2 per cent of all international higher education students.

Quality

Proportion of higher education institutions meeting research and research training management plan requirements

All publicly funded higher education institutions’ research and research management plans are expected to be published in 2001. The documents will also inform the deliberations of the Australian University Quality Agency.

 

Proportion of higher education institutions meeting annual profiles requirements

All publicly funded higher education institutions are expected to comply with the requirements set for the 2000 profiles round.

 

Higher degree graduates’ satisfaction with their course

A Postgraduate Research Experience Questionnaire has been successfully piloted and the results of the first national survey are expected to be available by the end of 2000. Performance will be assessed against this benchmark.

Output Group 3.2: ARC’s competitive programmes

  Performance Indicator 2000-01 Performance

Quantity

Number and average value of new grants under the Large Grants Scheme

In 2000, 620 grants averaging $55,661 will be provided.

 

Number and average value of new awards, including APA(I)s and APD(I)s under the Strategic Partnerships with Industry-Research and Training Scheme

In 2000, 441 new SPIRT grants averaging around $44,500 will be provided. This includes 334 Australian Postgraduate (Industry) Awards and 18 Australian Postdoctoral (Industry) Awards.

 

Number of Special Research Centres and Key Centres of Teaching and Research

In 2000, 19 Special Research Centres and 17 Key Centres of Teaching and Learning will be funded.

 

Number of collaborative infrastructure grants under the Research Infrastructure Equipment and Facilities scheme

In 2000, 70 grants will be awarded under the RIEF scheme. Commonwealth funding of $21.7m will lead to the acquisition of equipment and facilities to the value of approximately $44m

 

Number of grants awarded which involve international collaboration

In 2000, 285 commencing grants will be provided under the Large Grants scheme, which involve international collaboration with researchers in 58 countries. In 2000 18 fellowships and 89 awards under the International Researcher Exchange Scheme involve collaboration with researchers in 23 countries.

  Number of research fellowships

In 2000, 55 Australian Postdoctoral Fellowships, 15 Australian Research Fellowships, 15 Queen Elizabeth II Fellowships and 15 Senior Research Fellowships will be provided.

Quality

Number of higher degree research completions under the Australian Postgraduate Awards (Industry) of the SPIRT programme.

Performance will be assessed against the benchmark for the 1998 cohort of students.(most recently available data).

Output Group 3.2: ARC’s competitive programmes

  Performance Indicator 2000-01 Performance

Quality (cont)

Satisfaction of APA(I) higher degree graduates with their course

Performance will be assessed against benchmark data from the Postgraduate Research Experience Questionnaire.

 

Employers' satisfaction with graduates from the Australian Postgraduate Awards (Industry) programme.

Performance will be assessed against the benchmark data arising from a survey of employers’ views of the skills and attributes of higher degree graduates, which is currently being developed.

 

Satisfaction and performance of ARC postdoctoral and fellowship holders.

Performance will be assessed against benchmark data drawn from progress and final reports for postdoctoral and fellowship holders.

 

Capacity of research funding schemes to leverage funding from partner organisations – such as universities or industry.

Performance will be assessed against 1999 benchmark. In 1999, partner organisations contributed $158.5 million compared with $112.3 million of Commonwealth funding for those schemes, which involve a partner contribution.

 

Success rates for the Discovery element under the National Competitive Grants Programme.

Performance will be benchmarked against the 1999 performance of the Large Grants (22 per cent) and Fellowships (15 per cent) schemes.

 

Number of journal articles published by Australian researchers per year

 

Number of citations (as a measure of impact) of published articles by Australian researchers per year compared with that of the world’s.

Performance will be assessed against the 1997 benchmark (most recently available data). Australia published 967 papers/million population/year for the five years to 1997, and had an international ranking of tenth place. For citations Australia scored above the world’s average in 10 disciplines out of 25.

Output Group 3.3: Internationalisation of Australian education and training

  Performance Indicator 2000-01 Performance

Quantity

Completion rate of NOOSR bridging courses.

Bridging courses achieve at least an 80% successful completion rate.

 

Number of major NOOSR projects and international agreements completed

 

APEC Engineer Register framework in place by first quarter 2000-01

Signing and ratification of Lisbon Recognition Convention by end first quarter 2000-01 and promotion of Convention.

Quality

Improved flexibility in delivery of Bridging courses for the overseas trained.

Bridging courses available in a range of occupations with streamlined administration and greater flexibility of delivery

 

Enhanced international recognition of Australian educational awards

Existing MOUs on mutual recognition of qualifications are reviewed and promoted

 

Extent to which DETYA contributes to achieving Australia’s trade facilitation objectives via participation in key global education and training cooperation activities

Continue Australia’s leadership role in the APEC alliance via provision of strategic papers, facilitation and preparation of meetings.

 

Continue to manage and monitor Australia’s position on trade and investment in Education services in the context of the World Trade Organisation (WTO), including through the completion of a project in the APEC Group on Services

Continued representation of Australia in bilateral and multilateral fora (SEAMEO, UNESCO, OECD) by preparation of major papers, consultation within Australia and overseas.

Output Group 3.3: Internationalisation of Australian education and training (cont)

  Performance Indicator 2000-01 Performance

Quality (cont)

Extent to which International Education and Training Grants and International Awards and Exchanges continue to provide opportunities for Australians to participate in and benefit from the international education and training community

Continued participation in international bilateral and multilateral collaborative projects, particularly with countries in the Asia Pacific region

 

Continuation of exchange programmes through provision of scholarships and fellowships. (Based on 1999-2000 figures, it is anticipated that over 400 scholarships, fellowships and exchange opportunities will be offered to Australians during 2000-01. Funding will also be provided to assist other award programmes in which Australians participate)

Performance Information for Departmental Outputs

The following performance indicators are common to all Departmental Outputs:

  Performance Indicator 2000-01 Performance

Administration

Accurate and timely approval, payment and acquittal of grants in accordance with legislation and guidelines

Satisfactory performance in 2000 and 2001 Quality Assurance exercises, with at least 90 per cent compliance (an ANAO benchmark)*

Policy Advising

The Department will provide high quality and timely policy advice to meet the requirements of the Minister

The Minister will be satisfied with the timeliness and quality of advice provided by the Department

Ministerial and Parliamentary Services

The Department will provide high quality and timely services to the Minister and the Parliament in order to meet accountability requirements for the Parliament and the Australian public.

The 2000-01 Annual Report will be produced in accordance with Guidelines issued by the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet and will be tabled in Parliament by 31 October 2001.

The 1999-2000 Annual Report will be produced in accordance with the Guidelines and will be tabled in Parliament by 31 October 2000.

Responses to Questions on Notice and Parliamentary Reports will be provided within timelines set by the Parliament and its Committees and, where this is not possible or where resources do not permit, interim responses will be supplied within the set timelines.

The Minister will be satisfied with the timeliness and quality of Ministerials provided by the Department

Output Group 3.1: Funding higher education research training

The following performance indicators are specific to Output Group 3.1:

  Performance Indicator 2000-01 Performance

Administration

Maintenance of effective funding arrangements for the higher education sector

Publication of the Higher Education Report for the 2001-2003 Triennium

 

Timely production, publication and dissemination of information about government higher education programmes and services

Publication/distribution of the following according to agreed timetables:

  • Higher education institutions’ strategic, Research and Research Training Management, Quality, Indigenous and Equity Plans.

  •  Selected Higher Education Students, Staff and Finance Statistics

  • Postgraduate Research Experience Questionnaire and Postgraduate Destination Survey

  • The Characteristics and Performance of Higher Education Institutions.

Research, Analysis and Evaluation

The Department will undertake high quality research, analysis and evaluation studies to address policy and programme requirements of the output group, ensuring that such studies are completed on time

The following studies will be completed during 2000-01 and in accordance with their objectives:

  • Identifying the Changing Needs of Australian Coursework Postgraduate Students in the Late 1990s

  • Postgraduate Research Experience Questionnaire

Output Group 3.2: ARC’s competitive programmes

The following performance indicators are specific to Output Group 3.2:

  Performance Indicator 2000-01 Performance

Administration

Administer specified research and research training schemes in a timely, efficient and accountable manner, in accordance with legislative and other requirements

The number of internal appeals and complaints to external bodies as well as the number of upheld appeals and upheld complaints to external bodies.

 

 

Continue to improve the administrative efficiency of the Competitive Research Programmes

Build an enhanced electronic platform during 2000-01 for processing grant applications.

Research, Analysis and Evaluation

The ARC will undertake high quality research, analysis and evaluation studies to address policy and programme requirements of the output group, ensuring that such studies are completed on time

The following studies will be completed on time during 2000-01 and in accordance with their objectives:

  • Australian Science and Technology Linkages

  • Long term impact of ARC supported research

  • ARC Information and Data Requirements

  • Establishing benchmarks for technology transfer and the commercialisation of Australian university research.

Output Group 3.3: Internationalisation of Australian education and training

The following performance indicators are specific to Output Group 3.3:

  Performance Indicator 2000-01 Performance

Administration

Effective management of financial arrangements for Australian Education International (AEI)

Industry payment for subscriptions and contracted services: $1.4 million

AEI subscriptions: 95 per cent of universities and State/Territory education and training systems and 100 ELICOS and Private providers

 

Effective and timely management of DETYA International Services (DIS)

Respond to opportunities to market DETYA expertise overseas and recover costs over 3 years

  • Continued distribution of United Nations employment opportunities via the Australian International Recruitment Service (community service obligation)

 

Provide quality support to the Australian international education industry

Sectoral marketing strategies for 2000-01 developed in consultation with the industry by July 2000.

Continue the ‘Study in Australia’ generic marketing campaign.

Preliminary work undertaken on major upgrade of AE Student Website.

 

Support Australia’s objectives to promote education exports and internationalise education onshore by facilitating access to other markets

Ongoing review of current MOUs to ensure consistency with Australia’s international agenda.

New MOUs developed to unlock opportunities for Australian education and training as circumstances dictate

Output Group 3.3: Internationalisation of Australian education and training

  Performance Indicator 2000-01 Performance

Administration (cont)

Provide high quality administrative support and advice on international education and training issues

Continued responsiveness to Ministers, Executive and other stakeholders in:

  • provision of strategic papers and briefs on bilateral and multilateral issues;

  • facilitation and preparation for bilateral and multilateral discussions;

  • development of a range of activities to contribute to the redevelopment of the East Timorese education system;

  • advice on trends in overseas student numbers.

 

Developing and monitoring industry compliance with regulatory requirements in light of the outcomes of the ESOS Review

An electronic Confirmation of Enrolment system for overseas students will be introduced in July 2000 (Phase 1) and an updated version available by January 2001

A Code for overseas student providers will be prepared in consultation with States by end-2000 with a view to implementation in 2001

Investigation processes will be developed for implementation as soon as legislation is passed

Revised CRICOS charges will be introduced by February 2001

Fidelity Fund and associated processes will be established by 30 June 2001

 

Provision of assessments of overseas qualifications to a high standard and in an effective and efficient manner.

Average completion time of 8 weeks maintained for in-house assessments; arrangements for the devolution of assessments by examination finalised.

Output Group 3.3: Internationalisation of Australian education and training (cont)

  Performance Indicator 2000-01 Performance

Research, Analysis and Evaluation

The Department will undertake high quality research, analysis and evaluation studies to address policy and programme requirements of the output group, ensuring that such studies are completed on time

The following research studies are planned for completion during 2000-01:

  • Effective marketing of Australian education

  • Competitor activities

  • Offshore course delivery

Return to the Top of the Page

EVALUATIONS

Information on planned evaluation activity that relates to this outcome is included in Table 2.2.3 above and the results will be shown in the Annual Report.

The Department will undertake research, analysis and evaluation studies to address policy and programme requirements of the output group, ensuring that such studies are completed on time. For the coming year these will include:

  • 2000 Review of the Learned Academies; and

  • Strengthening the Knowledge Contribution of the University to the Economic Competitiveness of the Local Region.

Return to the Top of the Page

COMPETITIVE TENDERING AND CONTRACTING

The following Departmental Outputs will continue to be subject to contracting out of all or part of service delivery to external providers during 2000-01:

  • administration of some overseas awards and scholarships will be contracted out
  • In 2000-01, devolution of responsibility for the assessment of overseas qualifications to the professions themselves in a number of occupations will be finalised as follows: veterinary science, occupational therapy - by July 2000; chiropractors, osteopaths, valuers and nuclear medicine technologists - by December 2000.

Return to the Top of the Page

Other Outcomes

Back to Portfolio Budget Statements Homepage

Return to the DETYA 2000 - 2001 Budget Homepage


contact details  |  search  |  archive search  |  publications  |  site map  | subscribe
career information
| education network australia (EdNA)  
australian education international | prime minister's web site 

Any comments or queries should be sent to: wwweditor@dest.gov.au

This page was last updated on Saturday, 23 April 2005
Department of Education, Science and Training
Copyright © Commonwealth of Australia
DETST Web Site Privacy Statement
Disclaimer