Department of Employment, Education, Training and Youth Affairs

Evaluations and Investigations Programme

Student Flows in Australian
Higher Education

Chandra Shah and Gerald Burke
Monash University

Australian Council for Educational Research
Centre for the Economics of Education and Training

July 1996

Evaluations and Investigations Program
Higher Education Division


Contents

[next chapter] [top of document]


Acknowledgements

Executive Summary

1: Background

2: The Structure of the Model

3: Data

4: Analysis

5: Conclusion

Appendix A: Adjustment Process for Negative Dropout Quantities in Input-Output Matrix

Appendix B: Higher Education Enrolments and Completions, 1989 to 1994

Bibliography


Acknowledgments

[next chapter] [contents]


This project was financed by a grant from the Evaluations and Investigations Program of the Higher Education Division of the Department of Employment, Education, Training and Youth Affairs (DEETYA). The early work on this project was undertaken by Andrew Coleman (see Coleman and Burke 1993). Andrew, who is currently at Princeton University in the United States, has done some additional analysis which may be incorporated into later work on this topic. Chris Betts worked on the project in 1994. The work on the project in 1995 benefited from links with the Study of Medium Term Supply and Demand Projections for the Professions which is supported by a large ARC grant.

We are grateful for the discussions and feedback on earlier drafts of this work with officers in the Higher Education Division of DEETYA, Professor Peter Karmel and participants in seminars at Monash University, Lancaster University (United Kingdom), University of Limburg (The Netherlands) and the Catholic University of Louvain (Belgium), where this work was presented.


Executive Summary

[next chapter] [previous chapter] [contents]


The report outlines the development of a model to study the movement of students in, through and out of higher education in Australia. It provides a means for projecting the number of students, graduates and dropouts by age, gender and broad field of study. The model also provides estimates of the probability of a student completing a course, the average time a student takes to complete a course and the average time a student stays in the system. Data from the student course enrolment file and completion file that DEETYA maintains are used to estimate the model.

Some general conclusions that can be drawn from the results for Australian undergraduate students are:

Some of the variation may be related to the student's mode of study, that is, full-time, part-time or external. Another factor which may affect results is credit transfer from prior courses. These issues could be matters for further research.

The conclusions for postgraduate students are:

Part of the variation in the results may be explained by field of study. Student's mode of study is another matter for further research. It must be noted that Research degree includes both doctorates and Master's by research, and the reported averages are likely to be underestimates for doctorates and overestimates for Master's by research.

Projections of student intake, total enrolment, course completions and dropouts for undergraduates by sex and field of study up to the year 2001 are presented in the report. Similar projections are made for postgraduate students by level of course but not by field of study. The undergraduate projections show variation by field of study, and that for postgraduates the variation is by level of course.

The undergraduate projections reflect:

Under this scenario the projections up to the year 2001 can be summarised as follows:

The postgraduate projections reflect:

Under this scenario the projections up to the year 2001 can be summarised as follows:

An evaluation of the model was carried out by comparing the retrospective predictions of total enrolment numbers for 1989 to 1994 and completion numbers for 1989 to 1993 made with it with the actual numbers for these years. This suggests that it provides predictions for aggregate student enrolments with a high degree of accuracy given the annual intake. A less degree of accuracy is attained for course completions for some fields of study. Where considerable change is occurring in the structure of courses the model provides less accurate predictions.

In this report, the model to project student intake is based on projected demographic changes, a constant Year 12 retention rate and a constant participation rate for non-school-leaver intakes. However, it would be relatively easy to obtain projections based on another set of assumptions, or even using a different model of student intakes. A considerable amount of simulation of the system under varying conditions is possible.

With the existing data and the current model further analysis can be performed. For example, analysis can be done for each State, though some field of study estimates for small states may not be reliable. Some analysis by the student's enrolment status, that is, full-time, part-time or external, can also be carried out. However, existing data does not allow the estimation of completions and dropouts by enrolment states because the completions file does not include that variable. The estimates that are reported can be converted to obtain approximate EFTSUs.

A great deal more work can be undertaken if full cohort data were available for at least a pair of years, say 1994 and 1995 and the student enrolment file was linked to the completions file. In particular, it would then be possible to model those students who transfer from one course to another. A much clearer picture would emerge about the pathways of students and the proportion of a generation achieving a university qualification.


[return to top]