Appendix 1

Table 1: Rotated factor matrix: Factors 1, 2 and 3

 

Factor 1

Factor 2

Factor 3

Factor 4

Factor 5

Factor 6

Factor 7

Perceptions of Teaching Quality

             

The staff make real effort to understand difficulties students may be having with their work

.71

           

Teaching staff here usually give helpful feedback on my progress

.68

           

The quality of teaching in my course is generally good

.68

           

Staff are enthusiastic about the subjects they teach

.65

           

The teaching staff are good at explaining things

.65

           

Most academic staff in my subjects take an interest in my progress

.65

           

Staff are usually available to discuss my work

.64

           

Most of the academic staff are approachable

.63

           

Staff try hard to make the subjects interesting

.62

           

Academic Challenge and Stimulation

           

I am finding my course intellectually stimulating

 

.68

         

I enjoy the intellectual challenge of the subjects I am studying

 

.67

         

The lecturers often stimulate my interest in the subject

 

.66

         

I really enjoy the theoretical content of my subjects

 

.63

         

So far I have found most of my subjects really interesting

 

.62

         

I get a lot of satisfaction from studying

 

.54

         

Overall, I am really enjoying my course

 

.49

         

Lecturers are a valuable source of information for me

 

.48

         

Study at university is more fulfilling than school

 

.44

         

Sense of Belonging

             

I really like being a university student

   

.74

       

I think university life really suits me

   

.73

       

I really like the atmosphere at this campus

   

.71

       

University just hasn’t lived up to my expectations

   

- .69

       

Overall, I am very satisfied with my university experience so far

   

.67

       

I have not made close friends at university

   

- .50

       
               

 

Table 2 Rotated factor matrix: Factors 4, 5, 6 and 7

 

Factor 1

Factor 2

Factor 3

Factor 4

Factor 5

Factor 6

Factor 7

Sense of Purpose

             

I know the type of occupation I want

     

.76

     

I was not ready to choose a university course

     

- .64

     

I am clear about the reasons I came to university

     

.62

     

Studying at university is just marking time while I decide my future

     

- .58

     

I have a clear idea where my course is going

     

.55

     

I would have preferred a general first year

     

.52

     

Being at university will really help me get what I want in life

     

.47

     

Workload

             

My course workload is too heavy

       

.78

   

The volume of work means I can’t comprehend it thoroughly

       

.74

   

The number of contact hours make it difficult to complete set tasks

       

.66

   

The syllabus tries to cover too many topics

       

.55

   

University is more demanding than school

       

- .53

   

Find it difficult to comprehend a lot of the material

       

.53

   

Family Support

             

Often discuss my university work with family

         

.76

 

In Year 12, family supportive of study

         

.72

 

Parents have little understanding of what I do at university

         

- .68

 

Family support less important to me now

         

- .54

 

 

 

Commitment and Involvement

             

I worked consistently through first semester

           

.60

Regularly seek advice of teaching staff

           

.56

Find it difficult to get motivated to study

           

- .52

Choose subjects to get top marks

           

.47

Strong desire to do well in all my subjects

           

.40

               

 

Appendix 2. Monash University student profile

 

Monash University has six campuses in Victoria, and ten faculties. Student enrolment numbers, based on March 1996 data, at the different campuses vary considerably: Clayton (20427), Caulfield (8935); Peninsula (3418), Gippsland (7874), Berwick (427), Parkville (462).

Based on March 1996 date, most of the undergraduate student load (84.6%) is government supported (HECS) and competitively allocated according to prior academic performance. Most (67.0%) students in undergraduate degrees enrolments study full-time, particularly at Parkville (84.2%), Peninsula (69%) and Clayton (67%), but slightly over half (54.6%) at Caulfield, but only about one-fifth (21.8%) study full time at Gippsland. The majority of students are female (53.5%), but this varies across faculties and campuses: more in Arts (73.3%) and Pharmacy (58.9%) but fewer in Computing and Information Technology (CIT) (27.1%) and Engineering (16.4%) in single undergraduate programs; more at Berwick (82%) and Peninsula (70%) but fewer at Caulfield (47%). The modal age of Monash students is about 19 years, but there is actually considerable spread. Almost two fifths (39.7%) of enrolments are 25 years or older; more than a quarter (26.1%) are 30 or older. Age profiles vary with campus. The proportions of students 25 years or older range from few at Berwick (4.9%) and Parkville (16.2%), approximately a third at Peninsula (28.4%), Clayton (32.8%) and Caulfield (38.9%), up to two-thirds at Gippsland. Age profiles also vary across faculties. For instance, such mature students constitute the majority in single degree enrolments in Education (71%), under half (43.9%) in each of Arts and Business and Economics, but just over a quarter in both Science (29.2%) and Engineering (27.2%).

Australia is country of permanent residence of 85.2% of Monash students, but many (35.9%) were born outside Australia, with well over half of these (23.1% of total enrolments) being born in southern, southeastern, or northeastern Asia. A language other than English is the main language spoken at home of 30.8% of students, with almost half of these speaking Chinese dialect. Main languages other than English vary across campuses: Parkville (53.2%), Caulfield (41.1%), and less than a quarter of students at Clayton (29.5%), Peninsula 25.2%) and Gippsland (24.7%). There is also variation across faculties: fewer in Arts (16.4%) and Law (17.9%), but more in Business and Economics (38.8%) and in CIT a majority (52.1%). Most (88%) international students are in undergraduate courses. They do not spread consistently across faculties or campuses, most enrolling in Business and Economics (45%) and in CIT (19.5 %), and 25% are external. International enrolments as a proportion of the total are small (5.4%) at Parkville, constitute about one-tenth at Clayton (9.4%) and Peninsula (12.1%), and one-fifth at Caulfield (19.3%) and Gippsland (21.3%). International students represent about a quarter of total single degree enrolments in CIT (26.5%) and Business and Economics (24.7%) and but very few are in Arts (4.7%), Science (3.5%) and Education (2.0%).

Of the students commencing an undergraduate program, just over half (51.6%) do so on the basis of final year secondary school results, and a fifth (20.2%) on the basis of previous higher education. The remainder come in under a range of provisions through TAFE studies (9.7%), mature age or other special entry schemes (5.8%), or employment experience (1.26%) or professional qualifications (2.39%) and a small number through Open Learning studies (0.3%). Campus profiles differ considerably on proportion of intake based on secondary school results: most at Berwick (89.9%), Parkville (82.9%) and Clayton (73.9%), over half (54.2%) at Peninsula and under half (43.2%) Caulfield, but for Gippsland only about one-fifth (21.1%). For students entering an undergraduate program on the basis of previous higher education studies the proportions are fairly low at Peninsula (11.6%), Clayton (12.5%) and Caulfield (15.1%), but are nearly half for Gippsland (44.7%). Across faculties, secondary school results account for most of the admissions to a single degree undergraduate program in Pharmacy (82.9%) and Science (58.2%), but less than half in Business and Economics (39.8%) and Education (34.4%). Previous higher education studies were often the basis for many single degree undergraduate admissions in Law (50.9%) and Education (37.9%), but seldom in Pharmacy (17.1%) and Engineering (14.6%). The prior academic performance of enrolling students also varies considerably. Over half (54%) of commencing undergraduates apply through VTAC and 40% of these are school leavers, for whom the published TER "clearly in" and "fringe" admission ranks provide the benchmarks for entry levels of other student categories. These scores, a percentile ranking of successful VCE students, range from 97 to 45 for Monash courses. They are consistently very high for Medicine, Law and Pharmacy courses but can vary considerably within faculties by course. TER modal values range above 90 for Clayton and Parkville, between 80-90 Caulfield, 60-70 at Peninsula and Berwick and 40-49 at Gippsland.

Appendix 3. Questionnaires and focus group questions

Questionnaires

Questionaire 1 page 1
Questionaire 1 page 2

Questionaire 2 page 1
Questionaire 2 page 2


 

Focus group questions

1. How did you expect tertiary study and teaching to differ from study in secondary school? From whom, or from what experiences, did you develop those expectations?

2. Have your experiences of tertiary study and teaching matched your expectations?

3. How would you define ‘good teaching’ in the university setting?

4. Have your work patterns and study habits changed in your first year?

5. At this stage, what forms of teaching (lectures, tutorials, discussion groups, demonstrations and so on) and what forms of assessment (essays, short exercises, tests) are most rewarding for you? What most helps you learn? What kind of feedback are you receiving, and what do you need?

6. What are the key differences you’ve experienced as a learner in the transition from VCE to first year?

7. What have you enjoyed about campus life and being a student? Is is what you expected it would be?

8. What have you not enjoyed about campus life and being a student? Are there problems or difficulties you did not expect?

9. If you did have problems with study, finances, deadlines and so on, do you know where to go for help?

10. Did you take part in any mentoring schemes, host schemes, orientation week activities, study and support groups, or academic orientation programs? Were they an effective introduction to student life? Are there other programs or forms of support you think you would have found more useful?

In second semester focus groups and videotaped interviews, Questions 1-9 were repeated, though with additional emphasis on possible differences between ‘early in first semester’, ‘in the middle of the year’ and ‘at the end of your first year’. Two additional questions were asked:

1. Have you, or any of your friends, or people you knew at school, experienced what you would call ‘unsuccessful transitions’? How do you explain the problems? What could or should universities do to help students overcome those problems?

2. What kinds of technologies have you experienced in university teaching (from video and Powerpoint to on-line subjects or distance education)? How do they help or not help you learn? How effective are they, and what role should they play in university teaching?

Appendix 4: Results of selected regressions

1997 Survey cohort - Pooled subject results

       

VCE Results

       

Cohort

Constant

Home Language (Eng=1)

Gender (Male=1)

Maths Methods score

Maths Methods (=1)

TER

Lack of Academic/

Social Integration

Career Motivation

Learning = Required Work Only

R-square

adjusted

All Campuses

34.925

4.8246

-1.5267

1.1904

-39.196

0.28237

-1.3833

0.70277

 

0.2032

(n=982)

3.748

5.378

-1.764

9.085

-5.078

3.732

-2.037

1.825

   
                     

Caulfield-Peninsula

5.1284

5.6117

 

0.77267

 

0.41187

-1.4811

 

-1.3926

0.1192

(n=509)

0.5639

3.797

 

3.265

 

3.627

-1.425

 

-2.307

 
                     

Clayton

30.413

3.1698

-2.9666

1.4631

-51.256

0.35794

-1.2166

0.99389

 

0.3566

(n=473)

2.752

3.036

-3.05

10.76

-7.764

3.097

-1.557

2.328

   

The table shows coefficients and t-ratios of explanatory variables for students' first year subject results, based on n pooled observations for various cohorts.

Appendix 5 Relative Teaching Costs Matrix

Cluster

Discipline Weights/Discipline/Level

 

U/G

OPG

HDR

       

1

1.0

1.4

2.0

  Accounting Accounting
  Admin/Eco Admin/Eco Accounting
  Law Law Admin/Eco
  Other Humanities Other Humanities Computing
      Education

2

1.3

1.4

Law
  Behavioural science Education Maths/Stats
  Education Maths/Stats Nursing
  Maths/Stats Other Soc Sci Other Built Env
  Other Soc Sci   Other Health
      Other Humanities

3

1.6

1.8

Other Languages
  Computing Computing Other Soc Sci
  Nursing Nursing Visual/Perf Arts
  Other Built Env Other Built Env  
  Other Health Other Health  
  Other Languages Other Languages  
  Visual/Perf. Arts Visual/Perf. Arts  
       

4

2.2

3.0

4.7

  Engineering    
  Science Behavioural science Behavioural science
  Surveying Agriculture Agriculture
    Dentistry Dentistry

5

2.7

Engineering Engineering
  Agriculture Medicine Medicine
  Dentistry Science Science
  Medicine Surveying Surveying
  Veterinary Science Veterinary Science Veterinary Science
       

Contents.