Victoria University of
Technology
a) EQUITY OBJECTIVES
Victoria University expresses its strong
commitment to equity and social justice in its foundation documents including the Victoria
University of Technology Act (1990) and in key planning documents. The University Council
has incorporated the following term of reference into each of its committees:
"To ensure decisions and
recommendations to Council are in line with University equity and social justice policies
and to seek advice where decisions may impact differentially on staff or students in ways
that relate to characteristics included as grounds in State and Federal
anti-discrimination legislation."
The Planning Committee of Council also includes
the following term of reference:
"To consider the Strategic
Plan, Educational Profiles, including Equity Plan and Aboriginal Education Strategy,
Research Management Plan and EEO Management Plan for the University and recommend changes
to the Plans that are considered desirable."
Academic Board Regulations require it to:
"consider annually the
Universitys staff and student profiles against equity and equal employment
opportunity targets and plans set by the University"(Reg. 2.2A 10.1.b), and:
"set up and maintain processes for the
accreditation and re-accreditation of Higher Education programs to ensure inclusive
curriculum and good teaching practice".(Reg. 2.2A 10.1.c)
The Universitys Social Justice policy
affirms that principles of equity and social justice be integrated into all the University
structures, policies, procedures and plans. The policy on access and equity for students
states:
"Victoria University is
committed to providing tertiary education (TAFE and Higher Education) in an accessible and
equitable way.
The aim is to ensure that the Universitys student population
reflects the composition proportionally of the groups represented in the Universitys
catchment area, including the Western Metropolitan Region of Melbourne."
b) STRATEGIES AND PERFORMANCE
The Universitys equity strategies are
detailed in the current Equity Management Plan. The scope and depth of the plan is
indicated by the outline and consists of broad equity objectives and cross-linked specific
objectives and strategies. The University recognises the richness of our diverse student
population and responds in positive and pro-active ways and through the provision of
academic and personal support services. Key aspects of the Equity Program are the ongoing
development of inclusive curriculum and teaching practice and cultural change to create an
inclusive environment. The University funds the Equity and Social Justice Branch in order
to ensure effort and focus on social justice issues and the implementation of the Equity
Management Plan and other related plans. The Equity Management Plan includes not only
strategies related directly to specific equity groups but also strategies directed at
changing the system and to provide a support structure and resources within which such
work can be done. Specific services continue to be developed to cater for the needs of
particular groups of students; eg Aborigines and Torres Strait Islanders and students with
a disability. Inclusive practice and policy in the provision of generic services are
developed in parallel.
An analysis of the Universitys equity
profile enabled the identification of strengths and weaknesses leading to the formulation
of the following goals. The strategies in this report focus on these goals.
- To increase the success rates of people from Non-English speaking
backgrounds (NESB) and low socio-economic status (SES) backgrounds students to the level
of the whole student body.
- To increase the successful participation of women in post-graduate
study and disciplines where they are under-represented.
- To increase the employment and employability of all students
especially low SES, NESB, students with a disability, Koori students, and women in
non-traditional fields.
- To increase access for students with a disability and maintain
success and retention at comparable levels.
Specific strategies:
PASP (Personalised Access and Study Policy)
The Personalised Access and Study policy is based
on the view that students as individuals can succeed to their potential when teaching,
support and administrative systems are focussed on student expectations and needs which
are at the centre of all the University does. The focus is on assisting students to meet
their educational objectives, and supporting them through that process. The teaching and
learning partnership between the student and the University is documented in a
"compact". Recommendations from equity projects eg inclusive curriculum, have
been incorporated into the PASP Action Plan. Professional development includes briefing on
accommodating the support needs of students with a disability, supports for Koori students
and cross cultural communication skills.
Low SES Project
This project is being developed with the purpose
of identifying characteristics related to low SES in order to more precisely design
strategies and allocate scholarships. Fields will be identified for monitoring. Factors
which impact on mature aged students will be identified.
Cultural Diversity
The purpose of this program is to increase
cultural sensitivity throughout the University particularly in the employment of staff and
in the provision of direct service to students.
Cultural Diversity includes perspectives of the
diverse student body including Kooris and other Aborigines and Torres Strait Islanders;
people from diverse language and cultural backgrounds; persons with a disability; and gay,
lesbian, bisexual and transgender students.
Student Learning Unit
The Unit provides assistance with English
expression, mathematics, discipline-specific terminology, assignment and essay writing.
ESL expertise is available to students directly and also through consultancy to faculties.
The Unit has initiated a postgraduate discussion group which has proven effective in
supporting postgraduate students from non-traditional backgrounds. The Unit has proposals
to develop on-line and traditional format modules which aim to increase access to support
for Koori students and students with a disability.
Inclusive Curriculum
The University has established an inclusive
curriculum program. The program covers gender, culture, language, class, disabilities and
sexualities and includes Koori inclusive curriculum. Key elements are located in the
functions of Academic Board, Planning Committee of Council, Equity and Social Justice
Branch and the Universitys Centre for Professional Development. Recent initiatives
include a project to address the problematic masculine culture in the sport and recreation
discipline through curriculum and professional development and a koori inclusive
curriculum project.
Data Analysis and Performance Indicators
The University will continue to develop and use
effective and appropriate measures for assessing its own equity performance as well as
utilise those required by DETYA. Analysis of the Universitys student profile and
catchment area will continue with particular emphasis on using data to inform teaching and
administrative practice. Development and application of performance indicators over the
next triennium will focus on: Low SES, NESB, employment of graduates and students
with a disability. In particular this project will evaluate the impact of PASP and the
effects on access and participation rates of various types of recruitment and enrolment
procedures, rates of retention and success for designated groups, data analysis support to
the Disability Liaison Unit and the establishment of ongoing capacity within Equity and
Social Justice Branch for managing equity data and reporting internally and externally.
Disability: Generic
Services
Victoria University will continue to implement its
generic model for meeting the needs of students with a disability and to monitor service
provision to ensure that the needs of students with a disability are catered for and
services and processes are inclusive.
Women In
Non-Traditional Fields Of Study
The University has designed a project to bring
together and implement what is known about increasing successful participation of women in
non-traditional fields of study including postgraduate study. Effective strategies include
cultural change and inclusive curriculum. This will be cross-discipline and cross-faculty
and link with the Universitys EEO/Affirmative Action program. This project will
implement recommendations and follow up challenges highlighted in the inclusive curriculum
report. Resources and consultancy will be provided to staff in disciplines where the
participation of women is low in order to enable those departments to address the factors
that create an exclusive environment and curriculum.
Summary Tables by Equity Group
Summary tables for
each equity group in order of priority including historical data, performance indicators
and other benchmarks where applicable.
Low Socio-Economic Status
INDICATOR
(Urban) |
Reference
Value |
1994 |
1995 |
1996 |
1997 |
1998 |
National
average for 1997 |
Access
(17-24 Yrs) |
25 |
33.48 |
36.93 |
39.31 |
33.85% |
37.26 |
15.6 |
Participation
(17-24 Yrs) |
1.0 |
2.02 |
2.27 |
2.38 |
2.19 |
2.34 |
0.39 |
Success
(17-24 Yrs) |
1.0 |
0.97 |
0.96 |
0.94 |
0.95 |
NA |
0.97 |
Retention
(17-24 Yrs) |
1.0 |
1.028 |
1.095 |
1.046 |
0.982 |
1.042 |
0.967 |
Access
(25-64yrs) |
25 |
27.10 |
29.01 |
29.5 |
29.19% |
30.87 |
13.7 |
Participation
(25-64yrs) |
1.0 |
1.98 |
1.69 |
1.77 |
1.75 |
1.78 |
0.36 |
Success
(25-64yrs) |
1.0 |
0.98 |
0.99 |
0.96 |
0.97 |
NA |
0.96 |
Retention
(25-64yrs) |
1.0 |
0.976 |
1.0 |
1.057 |
1.026 |
1.048 |
0.982 |
Context |
Performance
analysis |
Ongoing
monitoring and data analysis |
Equity goal
and performance indicators |
Relevant
strategies |
Region
characterised by lower level of participation in higher education, higher unemployment and
greater educational disadvantage than the metropolitan area as a whole. |
Access
& participation well above sector levels. Retention at or above national performance.
Success for the older group above national
average. Over a third of students are Low SES. |
Detailed
cross group analysis by gender and NESB. Monitoring by fields will be identified in the
Low SES and performance indicators projects. |
To
increase the success rate of low SES students to at least the national average by 2000 as
measured by the Martin indicator for success. |
- PASP including work placements and co-op arrangements
- Student Leadership program
- Student Learning Unit
- Inclusive curriculum
- Non-discriminatory learning environment
- Low SES project
- return to study programs
- access & preparatory programs
recruitment of non-school leavers.
|
Non-English Speaking Background
Indicator |
Reference
Value |
1994 |
1995 |
1996 |
1997 |
1998 |
National
average 1997 |
Access |
8.0% |
15.5% |
14.25% |
13.39% |
9.75% |
10.00% |
5.15% |
Participation |
1.0 |
1.58 |
1.58 |
1.58 |
1.32 |
1.78 |
1.054 |
Success |
1.0 |
0.92 |
0.93 |
0.92 |
0.94 |
N/A |
0.97 |
Retention |
1.0 |
1.009 |
1.062 |
1.067 |
0.959 |
1.052 |
1.054 |
Context |
Performance
analysis |
Ongoing
monitoring and data analysis |
Equity goal
and performance indicators |
Relevant
strategies |
High
proportion of non-English speaking background people in the region. Some groups over &
some under represented at VUT. Well developed relationships with communities eg the
Maltese and Vietnamese communities. |
Access
& participation are well above national average. The drop over time is possibly due to
regional demographics and immigration patterns. Retention relatively stable. Success
increasing. |
Cross
group analysis by gender and SES. Success patterns by Faculty and language group. Student
progress rates. |
To
increase the success rate of NESB students to at least the national average by 2000. |
- PASP
- inclusive curriculum
- Student Learning Unit
- student progress
- recommendations from LOTE project
- cultural diversity program
- relationships with communities
- University language and literacy policy
- inclusive assessment strategies.
|
Students With A Disability
Indicator |
Reference
value |
1996 |
1997 |
1998 |
National
Average for 1997 |
Access |
4.0% |
0.87% |
1.18% |
2.23% |
1.36% |
Participation |
1.0 |
0.24 |
0.31 |
0.61 |
0.32 |
Success |
1.0 |
1.05 |
0.98 |
N/A |
0.93 |
Retention |
1.0 |
N/A |
1.088 |
0.984 |
0.996 |
Context |
Performance
analysis |
Ongoing
monitoring and data analysis |
Equity goal
and performance indicators |
Relevant
strategies |
Regional
demographics provide data from a variety of sources but difficult to be precise. Impact of
regional characteristics on educational opportunities. |
Access
and participation low but are steadily increasing. Indicators for success and retention
have slipped to just below 1.0. |
Data
analysed by campus, age and gender. Numbers of students in Years 11 & 12 in the
region. Monitoring by mode of entry and impact of student progress processes. |
To
increase or maintain performance on all indicators to Martin reference values.
To increase success and retention indicators to
previous levels (ie >1.00). |
- generic services project
- Disability Liaison Officer
- library advisory committees
- individual support provision and analysis of needs
- inclusive curriculum
- revised Action Plan
- Student Learning Unit
- PASP
|
Women
Indicator |
Reference
Value |
1994 |
1995 |
1996 |
1997 |
1998 |
National
Average 1997 |
Access |
50% |
52.9% |
55.78% |
54.7% |
54.45% |
54.04% |
56.63% |
Participation |
50% |
52.3% |
53.7% |
54.01% |
53.47% |
53.21% |
56.49% |
Engineering:
Access
Participation |
|
N/A |
N/A |
9.90%
11.61% |
11.47%
11.1% |
10.18%
10.77% |
14.03%
13.38% |
Business:
Access
Participation |
|
N/A |
N/A |
54.35%
54.07% |
53.58%
53.63% |
51.52%
52.98% |
46.53%
45.35% |
Science:
Access
Participation |
|
N/A |
N/A |
37.26%
42.04% |
36.78%
39.98% |
36.59%
38.27% |
42.23%
42.16% |
Higher
Degree by Research/ Undergraduate |
1.0 |
0.644 |
0.68 |
0.687 |
0.742 |
0.761 |
0.812 |
Higher
Degree by Coursework/
Undergraduate |
1.0 |
0.559 |
0.61 |
0.738 |
0.788 |
0.835 |
0.915 |
Success |
1.0 |
1.12 |
1.11 |
1.11 |
1.11 |
N/A |
|
Retention |
1.0 |
1.014 |
0.988 |
0.985 |
1.001 |
1.015 |
|
Context |
Performance
analysis |
Ongoing
monitoring and data analysis |
Equity
goal and performance indicators |
Relevant
strategies |
In the
region women have less formal qualifications than men. Employment patterns reflect the
pattern overall of women being employed in less well paid jobs, as casual or part-time
work etc. Women in traditional fields tend to be paid less than males and have fewer
opportunities for advancement. |
Access
and participation in engineering is low. Access & participation in science is stable
but below national average. Success & retention for women > 1.0. Participation at
postgraduate levels continues to be problematic but increasing |
Cross
group analysis by NESB, field of study, gender, SES, rural and isolated students, language
and country of birth. Ongoing analysis by faculty, dept, course etc.
Whole department profiles including staff and
students. |
To
increase access in engineering to system wide levels. To increase retention in
undergraduate programs and participation in postgraduate programs. |
- Women in non-traditional areas project (gender & academic
disciplines
- Inclusive curriculum program
- schools liaison
- recruitment from rural areas
- Postgraduate students
|
c) REPORT ON MERIT-BASED EQUITY SCHOLARSHIPS
The following table gives a breakdown by
Equity group.
1998 MERIT-BASED EQUITY SCHOLARSHIP RECIPIENTS BY
EQUITY GROUP
Equity group |
No. of
scholarships awarded |
Low SES |
7 |
Low SES &
NESB |
15 |
NESB &
disability |
1 |
Low SES &
rural/isolated |
3 |
Low SES, NESB
& disability |
2 |
Indigenous
Australians |
3 |
People from
rural and isolated areas |
1 |
TOTAL |
32 |
d) CONTACT OFFICERS
Manager, Equity and Social
Justice:
Robyn Jackson
Phone: (03) 9365 2249
Fax: (03)9365 2440 |
Coordinator, Diversity
Judith Cook
Phone: (03) 9688 4113
Fax: (03) 9688 4965 |
Disability Liaison
Co-ordinator:
Carolyn Wood
Phone: (03) 9365 2505
Fax: (03) 9365 2440
carolynwood@vut.edu.au |
|