Australian Government Department of Education, Science & Training DEST Archive DEST Search
Home  Sectors  DEST information  Minister's website  News & media  Calendar & dates
About this site 
Site Map | A-Z Index

courses | hecs/oldps | higher education home | higher education links
publications
| issues | research  | scholarships | statisticsuniversities

Victoria University of Technology

A)      EQUITY OBJECTIVES

Victoria University expresses its strong commitment to equity and social justice in its foundation documents including the Victoria University of Technology Act (1990) and in key planning documents. The University Council has incorporated the following term of reference into each of its committees: “To ensure decisions and recommendations to Council are in line with University equity and social justice policies and to seek advice where decisions may impact differentially on staff or students in ways that relate to characteristics included as grounds in State and Federal anti-discrimination legislation.”

Academic Board Regulations require it to: “consider annually the University’s staff and student profiles against equity and equal employment opportunity targets and plans set by the University” (Reg. 2.2A 10.1.b), and:

“set up and maintain processes for the accreditation and re-accreditation of Higher Education programs to ensure inclusive curriculum and good teaching practice”.(Reg. 2.2A 10.1.c)

The University’s Social Justice policy affirms that principles of equity and social justice be integrated into all the University structures, policies, procedures and plans. The policy on access and equity for students states: “Victoria University is committed to providing tertiary education (TAFE and Higher Education) in an accessible and equitable way.  … The aim is to ensure that the University’s student population reflects the composition proportionally of the groups represented in the University’s catchment area, including the Western Metropolitan Region of Melbourne.”

B)      STRATEGIES

The University’s equity strategies are outlined in Attachment 1 and consist of broad equity objectives and cross-linked specific objectives and strategies. The University recognises the richness of our diverse student population and responds in positive and pro-active ways and through the provision of academic and personal support services. Key aspects of the Equity Program are the ongoing development of inclusive curriculum and teaching practice and cultural change to create an inclusive environment.

The University funds the Equity and Social Justice Branch in order to ensure effort and focus on social justice issues and the implementation of the Equity Strategies and other related plans. These strategies are not only related directly to specific Equity groups but are also directed at systemic change. Specific services continue to be developed to cater for the needs of particular groups of students; eg Aborigines and Torres Strait Islanders and students with a disability. Inclusive practice and policy in the provision of generic services are developed in parallel..

An analysis of the University’s equity profile enabled the identification of strengths and weaknesses leading to the formulation of the following goals. The strategies in this report focus on these goals:

  • To increase the success rates of NESB and low SES students to the level of the whole student body.
  • To increase the successful participation of women in post-graduate study and disciplines where they are under-represented.
  • To increase the employment and employability of all students especially low SES, NESB, students with a disability, Koori students, and women in non-traditional fields.
  • To increase access for students with a disability and maintain success and retention at comparable levels.

Specific strategies

(more detail is provided in Attachment 2)

PASP (Personalised Access and Study Policy)

The Personalised Access and Study policy is based on the view that students as individuals can succeed to their potential when teaching, support and administrative systems are focussed on student expectations and needs. Students are assisted to meet their educational objectives, and supported through that process. The teaching and learning partnership between the student and the University is documented in a “compact”. Recommendations from Equity projects eg inclusive curriculum, have been incorporated into the PASP Action Plan. Professional development includes briefing on accommodating the support needs of students with a disability, support for Koori students and cross cultural communication skills. PASP is currently being evaluated in relation to its impact on the access, participation and retention of equity groups.

Cultural Diversity

The purpose of this program is to increase cultural sensitivity throughout the University particularly in the employment of staff and in the provision of direct service to students.   Cultural Diversity includes perspectives of the diverse student body including Kooris and other Aborigines and Torres Strait Islanders; people from diverse language and cultural backgrounds; persons with a disability; and gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender students.

Student Learning Unit (part of the Centre for Educational Development and Support)

The Unit provides assistance with English expression, mathematics, discipline specific terminology, assignment and essay writing. ESL expertise is available to students directly and also through consultancy to faculties. The Unit has initiated a postgraduate discussion group which has proven effective in supporting postgraduate students from non-traditional backgrounds. The Unit has proposals to develop on-line and traditional format modules which aim to increase access to support for Koori students and students with a disability.

Inclusive Curriculum

The University has established an inclusive curriculum program. The program covers gender, culture, language, class, disabilities and sexualities and includes Koori inclusive curriculum. Key elements are located in the functions of Academic Board, Equity and Social Justice Branch and the University’s Centre for Educational Development and Support. Recent initiatives include a project to address the problematic masculine culture in the sport and recreation discipline through curriculum and professional development and a Koori inclusive curriculum project.

Data Analysis and Performance Indicators

The University continues to develop and use effective and appropriate measures for assessing its own equity performance as well as utilise those required by DEETYA. Analysis of the University’s student profile and catchment area will continue with particular emphasis on using data to inform teaching and administrative practice. Development and application of performance indicators over the next triennium will focus on: low SES, NESB, employment of graduates and students with a disability and student progress processes. In particular this project will evaluate the impact of PAS and the effects on access and participation rates of various types of recruitment and enrolment procedures, rates of retention and success for designated groups, data analysis support to the Disability Liaison Unit and the establishment of an ongoing capacity within the Equity and Social Justice Branch for managing equity data and reporting internally and externally.

Disability: Generic Services

Victoria University will continue to implement its generic model for meeting the needs of students with a disability and to monitor service provision to ensure that the needs of students with a disability are catered for and services and processes are inclusive.

Women In Non-Traditional Fields Of Study

The University has designed a program to bring together and implement what is known about increasing successful participation of women in non-traditional fields of study including postgraduate study. Effective strategies include cultural change and inclusive curriculum. This will be cross discipline and cross faculty. The program will implement recommendations and follow up challenges highlighted in the inclusive curriculum report. Resources and consultancy is provided to staff in disciplines where the participation of women is low in order to create a more inclusive curriculum and environment for learning.


C)      PERFORMANCE

Summary Tables by Equity Group

Summary tables for each equity group in order of priority including historical data, performance indicators and other benchmarks where applicable.(Rural and Isolated are included at Appendix 3).

Low Socio-Economic Status

INDICATOR (Urban)

Reference Value

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

National average for 1997

Access (17-24 Yrs)

25

33.48

36.93

39.31

33.85%

37.26

36.84%

15.6

Participation (17-24 Yrs)

1.0

2.02

2.27

2.38

2.19

2.34

2.41

0.39

Success (17-24 Yrs)

1.0

0.97

0.96

0.94

0.95

NA

N/A

0.97

Retention (17-24 Yrs)

1.0

1.028

1.095

1.046

0.982

1.042

N/A

0.967

Access (25-64yrs)

25

27.10

29.01

29.5

29.19%

30.87

32.90%

13.7

Participation (25-64yrs)

1.0

1.98

1.69

1.77

1.75

1.78

1.89

0.36

Success (25-64yrs)

1.0

0.98

0.99

0.96

0.97

NA

N/A

0.96

Retention (25-64yrs)

1.0

0.976

1.0

1.057

1.026

1.048

N/A

0.982


Context

Performance analysis

Ongoing monitoring and data analysis

Equity goal

and performance indicators

Relevant strategies[1]

Region characterised by lower level of participation in higher education, higher unemployment and greater educational disadvantage than the metropolitan area as a whole.

Access & participation well above sector levels and increasing except for access for younger group. Retention has been at or above national performance. Success for the older group has been above national average.  Over a third of students are low SES.

Detailed cross group analysis by gender and NESB. Monitoring by fields will be identified in the Low SES and performance indicators projects.

To increase the success rate of low SES students to at least the national average by 2000 as measured by the Martin indicator for success.

  • PASP[2] including work placements and co-op arrangements
  • Student Leadership program [3]
  • Student Learning Unit
  • Inclusive curriculum
  • Non-discriminatory learning environment
  • return to study programs
  • access & preparatory programs
  • recruitment of non-school leavers.


Non-English Speaking Background

Indicator

Reference Value

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

National average 1997

Access

8.0%

14.25%

13.39%

9.75%

10.00%

8.46

5.15%

Participation

1.0

1.58

1.58

1.32

1.78

1.45

1.054

Success

1.0

0.93

0.92

0.94

N/A

N/A

0.97

Retention

1.0

1.062

1.067

0.959

1.052

N/A

1.054

 

Context

Performance analysis

Ongoing monitoring and data analysis

Equity goal

and performance indicators

Relevant strategies[4]

High proportion of non-English speaking background people in the region. Some groups over & some under represented at VUT.  Well developed relationships with communities eg the Maltese, African and Vietnamese communities.

Access & participation are well above national average. The drop over time is possibly due to regional demographics and immigration patterns. Retention has been relatively stable. Success increasing.

Cross group analysis by gender and SES.  Success patterns by Faculty and language group.  Student progress rates.

To increase the success rate of NESB students to at least the national average by 2000.

  • PASP
  • inclusive curriculum
  • Student Learning Unit
  • student progress
  • recommendations from LOTE project
  • cultural diversity program
  • University community partnerships strategy
  • University language and literacy policy
  • inclusive assessment strategies.


Students with a Disability

Indicator

Reference value

1996

1997

1998

1999

National Average for 1997

Access

4.0%

0.87%

1.18%

2.23%

2.10

1.36%

Participation

1.0

0.24

0.31

0.61

0.55

0.32

Success

1.0

1.05

0.98

N/A

N/A

0.93

Retention

1.0

N/A

1.088

0.984

N/A

0.996

 

Context

Performance analysis

Ongoing monitoring and data analysis

Equity goal and performance indicators

Relevant strategies[5]

Regional demographics provide data from a variety of sources but difficult to be precise.  Impact of regional characteristics on educational opportunities.

Access and participation rates have slipped slightly. Indicator trends for success and retention have slipped to just below 1.0 and need to be closely monitored .

Data analysed by campus, age and gender.  Numbers of students in Years 11 & 12 in the region.  Monitoring by mode of entry and impact of student progress processes.

To increase or maintain performance on all indicators to Martin reference values.

To increase success and retention indicators to previous levels (ie >1.00).

  • generic services project
  • Disability Liaison Officer
  • library advisory committees
  • individual support provision and analysis of needs
  • inclusive curriculum
  • Disability Action Plan
  • Student Learning Unit
  • PASP
  • Student Union self- advocacy project
  • Inclusive assessment practices


Women

Indicator

Reference Value

1995

1996

1997

Access

50%

55.78%

54.7%

54.45%

Participation

50%

53.7%

54.01%

53.47%

Engineering:             Access

Participation

 

N/A

9.90%

11.61%

11.47%

11.1%

Business:                   Access

Participation

 

N/A

54.35%

54.07%

53.58%

53.63%

Science:                     Access

Participation

 

N/A

37.26%

42.04%

36.78%

39.98%

HDR/UG

1.0

0.68

0.687

0.742

HDC/UG

1.0

0.61

0.738

0.788

Success

1.0

1.11

1.11

1.11

Retention

1.0

0.988

0.985

1.001


Context

Performance Analysis

Ongoing monitoring and data analysis

Equity goal and performance indicators

Relevant strategies[6]

In the region women have less formal qualifications than men. Women’s employment patterns are in less well paid jobs, as casual or part-time work. Women in traditional fields tend to be paid less than males and have fewer opportunities for advancement.

Access and participation in Engineering and Science have reduced slightly and are below national average. Participation in postgraduate courses continues to be problematic but improving at coursework level.

Cross group analysis by NESB, field of study, gender, rural and isolated students, language and country of birth. Ongoing analysis by faculty, dept, and course. Whole department profiles including staff and students.

To increase access in engineering to system wide levels. To increase retention in undergraduate programs and participation in postgraduate programs.

  • Women in non-traditional areas project (gender & academic disciplines)
  • Inclusive curriculum program
  • schools liaison
  • recruitment from rural areas
  • Women in Postgraduate Studies project
                   


D)        REPORT ON MERIT-BASED EQUITY SCHOLARSHIPS

Scholarships were advertised as follows: general information was provided on page 12 of the VTAC Guide 1999; information sheet was prepared and distributed through Student Administration and the Centre for Commencing Students; and information was made available to students from November onwards. Nominations were also sought from the Koori Development and Support Unit and from secondary schools in the western metropolitan region, which has low socio-economic status.

A central selection committee comprising representatives from the Equity and Social Justice Branch, Student Union and Centre for Commencing Students considered and ranked applicants against the following selection criteria: academic potential, membership of an equity group, educational disadvantage, special hardship, special educational disadvantage.

PRIORITIES / WEIGHTINGS

Consideration was given to applicants who demonstrated multiple disadvantage. Many of the applicants for scholarships were from both non–English speaking and low socio- economic backgrounds.

The following table gives a breakdown by of scholarship recipients Equity group for 1997, 1998 and 1999.

Equity group

No. of scholarships awarded 1997

No. of scholarships awarded

1998

No. of scholarships awarded

1999

Low SES

7

7

8

Low SES & NESB

6

15

12

NESB & disability

0

1

2

Low SES & rural/isolated

1

3

4

Low SES, NESB & disability

2

2

0

Indigenous Australians

0

3

4

People from rural and isolated areas

0

1

4

Disability and low SES

3

0

0

Disability

7

0

0

gender

Female= 14

Male= 12

Female= 14

Male= 18

Female= 15

Male= 19

TOTAL

26

32

34

e)        CONTACT OFFICERS

Manager, Equity and Social Justice:
Robyn Jackson

Phone: (03) 9365 2249

Fax: (03)9365 2578

Robyn.Jackson@vu.edu.au

Coordinator, Diversity:
Judith Cooke

Phone: (03) 9688 4598

Fax: (03) 9688 4965

Disability Liaison Coordinator:
Carolyn Wood

Phone:  (03) 9365 2505

Fax: (03) 9365 2578

Carolyn.Wood@vut.edu.au


Attachment 1 - Outline of Student equity strategies at Victoria University

  1. Data analysis and performance indicators
  2. Integration of equity and social justice principles in decision making
  3. Inclusive generic service delivery (includes Student Learning Unit)
  4. Equity initiatives scheme
  5. Personalised Access and Study Policy- student support and the provision of fully-articulated pathways from non-award preparatory and bridging to certificate, diploma, degree and postgraduate programs
  6. Women in non-traditional areas
  7. Women in Postgraduate study
  8. Graduate employment and student progress
  9. Generic service provision and individual support for students with a disabilit
  10. Inclusive curriculum
  11. Rural and isolated students
  12. The implementation of the TAFE Managing Diversity Plan
  13. The Indigenous Education Strategy
  14. Strategies to create and maintain an environment free of discrimination and harassment
  15. University community partnerships model.

Attachment 2 - Details of Specific Strategies

PASP  (personalised access and study policy)

This policy is a major equity initiative of the University which has developed out of the University’s substantive commitment to making education available to all. The Personalised Access and Study policy is based on the view that students as individuals can succeed to their potential when our teaching, support and administrative systems are focussed on student expectations and needs.

Victoria University believes that all students, regardless of background, will benefit as a consequence of the implementation and development of the Personalised Access and Study policy. The policy places the needs of students at the centre of all that the University does. The focus is on assisting students to meet their educational objectives, and supporting them through that process. The teaching and learning partnership between the student and the University is where all aspects of PASP converge.

Equity principles underlie this initiative and recommendations from Equity projects eg inclusive curriculum, were incorporated into the PASP Action Plan. Professional development will include briefing on accommodating the support needs of students with a disability, supports for Koori students and cross cultural communication skills.

Monitoring will identify points in the process that are sensitive to exclusion or inadequate support in order to remedy these and further develop PASP as an effective Equity strategy.

PASP attracts students from the Western Metropolitan Region of Melbourne and therefore supports low SES and NESB enrolments. The University will monitor the impact of PASP on the student profile paying particular attention to the Equity profile.

Cultural diversity

The purpose of this program is to increase cultural sensitivity throughout the University particularly in the employment of staff and in the provision of direct service to students. The program also provides a vehicle for the development and dissemination of materials and advice to assist staff and others to respond appropriately within the diverse environment at Victoria University of Technology.

Cultural Diversity includes perspectives of:

  • Kooris and other Aborigines and Torres Strait Islanders;
  • people from diverse language and cultural backgrounds;
  • persons with a disability;
  • gender;
  • people from different socio-economic backgrounds;
  • lesbians and gay men;
  • other groups who are part of society but not yet an acknowledged and valued part of Higher Education culture ; and
  • also includes the current dominant perspectives.

Student Learning Unit (now part of the Centre for Educational Development and Support)

The Unit provides assistance with English expression, mathematics, discipline- specific terminology, assignment and essay writing. ESL expertise is available to students directly and also through consultancy to faculties. The Unit has initiated a postgraduate discussion group which has proven effective in supporting postgraduate students from non-traditional backgrounds. The Unit has proposals to develop on-line and traditional format modules which aim to increase access to support for Koori students and students with a disability.

Inclusive curriculum

The University has established an inclusive curriculum program. The program covers gender, culture, language, class, disabilities and sexualities and includes Koori inclusive curriculum. Key elements are located in the functions of Academic Board, Planning Committee of Council, Equity and Social Justice Branch and the University’s Centre for Professional Development. Recent initiatives include a project to address the problematic masculine culture in the sport and recreation discipline through curriculum and professional development and a Koori inclusive curriculum project.

Women in non-traditional fields of study

The University has designed a program to bring together and implement what is known about increasing successful participation of women in non-traditional fields of study including postgraduate study. Effective strategies include cultural change and inclusive curriculum. This will be cross discipline and cross faculty. This project will implement recommendations and follow up challenges highlighted in the inclusive curriculum report. Resources and consultancy are provided to staff in disciplines where the participation of women is low in order to enable those departments to address the factors that create an exclusive environment and curriculum.

Disability: generic services

Victoria University will continue to implement its generic model for meeting the needs of students with a disability. The University will continue to monitor service provision to ensure that the needs of students with a disability are catered for and services and processes are inclusive. Key strategies include:

  • a recurrently funded DLO position;
  • direct service provision as well as consultancy to faculties and departments to facilitate a high standard of accommodation to the support needs of students with a disability;
  • the completion of a three year project (1997 to 1999) to embed the generic model more firmly into the University’s operations;
  • monitoring and evaluating service provision;
  • utilising a specially designed database to enhance the above;
  • continuation of the Minor Works program to rectify physical access problems on each campus and an ongoing commitment to physically accessible new spaces;
  • library contact people and Library Disability Advisory Groups on each campus;
  • inclusive curriculum;
  • examination of the feasibility of on-line technology for students with gaps in their attendance for example due to recurrent illness;
  • provision of opportunities to develop self-advocacy skills.

Postgraduate students

Victoria University has a significant proportion of women, people from a non-English speaking background, students with a disability and low socio-economic status at post-graduate level.  A need for links, networks and peer support among post-graduate students was identified. A pilot mentoring program for postgraduate students from equity groups as, an Equity project, includes a detailed analysis of the post-graduate student profile. The 1997 post-graduate profile indicates that 50% of commencing PhD students are women and that 48% are from non-English speaking backgrounds.

A survey of post-graduate students has been conducted to identify support needs and improve the quality of experience for postgraduate students especially those from Equity groups. This strategy focuses on retention and success for all Equity groups. Recommendations from the project will be implemented through the University’s Postgraduates Studies Unit, Academic Board and the Postgraduate Students Association.

The University will continue to survey research students annually to assess the quality of post-graduate supervision, to identify concerns and improve the experience of post-graduate students generally. Programs for postgraduate students and their supervisors (eg cross cultural supervision) are conducted. Recommendations from the postgraduate project will be incorporated into these programs and into student orientation.

Data analysis and performance indicators

The University will continue to develop and use effective and appropriate measures for assessing its own equity performance as well as utilise those required by DEETYA. Analysis of the University’s student profile and catchment area will continue with particular emphasis on using data to inform teaching and administrative practice. Development and application of performance indicators over the next triennium will focus on: Low SES, NESB, Employment of graduates and students with a disability. In particular this project will evaluate the impact of PAS and the effects on access and participation rates of various types of recruitment and enrolment procedures, rates of retention and success for designated groups, data analysis support to the Disability Liaison Unit and the establishment of ongoing capacity within Equity and Social Justice Branch for managing equity data and reporting internally and externally.

Equity initiatives scheme

The University maintains a collaborative tendering process which encourages staff to develop and implement proposals in priority equity areas. The HEEP Grant is allocated via this process based on equity performance indicators, the equity plan and principles of cultural change and inclusive practice. Projects are initiated and funded based on the key elements of inclusive teaching and curriculum and cultural change.

See Attachment 4 for a report on the expenditure of the 1998 HEEP funds.

REVIEW AND EVALUATION OF STRATEGIES

Evaluation of equity performance at Victoria University is based on quantitative performance indicators including the Martin indicators and qualitative indicators based on an Equity change model developed and utilised by the University over several years. These indicators and other more specific ones are applied to all HEEP funded projects. The basic criterion against which strategies are assessed is: to what extent does the strategy contribute to increasing the successful participation of people from designated Equity groups in higher education? [7]

Evaluation and application (eg implementation or incorporation of findings into practice) of outcomes are included in contracts for all equity projects. Projects are not “stand alone” or “one offs” but are linked into the system in significant ways eg support by the Dean, action research methodology. Each project is worked up through a process of answering the following questions:

  • What is the problem or barrier being considered here?
  • Is it related to access, participation, success or retention?
  • What aspects of the system or curriculum contribute to the problem?
  • How does the solution or action proposed address these systemic factors?
  • What needs to be done to ensure the solution is lasting? Is embedded?

The University is committed to ongoing review and monitoring of mainstream processes, services and support. For the current triennium the focus of this review will be related to:

  • non-English speaking background success;
  • low socioeconomic background success;
  • women into postgraduate studies; and
  • access and success for students with a disability.

These criteria are made explicit in the funding process.


Attachment 3 – MARTIN INDICATORS: RURAL

Indicator

Reference Value

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

National average 1997

Access

23.3%

6.49%

7.04%

8.04%

7.92%

7.88%

18.28

Participation

1.0

0.27

0.27

0.29

0.31

0.31

0.717

Success

1.0

1.06

1.07

1.07

N/A

N/A

0.99

Retention

1.0

0.951

1.002

0.998

1.004

N/A

0.972

MARTIN INDICATORS: ISOLATED

Indicator

Reference Value

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

National average 1997

Access

0.3%

0.02%

0.03%

0.08%

0.09%

0.09%

1.92%

Participation

1.0

0.15

0.17

0.21

0.26

0.37

0.393

Success

1.0

1.02

0.81

0.75

N/A

N/A

0.95

Retention

1.0

0.710

1.031

0.797

1.157

N/A

0.902

RURAL AND ISOLATED STRATEGIES AND PERFORMANCE SUMMARY

Context

Performance analysis

Ongoing monitoring and data analysis

Equity goal

and performance indicators

Relevant strategies[8]

The University’s commitment to the Western Metropolitan Region of Melbourne as expressed in the University’s Act.

Access & participation both low but recruitment of this group is not a high priority for Victoria University of Technology except in a couple of specific areas. Some improvement in access and participation of isolated.  Success and retention trend data needed

Further analysis of retention of these students by socio-economic status.

To maintain current levels of access and participation.

  • provision of accommodation at Sunbury campus and Student Village.
  • Faculty of Engineering recruitment in rural areas
  • support services available to all students
  • provision of appropriate support in University residences.
  • Targeted rural recruitment.


Attachment 4: Report on expenditure of 1998 HEEP grant

PROJECT NAME

PURPOSE/OUTLINE

AMOUNT OF 1998 GRANT ALLOCATED

OUTCOMES/

PROGRESSS

Individual support for students with a disability

To provide specialised equipment and services not normally provided

$30,000

Support provided and allocation accounted for

Equity Projects Administration

To provide assistance in the further development and management of projects to ensure maximum effectiveness and availability of project outcomes

$20,000

Administrative Research Assistant employed. Project Management Database developed

Data analysis and performance indicator project (Continued)

To develop and establish appropriate equity outcome and retention performance indicators for VU utilising the  Martin report as part of the overall development of performance indicators within the VU Strategic Plan

$10,800

Project extended to August 1999. Report presented to Equity Grants Forum, May 1999

The integration of two language and learning components to enhance the learning outcomes of low SES and NESB background Business Law students at the Sunbury campus

The project’s purpose is to integrate two language and learning components which have been developed to enable these equity group students to access the culture and content of the subject Business Law and to improve their learning outcomes

$10,463

Funds transferred. Presented project to Equity Grants Forum, May 1999

Development and evaluation of web-based instructional materials to promote gender-inclusive curriculum objectives in statistics and research methods teaching and learning in Psychology

The main aim of the project is to evaluate whether and how learning outcomes in Psychology research methods are enhanced for women using a web-based instructional strategy which incorporates an on-line “virtual community” of learners and which, in theory, should provide students with greater opportunities for structured dialogue with lecturers and for self-paced revision of concepts than can be achieved solely through lecture/tutorial format

$9,700

Funds transferred. Presented project to Equity Grants Forum, May 1999

Koori Cultural Heritage and Curriculum Inclusivity

A transdisciplinary project which seeks to develop Koori inclusivity into all facets of subject design; develop educational and interpretative material pertaining to Koori cultural heritage at St Albans campus and within the Brimbank municipality

$7,487

Draft contract prepared. Funds still to be transferred. Presented project to Equity Grants Forum, May 1999

Implementing Strategies to Improve Participation Rates of Women in Higher Research Degrees

This project will document and analyse participation rates of women in degrees at VU at undergraduate and postgraduate levels. The project will then work with Faculties, Schools and Centres to develop strategies to be implemented during 1999 and 2000 to improve women’s participation in research higher degrees

$16,750

Funds transferred. Progress report presented to Equity Grants Forum, May 1999

Assisting NESB students’ writing skills development

The project involves the development of self-access learning modules which focus on educating students in conventions of academic writing at the micro-skills level. The materials will be relevant for , and available to, students at all levels of study in the Faculty of Engineering and Science in hardcopy and on-line formats

$17,059

Funds transferred. Progress report presented to Equity Grants Forum, May 1999

Gender and Sexualities: Inclusive Curriculum in Human Movement

The project involves action research and other qualitative measures designed to introduce and evaluate gender, sexualities and equity curriculum changes in the B.App.Sci   (Human Movement)

$18,409

Funds transferred. Project delayed due to Ethics Committee queries. Pilot project presented to Equity Grants Forum, May 1999

Community Responsive Education and Partnership: Inclusive University Education in the context of a Rural Indigenous Australian community

The B.Ed (Nyerna Studies) is a new four year degree program taught at Echuca/Moama. The primary goal of the course is to provide an inclusive and community-responsive, fully-accredited, teacher education program and offer multiple exit points including a BA (Nyerna Studies) after three years. This project aims to document and investigate through action research this innovative educational pedagogy, restructuring and reform in the University and the impact of this reform on University communities in Melbourne and north-west Victoria

$15000

Funds transferred

1998 Equity Grant

$143,000

 
TOTAL AMOUNT ALLOCATED

(the difference in total amount funded from 1997 carryover)

$155,665

 



[1] See brief descriptions of strategies in this section and at Appendix 2.

[2] Personalised Access and Study Policy

[3] Funds have been set aside for this project and it is in the process of development.

[4] See brief descriptions of strategies in this section and at Appendix 2.

[5] See brief descriptions of strategies in this section and at Appendix 2.

[7] “Successful participation” implies access, participation, retention and success plus other descriptions which may be defined by the University . eg employment

[8] See brief descriptions of strategies in this section and at Appendix 2.


 

 

Return to the Top of the Page


contact details  |  search  |  archive search  |  publications  |  site map  | subscribe
career information
| education network australia (EdNA)  
australian education international | prime minister's web site 

Any comments or queries should be sent to: wwweditor@dest.gov.au

This page was last updated on Monday, 16 May 2005
Department of Education, Science and Training
Copyright © Commonwealth of Australia
DETST Web Site Privacy Statement
Disclaimer