|
Mission statement and strategic plan The University of Canberra currently defines its mission asThe education of people for professional careers, carried out in a professional way, and the continuing education of professionals throughout their working lives. In 1992 the University produced its first strategic planning paper, Strategic Directions, which set out the Universitys role, based on its history, expertise and traditions. Since 1992 the University has focused on that role by: preparing beginners; educating practitioners in new aspects of their work; providing the intellectual focus for the professions; and developing the knowledge bases on which professionalism depends. These are the Universitys core activities. The Universitys Strategic Plan for 1998-2000 is based on Strategic Directions and provides a global view of the Universitys focus and direction for the next triennium. In addition, each of the faculties and divisions has its own strategic plan which addresses the more detailed concerns appropriate for an element of the University. The full version of the Strategic Plan sets out the strategies and tasks necessary to achieve its objectives and identifies groups, such as Academic Boards Education Committee, to evaluate progress. Nominated operational plans will enable them to identify useful performance indicators and methods of evaluation. The strategic plan is designed to operate on a rolling triennium basis so that at the end of 1998 the University will be developing plans for 2001 against the findings of its evaluation mechanisms and the modifications to the document that these will produce. Indicators for monitoring the Universitys operations and progress against its strategic plan are at different levels of development. As there is an inevitable tendency to value what is measured, the University is being careful to ensure that it measures that which it values. There is a large set of publicly accessible higher education contextual data available which provides a background against which the Universitys own indicators can be used. These data should be used with care, and with some sense of their limitations. Strategies and performance Teaching and learning Objectives: The Universitys first objective is the education of the professional sector of Australian enterprise and industry through programs which focus on student needs, are intellectually stimulating and appropriate to the professions.Strategies: Designated strategies include:
Key indicators: It is most useful at this stage to provide some key indicators that give an historical basis to the Universitys current performance: 1. Employment and/or postgraduate studies of UC graduatesThe GCCA data for the period 1994-97 indicate that UC graduate employment rates for 1994-97 typically matched or exceeded national averages although the regional impact on graduate employment in 1997 from reductions in Commonwealth employment and associated changes to the ACT economy is apparent. Graduate starting salaries similarly reflected little variation from national average figures when account was taken of regional market conditions. In brief, UC graduate achievements in gaining employment at appropriate salary levels differed little from the high band within national figures for 1994-97. Employment and/or Postgraduate Studies of UC Graduates
In view of the Universitys emphasis on education for the professions it is not surprising that a smaller percentage of UC graduates than the national average seek or need to progress immediately to full-time postgraduate studies. Those choosing to progress directly, however, report ready acceptance into preferred postgraduate programs and universities. The University believes that, in the context of its own mission, these results can be interpreted as highly satisfactory. 2. Satisfaction of UC graduates with their courses The GCCA data are not always meaningful for any University at the level of course because of sampling and classification problems. The data over the period 1994-97 indicate that an increasing percentage of CEQ respondents in each major field of study and for UC in aggregate are expressing overall satisfaction (a 12 per cent increase since 1995 in OSI) and satisfaction with the quality of teaching (a 27 per cent increase since 1995 in GTS), with almost 90 per cent satisfied with the generic skills acquired through their courses (GSS). Satisfaction of UC Graduates with Their Courses
3. Progression and completion rates for UC students in first degree courses UC routinely monitors the progress of its students. The internal tracking data at the level of subject and course for particular student groups and sub-groups, confirmed by DETYA analyses at more aggregated levels after adjustment for field of study and demographic background, indicate that the progression and completion rates of UC students are a little higher than national averages. Data used by DETYA to calculate UCs student retention and progression relative to other universities (shown below) indicate, for example, that 79 per cent of UCs 6534 students who could have continued their courses into 1995 (excluding the 1929 who had completed their courses the previous year) did so (while the normal expectation would be 76 per cent, having regard to field of study patterns and demographic characteristics of UC students relative to national data). Thus DETYAs calculated retention performance index for UC in 1995 was 103 (against a national mean of 100 and a standard deviation of 10). UCs index for both retention and progression in 1995 and 1996 was in each case, therefore, a little higher than national averages. Retention and Progression of UC Students
Generic skills and attributes of graduates from the University of Canberra The University strives to develop in its students generic skills and attributes which will facilitate graduates contribution to their professions and the society in which they live. In keeping with the mission of the University of Canberra, the particular emphasis has been on defining generic skills and attributes of graduates expected to become professionals. All graduates from the University of Canberra are expected to have developed the following skills and attributes: Communication: Graduates are expected to have general abilities to express professional knowledge, ideas and opinions, with confidence and clarity, to a variety of audiences for a variety of purposes. Information literacy: Graduates are expected to be able to identify, analyse, evaluate, interpret and present information. This necessitates them being able to identify, use and critically evaluate information technology. Problem-solving: Graduates are expected to be able to apply problem-solving processes, identify problems and opportunities, analyse the main features of given problems and implement strategies for their resolution. Team work: Graduates are expected to be able to work productively in different types of groups. Professional attributes: Graduates are expected to act professionally and ethically in the practice of their profession. Lifelong learning: Graduates are expected to continue to practice their learning skills to ensure that their professional practice is underpinned by current knowledge, skills and training. Other data which provide a perspective on UC teaching and learning
The commitment of sufficient resources is critical to the achievement of the Universitys goals, and for this reason several input measures are used by the University to monitor its performance. The University plans, however, to move toward a more outcome-oriented approach as far as possible. The University intends to use GCCAs CEQ instrument to undertake its own survey of its final year students. The first of these surveys will be undertaken in Semester 2, 1998. As well as its work through the Centre for the Enhancement of Learning, Teaching and Scholarship (CELTS), the University also undertakes surveys of its first-year students, the results of which are used to inform the Universitys teaching processes. Following the development of the Universitys teaching and learning plan, faculties have now developed their own teaching and learning plans and will report on faculty level implementation of specific aspects of the University plan. The University of Canberra has been formally established as a university since 1990 and is developing an historical data base so that Council and VCAC can monitor the Universitys performance over time. The development of performance indicators is an incremental process and the Universitys regular review processes are being further developed to elicit more concrete data from employers and professional associations that will indicate the levels of employer satisfaction with generic skills acquisition, as well as professional expertise. Data will also be sought to report on faculty/school student evaluation mechanisms, and to identify priority areas for improvement as well as models of best-practice teaching. Research Objectives: To create, collect, advance and disseminate knowledge and inquiry in ways which are closely linked with and enrich the Universitys professional focus and that strengthen the knowledge and intellectual base of the professions.Strategies: To achieve the Universitys aims, UC will:
Indicators The University is developing a set of indicators of research performance based on the construction of a full-time equivalent research (FTER) workforce. For this purpose, all full-time research academic staff are weighted at 1.0 and all teaching-and-research staff are weighted at 0.3; teaching-only staff are not included. This construction has face-validity and incorporates the choices available to a University in designing a research strategy. Work has begun on historical data analysis to provide a data base for the 1990s. The data for 1996 have been analysed completely: in that year UC research performance was between average and high for performance across the whole system. The following table displays research performance for a number of universities familiar to us.
Consideration is being given to publishing the index; for the moment it is being used to help shape the Universitys research strategy. Other data which provide a perspective on UC research
Student services Objectives: Provide a wide range of services and facilities to support the scholarly development of students and to facilitate their transition through academic life.Strategies: Our services and facilities cover:
Indicators: Three key indicators are used to measure the Universitys performance: accessibility, availability and assistance for students. 1. Accessibility: The goal has been on-campus access to all of our services for students, to enhance their ability to undertake their studies successfully and to make them feel they belong to the academic community.Internet access
General computer laboratories open on a 24-hour basis, seven days a week during term; Availability of essential readings in library now greater than 90 per cent.
The historical data base is still in preparation. Management Objectives: A management structure which is effective and cost-efficient in ensuring a University community which works cooperatively to further the Universitys academic and entrepreneurial purposes. Strategies: In December 1997, the Universitys three-divisional management structure was reviewed to ascertain how management could be more responsive and cost-effective. The following implementation of the reviews recommendations is intended to facilitate improvement in communication. 1. Divisional structure: The University has recently moved to implement a two-divisional structure (a diagram of the management structure is available on request). The management structure is now arguably the flattest in any Australian higher education institution. The flatness of the structure acts to increase communication at all levels. 2. Team approaches: Within divisions, organisational units are as broadly based as possible to maximise the use of talent and expertise and to allow for more broadly based understanding and shared responsibility of the work being undertaken. Importantly, issues identified by the University as problematic are addressed by teams, membership of which is drawn across faculties, divisions and sections. The work of the teams is as clearly defined as possible as are the timelines for their reporting. The teams report their findings and recommendations to VCAC. Indicators: Indicators of management efficiency are, of course, reported through reviews and their recommendations. The outcomes of the 1997 divisional review will be examined and evaluated in July 1998. 1. Days lost through industrial action
*Related to Government policy, not to actions of university management 2. Numbers of AIRC actions for administrative or managerial causes
3. Numbers of formal staff grievances raised at University level
4. Occupational health and safety The number of accident reports received each year is declining in proportion to staff and student numbers while the number of notifiable reports has dropped. Accordingly, the Universitys workers compensation premium was reduced by 19.3 per cent in 1996 and 27.3 per cent in 1997. 5. NACUBO benchmarking dataThe University has participated in the NACUBO benchmarking process which covers a broad range of administrative activities. The first two years have been devoted to data collection and validation exercises. The full benefits will not be achieved until the University has long-term comparative data. Other data which provide a perspective on UC management
Community service Objectives: The strategic plan identifies the provision of intellectual leadership and service to the professions, industry, governments and to the wider society, particularly the ACT and local region, as one of its key objectives.Strategies: Strategies to achieve its community service objectives include:
Indicators: 1. Partnership agreements with employers, government agencies, professional associations Over the last two years, the University has entered into a number of agreements to provide suites of professional education and training for organisations such as the Australian Customs Service, the Australian Bureau of Statistics, the Australian Army and DETYA. The University is actively pursuing links and cooperative activities with local government authorities to provide a structured interaction with local community organisations. Evaluation and measurement indices will be developed to report on these activities. 2. Memoranda, agreements with international institutionsThe University has set up an international partnerships arm, UCARDI, to bring together universities in other countries which have a mission and structure similar to the University of Canberra. So far the partnerships represent some fifty universities in 20 countries. The University is developing indicators of the efficacy of these arrangements. Collectively, UC staff devote a substantial amount of time and effort to community service activities - to leadership and service in public intellectual life; to the economic, social and cultural development of the ACT and of Australia and the protection of the physical and cultural environment, and to the development of the professions. Such service is regarded as an important ingredient in the delivery of quality teaching and research and is recognised in the Universitys promotions procedures. Other data which provide a perspective on UC community services
Professor Don Aitkin, Vice-Chancellor Tel: (02) 6201 5001 Fax: (02) 6201 5036 Email: daa@adminserver.canberra.edu.au
Professor Meredith Edwards, Deputy Vice-Chancellor Tel: (02) 6201 5060 Fax: (02) 6201 5384 Email: mae@adminserver.canberra.edu.au
|