Monash University

Institutional mission

To be one of the finest and most innovative modern universities in the world and to lead the way in higher education in Australia [The Monash Plan 1998–2002].

Statement of commitment to quality assurance and improvement

Monash is committed to the highest quality outcomes in teaching, learning, research, management and student support, as well as a wide range of professional and community activities, both nationally and internationally, and across all of its diverse campuses. It is committed to an over-arching culture of quality based on explicitly defined responsibilities in the pursuit of continuous improvement in all of its activities and the scrutiny of its standards, processes and systems. The University’s rigorous approach to quality assurance and enhancement is encapsulated in the Monash planning and review cycle.

Achievements in the area of quality assurance

The high quality of our activities has been recognised nationally by the Committee for Quality Assurance in Higher Education (CQAHE) which placed Monash in the top band for all three main strands of University endeavour: teaching and learning, research outcomes and community service, and internationally by the Global Alliance for Transnational Education and in both the 1997 and 1998 Asiaweek surveys of Asia’s top universities. In late 1997 the University’s Distance Education Centre was awarded quality certification under the International Organisation for Standardization’s ISO 9001 standard on quality management systems. In The Good Universities Guide Monash has been consistently rated as a prestigious university, acknowledged for its high standard of programs and educational quality assurance.

Monash planning and review cycle

The Monash Plan 1999–2003 sets clear goals and future directions for the University and continues a rolling five-year process of robust institutional planning and development which ensures that strategic decision making is linked to budget allocations and informed by sound monitoring and scheduled reviews. The Monash Plan, and the suite of rolling three year operational plans which support it, are key elements in the University’s quality assurance strategy.

During the coming years, the University will refine the Monash planning and review cycle to more closely integrate quality improvement and enhancement processes with strategic planning, thereby featuring quality assessment and improvement more formally in the day-to-day activities of the University. Monash already has in place a wide range of quality assurance activities, described fully in the 1993, 1994 and 1995 submissions to the national CQAHE and the 1997 matrix prepared for the Higher Education Council. Information derived from a more comprehensive and systematic University quality assurance framework will be fed into the annual updating of the Monash Plan, especially its targets and strategies, and the revision of the operational plans which underpin it.

The Vice-Chancellor has executive responsibility for the implementation and monitoring of the Monash Plan and reports directly to the University Council via its Corporate Planning Committee. Monash has adopted a coordinated approach to both the devolution of responsibility and monitoring of progress to faculties, relevant administrative units and committees, particularly the Academic Board, the Education Committee and the Off-shore Quality Assurance Committee which are largely assigned the remit for quality assurance. In relation to research the University has established the Committee of Associate Deans (Research) and the PhD and Scholarships Committee. This system of accountability is designed to instil confidence in the quality of Monash programs and services.

University-wide performance indicators form part of Monash’s overall strategic monitoring and review process. The data below have been collected for the period 1996-98 and highlight the University’s performance in respect of quality assurance against each of its core activities. Monash uses both qualitative and quantitative measures of performance which, when taken together, provide a more balanced assessment of the quality of the University’s activities.

1. Major goals for educating scholars and professionals

Monash seeks to develop and maintain a flexible teaching and learning environment which embodies three key themes – innovation, engagement and internationalisation – and which provides undergraduate and postgraduate education of the highest quality.

Objectives

Key Performance Indicators

  1. To improve and develop the Monash curriculum in accordance with the values and principles of The Monash Plan, key education policies and the major dimensions for learning namely: understanding, lifelong learning, engagement, innovation and internationalisation
  2. To improve and enhance student learning through student-centred flexible and innovative approaches to learning and teaching, especially those enabled by new educational technologies
  3. To improve and foster excellence in teaching through: establishing an improved reward structure to acknowledge excellence and innovation; extending staff development programmes and opportunities; and strengthening structural and resourcing support related to teaching and learning
  4. To improve governance of academic programs and standards, quality and quality assurance for learning and teaching
  5. To improve the strategic development of educational programs
  • Number of students enrolled with an equivalent national tertiary education rank (ENTER) score in the top five per cent as a proportion of commencing school leavers
  • Number of students by funding source
  • Median Tertiary Education Rank (TER) scores
  • Proportion of fields of study at Monash where the overall satisfaction of graduates with the quality of the courses is at or above the national average (as per the Course Experience Questionnaire - CEQ)
  • First-time graduates in either full-time employment/full-time study/part-time work and not looking for work, as a proportion of all graduates
  • Monash’s share of first and second Victorian Tertiary Admissions Centre (VTAC) preferences as a proportion of total first and second VTAC preferences

The following key strategies are designed to pursue the above objectives.

Key strategies

Performance Targets

  1. Maintain national and international recognition of the quality of Monash programs and awards by further developing the Monash Qualifications Framework

1999

2. Review strategies for recognising high quality teaching and teaching innovation

December 1999

3. Develop policies and quality assurance processes for cross-faculty and cross-institutional programs

June 1999

4. Review policies and processes to ensure continuous quality improvement in teaching and learning and in academic support and administrative services

December 1999

5. Strengthen procedures for quality assurance of non-award offerings

June 1999

6. Establish a process for formally reviewing departments and faculties

June 1999
7. Undertake in-depth strategic reviews, for example:
  • Science at Monash
  • Arts at Monash
  • Role and responsibilities of campus directors
  • Role and direction of Peninsula Campus
Completed. Outcomes have been integrated with the strategic and operational planning processes
8. Assess relevance of academic programs:
  • Demonstrate the University's continued acceptance by students as a quality provider of education through the growth in off-shore and distance education enrolments, and the maintenance of the level of intake of on-campus Australian students
  • Conduct longitudinal studies of student characteristics, expectations and attitudes
  • Conduct regular student feedback on subjects' organisation and operations
  • Administer voluntary surveys by individual teachers to assess students' perception of their teaching performance (MonQueST)
  • Conduct regular student satisfaction surveys of library and student services
 

Ongoing

 

 

 

Targets met 1994, 1997 On-going

On-going

 

On-going

 

Completed. Outcomes being actioned

9. Ensure the quality of teaching through consistent and rigorous academic governance by maintaining entry requirements, continuously assessing and improving the quality of programs and teaching activities and protecting academic standards particularly at the point of exit

On-going
 

Performance in learning and teaching activities against objectives

The University’s ability to attract high quality school leavers to its undergraduate programs continues to improve. The number of students enrolled at Monash University has increased over the period 1996 to 1998, from 41 543 to 42 207. The University continues to attract a large number of international students, with a 22 per cent increase in the number of enrolments over the three years. Median TER scores for Monash have steadily increased from 77.8 in 1996 to 79.3 in 1998. Although there are variations across campuses, at its largest campus, Clayton, the median TER score has been consistently high - 82.9 in 1996 and 83.9 in 1998. Monash’s share of school leaver’s first and second VTAC preferences, as at May of each year, has been maintained over the period 1996-98 at around 18 per cent. Data are still being further developed on these indicators.

Monash graduates’ attributes

A goal of the Monash Plan is that courses will enable graduates to: enhance their intellectual and cultural curiosity as a preparation for autonomous, self-directed, life-long learning; seek the imaginative approach to problems and to attempt always to set the agenda rather than follow the well trodden path; have the knowledge, competence, skills and attitudes that will enable them to lead and accomplish in their chosen employment fields in Australia or overseas; have a broad and critical understanding of knowledge in order to encourage and enable a continuing professional approach to work, community responsibilities and personal development; and have an understanding of different cultures that enriches experience and challenges assumptions. [The Monash Plan 1999-2003]

Monash has set in place a number of key strategies in its Learning and Teaching Operational Plan to ensure the development and maintenance of these attributes in courses; course monitoring, course reviews; course and subject approval forms; award specifications; enhancement plans and assessment policies. Monash will continue to regularly assess the quality of its teaching activities by: undertaking annual peer review of programs; establishing appropriate benchmarks for its programs; establishing course advisory committees with both external academic and industry membership; closely liaising with professional bodies, including those which offer professional membership through external accreditation processes; and, tracking student entry and exit attributes.

Graduate destination survey (GDS)

Monash continues to successfully provide high quality and relevant undergraduate and postgraduate education.

Table 1: Graduate Destination Survey - Monash Graduates Under 25#

1996

(%)

1997

(%)

Monash graduates under 25 available for FT employment

69.6

58.1

State

68.0

65.5

National

69.7

66.9

Monash graduates under 25 available for FT employment who are actually employed in FT employment

82.2

81.7

State

76.8

75.1

National

78.4

77.2

Monash graduates under 25 in full-time study

23.1

34.6

State

23.3

26.1

National

22.2

25.1

#Source: GCCA, 1997 Graduate Destination Survey (April 1998)

The outcomes of the Graduate Destination Survey showed that over the 1996-97 period Monash graduates under 25 were pursuing their studies at a considerably higher rate than elsewhere in Australia. Monash graduates have continued to be in high demand by employers, once again holding a labour market share well above the national and Victorian norm. In part this attests to the quality of Monash programs, in that Monash graduates under 25 in some fields of study enter employment at a higher rate than their counterparts elsewhere in Australia. The proportion of Monash graduates seeking full-time employment has fallen significantly relative to the rest of Australia. The trend to lower unemployment rates for Monash graduates is a welcome improvement and further attests to the relevance and attractiveness of the University’s programs and the esteem in which it is regarded by employers of skilled professionals.

Course experience questionnaire (CEQ)

Overall, the low institutional response rate (1995:58.9 per cent, 1996:58.2 per cent), coupled with the small size of the samples used in the analysis of the fields of study, generated data from the CEQ which was unreliable in terms of deriving valid conclusions about students’ perceptions about the quality of Monash teaching. The University notes that doubt remains as to the validity of the CEQ as an instrument for use in institutional-level performance indicators. Monash supports improvement to the CEQ and in that context will be making strenuous efforts to improve the overall response rate and those achieved in specific fields.

Monash outcomes in relation to the CEQ scales "good teaching", "generic skills" and "overall satisfaction" showed the high percentage of students who were broadly satisfied with the quality of Monash teaching over the 1995-96 period. The overall student satisfaction indicator for this period showed that Monash was slightly higher than the system-wide percentage and actually performed as expected given the University’s subject and student mix.

Table 2: Graduates’ Perception of Course Experience#

1995

1996

Percentage of students broadly satisfied with:

Monash

All*

Monash

All*

  • Good teaching

69

73

69

74

  • Generic skills

85

86

86

87

  • Overall satisfaction

89

88

90

89

#Source: DETYA CEQ outcomes data (18 June 1998) *Percentage of students across all Australian universities

The University’s provision of high quality outcomes for its graduates is also reflected in its consistently higher than the national average retention rates and its maintenance of the national norm in student progression rates.

Table 3: Higher Education Outcome Indicators#

1995

1996

Monash

All*

Monash

All*

  • Retention rate

80

78

79

78

  • Student progress rate

86

86

85

85

#Source: The Characteristics and Performance of Higher Education Institutions (DETYA Occasional Paper Series, November 1998) *Percentage of students across all Australian universities

2. Major goals for advancing and applying knowledge

Monash seeks to: advance and apply knowledge across all academic disciplines; maintain a vigorous postgraduate program in which new scholars and researchers learn the principles of quality scholarship and research; and to collaborate nationally and internationally in the pursuit and application of knowledge.

Objectives

Key Performance Indicators

  1. To increase the quantity and quality of the University’s research output
  2. To strengthen the University’s research training program
  • Total level of research income
  • Total level of national competitive grants income
  1. To develop research activities which support quality developments in the University’s educational programs locally and internationally
  2. To promote public awareness of the University’s research achievements
  3. To strengthen the University’s research links with other research organisations, nationally and internationally, and with industry and other users of research
  4. To improve research competitiveness
  • Higher degree research completions
  • Percentage of teaching and research and research only staff who have published in at least one of the following DETYA categories – A1, B1, D1 and E1

The following strategies are designed to achieve the above objectives.

Key Strategies

Performance Targets

1. Implement the Research Management Plan

1999

2. Implement a framework for research engagement profiles for academic staff

Review annually

3. Develop strategies to stimulate research training in association with Monash’s major research partners, and strategic collaborations with research graduates who return to their home countries

June 1999

4. Develop strategies to ensure that academic staff on overseas campuses are engaged in research of an international standard

June 1999

5. Continue to review quality assurance policies and procedures and identify additional ways of supporting and rewarding research excellence

Review annually

6. Improve the quality of research performance assessment:

  • Improve the quality of the research bibliometric database
  • Develop a strategy for measuring and improving the quality of research training

 

December 1998

Review annually

Performance in research activities against objectives

The value of the University’s total research income increased from 1996 to 1998, from $49.9m to $51.3m (estimated). The total level of competitive grants income rose between 1996 and 1997, from $26.4m to $26.6m. However it slightly declined in 1998 to an estimated $24.8m. The number of higher degree research completions at Monash rose between 1996 and 1997, from 409 to 443.

The proportion of teaching and research and research only staff who have published in at least one of the priority categories increased between 1996 and 1997 from 48.8 per cent to 53.6 per cent.

3. Major goals for becoming global

Monash seeks to become a global university in a way which broadens the opportunities available to Australian based students and staff, strengthens its capacity to perform its national and international roles and reinforces the resource base of the University.

Objectives

Key Performance Indicators

  1. To incorporate international perspectives and outcomes in the Monash curriculum
  2. To facilitate, through the Monash Global Program, the movement of students from one country to another and enable a continuous educational experience of the highest quality
  3. To enter into partnership agreements which will strategically assist faculties to expand their activities
  • Number of international students by level of study - bridging/ undergraduate/ postgraduate
  • Number of international students by on-campus, on-shore/on-campus, off-shore/other off-shore
  • Percentage of local students carrying out part of their award courses overseas

The following strategies are aimed at moving Monash towards the above objectives.

Key Strategies

Performance Targets

1. Review and further develop international projects and activities:

  • Extend review processes for off shore programs
  • Review all activities in overseas academic centres

 

 

Carried over to 1999

July 1999

2. Review the role of Monash International.

Completed. Outcomes being implemented

3. Develop a set of guidelines for the coordination of the submissions of bids for international and development assistance projects

Carried over to 1999

4. Internationalise the curriculum and student experience through:

  • Developing a plan to expand access to intercultural and language studies
  • Increasing the number of study abroad bursaries
  • All Monash award programs to demonstrate commitment to internationalisation outcomes
  • Developing and extending subjects in which students undertake intensive on-site study in overseas locations
  • 10 per cent of students spending at least one semester abroad during undergraduate award

 

On-going

December 1998

2000

On-going

 

2002

 

Performance in international activities against objectives

Monash has steadily increased the number of international students enrolled between 1996 and 31 March 1998 (from 5795 in 1996 to 7099 in 1998). The University continues to attract international students to a range of levels of study such as postgraduate coursework degrees and undergraduate courses (from 5144 in 1996 to 6381 in 1998). There has also been a large increase in the number of international students studying in the off-shore/distance education modes.

Over 1996-98, there has been a steady increase in the number of Australian students studying a semester overseas (from 178 in 1996 to 193 in 1997 and 238 in 1998).

4. Major goals for enhancing infrastructure and support

Monash seeks to:

  • ensure that its internal environment attracts outstanding students and staff and supports them to realise their full intellectual and professional potential;
  • engage further the professionals, industry and local communities the University serves and to build clear links with schools and vocational education and training providers and employers.

Objectives

Key Performance Indicators

  1. To embrace improved operating methods and organisational structures by 2000
  2. To strive to ensure that all campuses achieve an appropriate range of facilities of the highest quality, and make a distinctive contribution to the diversity, innovation and internationalisation of Monash and its engagement with, and service to, its various communities
  3. To recruit, retain, develop and support the best staff, who are committed to improving the quality of Monash programs and services
  4. To guarantee the University’s financial independence and sustainability
  • Number and percentage of staff – academic and general - by broad classification and gender
  • Level and proportion of annual income by each major income source
  • Safety margin - surplus [deficit]/total revenue
  • Proportion of capital budget devoted to maintenance and refurbishment
  • Level of overall student satisfaction with enrolment and administrative processes from pre-enrolment to post-graduation

The following strategies are intended to achieve these objectives.

Key Strategies

Performance Targets

1. Develop a policy framework within which alliances with universities and other key organisations may be established, implemented and evaluated

1999

2. Continue to develop the University-wide integrated strategic planning and review process:

  • Engage in strategic benchmarking and best quality practices with the Group of Eight
  • Implement recommendations from a benchmarking pilot focussed on student administration
  • Continue to exchange performance data with Australian universities, which share a similar research and research training profile
July 1999

On-going

Ongoing

On-going

3. Improve the quality of the internal environment

1998 targets met

4. Develop strategies for increased community access to sports and recreation facilities

Ongoing

5. Build into the information technology (IT) strategy an information services enhancement plan

1999

6. Improve administrative and support services:

  • Develop University-wide program to support students’ language and learning needs
  • Strengthen activities designed to build student relationships with potential employers
 

March 1999

 

March 1999

7. Review and update professional development opportunities for Monash staff

On-going

8. Ensure offshore infrastructure and support needs are met by integrating offshore campus developments into the budget planning and reporting processes

1999
 

Performance in enhancing infrastructure and support against objectives

Monash continues to ensure that staff numbers are consistent with the University’s strategic plan and promoting the advancement of women within the University. Over the period 1996-98 academic staff have constituted around 47 per cent of all University staff. Of these, 36 per cent are women. In 1998, 19 per cent of the University’s academic staff are at level D and above. Around 10 per cent are women. In 1998, four per cent of the University’s general staff are at level 10 or above. Of these, one third are women - an improvement from 30 per cent in 1997.

Monash continues to increase the diversity of its income sources. In 1996, Monash received 47.4 per cent of total income from government grants, in 1997, 43.9 per cent and it is anticipated that in 1998 only 38.1 per cent of total income will be sourced from government grants. Monash continues to maintain its capital stock. There has been a considerable shift in emphasis of capital expenditure in recent years. In 1996, a quarter of the budget was allocated to maintenance and refurbishment. In 1997, 40.7 per cent was spent in this manner and it is planned to at least maintain this level over 1998.

Monash continues to effectively serve and support its students. In early 1998, a University-wide survey examining satisfaction with the enrolment process showed that approximately three-quarters of respondents found the enrolment services within the faculties to be good or excellent. Ninety per cent found the Student Services’ enrolment process to be either good or excellent. These findings are consistent with performance in other years.

Monash continues to be a community resource, committed to participating in the intellectual life of the wider community and to contributing to public debate. These values are reflected in its community service policy and demonstrated in the activities of its External Relations and Community Services Task Force. Monash initiatives during 1998 include extending the schools’ Transitions Program, the Australian Broadcasting Commission (ABC) joint venture to deliver educational services to the Asia-Pacific region, the strengthening of links with the vocational education and training (VET) sector, the establishment of the Green Inc new technology and business centre at Gippsland, engaging in further co-operative projects with the City of Monash, planning for expansion of performing arts activities, developing strategies to increase alumni involvement and the establishment of its first full off-shore campus, Sunway Malaysia.

Contact

Professor A W Lindsay, Deputy Vice-Chancellor (Academic and Planning)
Tel: (03) 9905 2018,
Fax: (03) 9905 3706
Email: alan.lindsay@adm.monash.edu.au

Back  -   Return to Contents  -  Next