Australian Coat of Arms Dr Brendan Nelson  
Australian Government Minister for Education
Science and Training and Training

Media Centre
   

TRANSCRIPT

Senate Inquiry into Higher Education/TAFE Fees in NSW

Date: Wednesday 25 June 2003

Well, the government has spent much of last year reviewing Australia’s universities and the future of higher education in Australia. We engaged the entire university sector, the business community and the government this year in its budget announced a one point five billion dollar package of reforms for Australian universities.

Now, the Australian Labor Party in the Senate has announced, having deliberately decided not to participate in the review of higher education, the Labor Party has now announced that it’s going to have a Senate inquiry. That inquiry will not report to the parliament, at least until the end of the year, and yet the same Labor Party says it’s announcing its own policies in relation to higher education in a few weeks time.

It’s important that the Labor Party understands that Australians, Australian students, need a resolution of the higher education issue now. The Australian vice-chancellors themselves have come out unanimously and called on the Labor Party to scrap this idea of a Senate inquiry; that we’ve already had a significant, wide … wide … we’ve already had a significant and widespread review of Australian universities and the vice-chancellors themselves are now saying to the Labor Party, for goodness sake support the government’s plan for higher education and get on with it and no more inquiries.

REPORTER:

Surely it’s fair enough but … I mean, the review checked out the higher education system as it was. Surely it’s fair enough for the Senate to look at what your policy … what impact that will have on the system?

NELSON:

Well, of course the Senate examined and is already examining the impact of the government’s higher education program. It does not need, however, to run another inquiry the length and breadth of Australia to frustrate the process of reform and to see that Australian universities have to wait, possibly even years, before any change at all is implemented. They don’t have to have a committee running around Australia reviewing already what’s been reviewed at length in Australian universities. Instead, what they need to do is to take the advice of Australian universities and get on with the process of reform.

REPORTER:

You say the vice-chancellors have welcomed the reforms; the students almost unanimously haven’t. What … how do you explain that?

NELSON:

Well predictably, National Union of Students, the leadership of Australian student unions, of course, they’re not going to support nor do they ever support, anything that is undertaken by the Australian Government. I mean, they’re even not supporting twenty-five thousand scholarships for students. I mean, what needs to be understood here is that this government released seven discussion papers; we ran forty-nine focus groups; we invited eight hundred people, including student unions, into the process of the review. The students were actually participants in the review, over two hundred hours of one to one meetings.

I mean, there is no point in further reviewing something which has been reviewed to death. We know what the problems are facing Australian universities. We’ve developed a comprehensive package for reform and now it behoves the Australian Labor Party to do what is in the interests of Australia, to consider in a constructive way what the government has put forward and which is supported by Australia’s university vice-chancellors.

It does not need to run another inquiry which will run all over Australia, which will effectively mean that for another two to three years there will be no changes to Australian universities. There’s ten and a half billion dollars waiting to be invested in Australian universities and now it seems the Labor Party decides it wants to have another review.

REPORTER:

Do you think they’re … the parents and students are confused with this debate, they’re confused about how much more their children will pay, they’re confused about what you’re arguing? I mean, there’s a lot … there are heaps of numbers being thrown around.

NELSON:

Well, what’s happening is that the Labor Party and the senior representatives of the Labor Party are deliberately seeking to deceive and mislead Australians, and Australian students and their families, in relation to what these reforms are all about. The reforms are quite clear in that what will happen is the government will invest another one and a half billion dollars in the first four years; there will be significantly more money for teaching and nursing; thirty three and a half thousand extra fully funded places in the first five years; additional support for regional universities; a focus on teaching and nursing and in relation to HECS which, of course, you do not pay back until you’ve graduated and you’re working, students will not have to pay a cent back until they’re earning thirty thousand dollars a year. And the universities, for the first time, will themselves set the HECS charge from zero to an upper limit, which will be set by … and has been set by the government.

I mean, it’s fairly clear, we’ve spent an enormous amount of effort and time and we’ve invested taxpayers’ moneys in spending more than a year looking at Australian universities. The last thing we need now is another review.

And on … in relation to the issue of fees, it is rank hypocrisy for the Labor Party on the one hand to be totally opposed to any increase … possible increase in HECS charges for universities which were argued for by the universities themselves, where students don’t pay a cent back until they’re working, with all of the HECS money going to universities and then on the other hand, the Labor Party in New South Wales announces a three hundred per cent increase in TAFE fees; no loans to support them. It was never lobbied for by the TAFE directors and the poorer students in the country end up at TAFE.

I mean, how on earth do you expect students to turn up to TAFE, pay sixteen hundred and fifty dollars a year, when they come from the poorest families in the country. If the Labor Party has any kind of policy consistency, let alone decency at all, it will stand up today and oppose and criticise the changes to TAFE fees, not just in New South Wales, but also Victoria and more recently South Australia.

 

ENDS

 

 

Copyright  |  Disclaimer  |  Privacy Statement