Submissions 121-140

<< Back - Submissions 101-120 | Next - Submissions 141-160 >>

Submission Number

Author

121

Mr Geoff Taylor, TAS
This submission says that a significant long term improvement in the standards of reading is not going to be achieved by any current methods. The submission expresses concern that the literature relating to later introduction of reading instruction and how time affects attainment is misleading because most short-term studies show improvement. What is required are long-term studies. The writer also claims that education departments fail to treat teachers as professionals and he encourages every school to have journals available to teachers that provide research results on reading and more practical considerations.

122

Mrs D Dolbear, WA
This submission says that the study method used and taught by Applied Scholastics has changed the writer’s life for the better, by helping her to understand what her work position entailed and enabling her to handle the public with confidence. The submission claims there is a tremendous need for this method of learning to be available to all school children, TAFE or university students, as well as senior citizens, who are often afraid to use such new technology as ATMs and computers.

123

Mr B Dolbear, WA
This submission claims that the Applied Scholastics study method provided the writer with a learning skill that was physically and mentally applicable across a wide range of technical skills. The writer invites the Inquiry to examine Applied Scholastics and have its learning / teaching skills applied to all schools “making Australia a much smarter country”.

124

Ms Eileen Jones, VIC
This submission claims that whole language methods of teaching reading, mathematics and spelling have failed, and that it is time for more grammar and spelling practice to be restored. The submission claims that set exercises are both good for the mind and body as well as self esteem, and that memorization is essential for developing later skills.

125

Ms Virginia Gard, WA
The submission claims that L Ron Hubbard’s Study Technology helped the writer to become a success in her career, and that the program doesn’t just help the student with a particular subject, as tutors do, but it teaches them to learn and study any subjects on which they choose to embark with full knowledge and application.

126

Name Not Made Public
This submission describes how the writer learned about the Applied Scholastics Study Technology course for parents and then applied the program to her daughter who was having difficulty with reading. The submission says that the child improved her reading skills and is now a literate person with skills higher than her peer group.

127

Ms Marion Whiteside, WA
The writer of this submission has used the Applied Scholastics Study Technology for 30 years and finds it to be a very simple but thorough method of learning and studying. The submission urges the Inquiry to investigate these methods before coming to any decisions regarding the future educational methods in our schools.

128

Ms Leigh Goldsmith, WA
This submission briefly describes how the writer was not a successful student in high school but later discovered and studied the Study Technology of Applied Scholastics. The submission says that the study data is very simple in that it finds the reason the person failed and recovers their ability to study and finds where they went wrong. The Inquiry is urged to take a closer look Study Technology to determine its value.

129

Ms C K Byrnes, NSW
This submission claims that L Ron Hubbard’s Study Technology greatly assisted the writer to pick up what she needed to know, after leaving school at 15 years of age. The submission highly recommends the Study Technology, which the writer has also used to help a web designer grasp unfamiliar software.

130

Mr George Marston, WA
This submission claims that Applied Scholastics Study Technology helped the writer to overcome learning difficulties and low self-esteem which he had as a child. The writer describes the gradual gradient of the program and how this makes learning the technology interesting and self-fulfilling.

131

Mr Rick Robjent, WA
This submission describes how the writer was able to overcome weaknesses in learning chemistry by using L Ron Hubbard’s Study Technology. The submission claims that this technology would solve the literacy problems found within our teaching system.

132

Name Not Made Public
This submission says that the best approach to teach children to read is to use phonics, and graded readers. The submission refers to a 1978 survey of beginning teachers that showed that the majority felt that more time in their teacher training should have been spent on what to teach and how to teach, and less time on theory. The submission recommends a review of teacher training, claiming that present teachers are a generation or more removed from the phonic method of teaching reading. The writer of this submission is 81 years old and was a primary school teacher for 40 years from 1943.

133

Mr Michael Pierce, ACT
This submission presents the writer’s experience teaching reading in three primary schools (predominantly kindergarten) using a variety of methods, including the Spalding method. The writer discusses this method, saying that it is much more effective and consistent with the English language than other approaches he has used.

134

Mr Hugh Coffield, VIC
This submission urges a return to the simple, commonsense approach used at primary school level which the writer recalls from his youth. The submission encourages the use of rote learning, and the removal of calculators from primary schools to encourage children to use their brains. This submission also expresses the writer’s concern about aggressive opposition to the regular examination of students.

135

Confidential

  • Not available

136

Name Not Made Public
This submission says that the Study Technology course offered through Applied Scholastics assisted the writer’s son to overcome difficulties he was experiencing in school and at TAFE.

137

Mr Brian Wicks, VIC
This submission says that the building blocks of phonics, grammar and spelling are the essential bases on which to build children’s literary skills. The submission also makes the point that teachers are no longer willing to teach difficult or uninteresting subjects, and that skills such as memorizing facts and knowledge communication all need to be taught. The writer was a primary school teacher for over 30 years.

138

E Kroll, WA
This submission expresses concern at the low standard of education in this country and encourages the use of the Learning How to Learn course and the specific Study Technique method.

139

Mrs Joan Eisemann, QLD
This submission promotes The Sound Way to Spelling, Writing and Reading, a phonetic approach developed by Craig Henderson, a West Australian school teacher. The writer indicates that she has successfully implemented this video and DVD-format program with TAFE students in the Riverland area of South Australia.

140

Ms Elizabeth Clarke, QLD
This submission is presented on behalf of the Queensland Teachers’ Research Group, a community-based group of teachers and ex-teachers. The submission includes: a history of the teaching of reading in the 20th century; discussion of the need for a period of instruction necessary to train each child to become a code-breaker; and discussion of research supporting the teaching of reading through a planned, sequential phonic approach.

<< Back - Submissions 101-120 | Next - Submissions 141-160 >>

 Return to Top


Any comments or queries should be sent to: wwweditor@dest.gov.au

This page was last updated on Wednesday, 11 June 2008
Department of Education, Science and Training
Copyright © Commonwealth of Australia
DEST Web Site Privacy Statement
Disclaimer