Submissions 181-200
<< Back - Submissions 161-180 |
Next - Submissions 201-220 >>
Submission Number |
Author |
|
181 |
Name Not Made Public
The writer says that the Study Technology by L Ron Hubbard enabled him
to improve his study results and application so that he started to enjoy
learning and wanted to learn more. The submission recommends that the
Inquiry take action in implementing this particular method about student
techniques into our school systems.
|
|
182 |
School of Education, University of New England, NSW
This submission discusses four groups of issues: first, the interconnectedness
of reading and writing development; second, the need for differential teaching,
according to student need, of reading as decoding, comprehending and critical
interpretive response; third, the importance of literacy pedagogy beyond initial
reading instruction, developing students’ effectiveness in reading and writing
using conventional book-based resources as well as new forms of digital
multimedia; and last, the impact of social, contextual issues on the classroom
implementation of literacy pedagogies.
|
|
183 |
Ms Kylie Zani, WA
This writer says that at the age of eight she learned about L Ron Hubbard’s
Study Technology through an Applied Scholastics organisation. This submission
says that these courses were very simple and enjoyable and they allowed the
writer to be able to study any subject independently. The submission requests
that the Inquiry seriously consider implementing the solutions offered by
Applied Scholastics.
|
|
184 |
Ms Khoi Nguyen, WA
This submission says that Study Technology, delivered by Applied Scholastics,
that was the major factor that enabled the author to have great success with her
university-level computer programming studies. The submission asks the Committee
to take into account the benefits being offered by Applied Scholastics.
|
|
185 |
Name Not Made Public
The writer says that she first became aware of the Applied Scholastics
teachings in 1982 and was amazed that something so simple could be so
effective. The submission describes how the writer was able to help her
children with their schoolwork using these methods.
|
|
186 |
Ms Julie Beer, VIC
This submission calls for a closer examination of the perceived causes of
failure in literacy teaching and their attendant solutions, and briefly outlines
some basic approaches the writer has found to yield success. The writer says
that she has found that the explicit linking of the visual to the oral/aural
through narrative and conversation can provide new levels of understanding in
reading for students. Such an approach requires a shift from viewing teaching as
a method to the understanding of teaching as a much richer dialogic approach.
|
|
187 |
Ms Julie DeAngelis, OzChild, VIC
This submission describes OzChild’s Lift Off With Language program, as an
early literacy program targeting phonological awareness. The program is based on
early identification and intervention for students regarding reading
development, before they fall behind. Direct, classroom instruction implemented
by a speech pathologist as the facilitator is the model. Teachers are provided
support and training to meet the literacy needs of their young students and
parents are also involved in the program. The submission says that statistics
clearly demonstrate improvement in students overall average scores and feedback
from parents and teachers has been exceptionally positive.
|
|
188 |
Ms Julia Grmistone, Brain Gym, VIC
The submission draws the Inquiry’s attention to the Educational Kinesiology
program called Brain Gym, which is a movement-based program used to prepare
students for learning. Fundamental to Educational Kinesiology is the idea that
movement is important in learning and the notes that some of the difficulties
children have with literacy and learning go back to their early childhood
development.. The submission refers to an article published in the Brain Gym
Journal (July 2000) that lists research and anecdotal evidence from around the
world. The submission provides a brief summary of four of the articles. The
writer is a member of the International Faculty of Educational Kinesiology.
|
|
189 |
Name Not Made Public
This submission describes the writer’s difficulties while struggling
with literacy at school and claims that the Study Technology, promoted by
Applied Scholastics, has enabled him to learn six different languages, and
to study anything he wants. The submission encourages the Inquiry to further
investigate this particular study technique and consider its implementation
in all schools in the early school years.
|
|
190 |
Name Not Made Public
This submission claims that the Study Technology by L Ron Hubbard has
provided the writer with the tools to understand what he reads, and to be
able to apply the material in practice.
|
|
191 |
Name Not Made Public
This submission says that the Study Technology by L Ron Hubbard has
given the writer a method to completely understand what she read so that she
was able to extend her education by taking up studies at TAFE.
|
|
192 |
Ms Ann Richardson, VIC
The submission say that contemporary methods for teaching reading are effective
for most students, but that those at risk are often not identified early enough,
nor are they taught in the most effective way. This submission expands on these
points under the following headings: children who are at risk; early
identification is vital; predicating success in literacy acquisition; early
experiences play an important role; and, lastly, the importance of quality
programs in childcare centres. The writer has many years experience as a
classroom teacher, Reading Recovery teacher and Special Education teacher.
|
|
193 |
Name Not Made Public
The author of this submission has worked as a writer, book editor,
management consultant and executive. This submission encourages “the long
overdue return to phonics”, and claims there is also great need for a simple
and workable system of study such as the Study Technology by L Ron Hubbard.
The author says that this study technique represents a profound advance in
education and schooling and that it should be reviewed by the Inquiry’s
Committee.
|
|
194 |
Ms Connie de Koning, WA
This submission claims that Study Technology offered by Applied Scholastics has
enriched the lives of the writer and her flatmate in a whole new way. The
submission recommends Study Technology as a way of improving the reading and
writing skills of Australia’s population.
|
|
195 |
Mr Nigel Graham, WA
The writer says that he found study difficult in the past but has been greatly
helped by Study Technology. Mr Graham notes that he is a very hands on
individual and that Study Technology provided the solution he needed to be able
to study for an indefinite time and to apply what he had learnt.
|
|
196 |
Mr Elve Olver, VIC
This submission says that the writer, after 19
years of teaching, was introduced to the Study Technology technique as defined
by Mr L Ron Hubbard and he became very much aware of the wasted years of
frustration from a personal view point of learning and teaching children. The
submission encourages that this particular study method should be available to
all Australians especially at an early age when they start at school.
|
|
197 |
Name Not Made Public
In this submission, the writer says that the Study Technology by L Ron
Hubbard made a huge difference to his willingness to read the humanities,
and to understand contracts and other work necessities. The submission urges
the Inquiry to seriously consider the training and education programs
offered by Applied Scholastics and to incorporate the materials into the
public education system as a matter of urgency.
|
|
198 |
Mrs Carrie Wright, ACT
This submission says that the writer’s two children have been greatly
assisted in English language, spelling, and understanding the subjects they
are studying by literacy courses conducted by Applied Scholastics. The
submission suggests that this method of teaching be made available to all
students, that teachers be made aware of its existence and it be available
to them to apply in their classes.
|
|
199 |
Mr Greg Bradley, NSW
This submission claims that the Study Technology technique by L Ron Hubbard
contains the vital discoveries of the three barriers to study and includes
methods for overcoming these barriers that are easy to apply and have immediate
results. The writer claims that he and his wife and three children have been
assisted greatly by this particular study technique and suggests that the
Inquiry investigate its effectiveness for improving literacy and reading skills.
|
200 |
Mr Jim Noonan, WA
This submission says that the writer has used the Study Technology by L Ron
Hubbard for the past 25 years for himself, and family members and others, to
their benefit. The submission suggests that Study Technology should form
part of our national education system for lifting literacy standards
|
<< Back - Submissions 161-180 |
Next - Submissions 201-220 >>
Return to Top
|
(49.8 KB, 1 Page)
(5.0
KB, 1 Page)