Bibliography

ABS, 2002, Main Features. Schools Australia, 4221.0

Andrews, L., August 1997, The Effect of HECS on Interest in Undertaking Higher Education”, Higher Education Division, Department of Employment, Education, Training and Youth Affairs

Andrews, L., August 1999, Does HECS Deter? Factors affecting university participation by low SES groups, Higher Education Division, Department of Education, Science and Training, Occasional Paper Series 99F

Carnegie, Jane, 1999, Pathways to Partnerships - ANTA/AVCC Report and Draft Policy Guidelines, VETASSESS

Chapman, B., and Ryan, C., April 2003, “The access implication of income contingent charges for higher education”, ANU Centre for Economic Policy Research, Discussion Paper Number 463

Chapman, B., and Ryan, C., August 18, 2003, “Different Questions Posed. So Why this HECS Fuss over Findings?” in Sydney Morning Herald, p.13

Commonwealth of Australia, 1964, Tertiary Education in Australia (Martin Committee), Report of the Committee on the Future of Tertiary Education in Australia, Vol. 1, Australian Government PS, Canberra

Commonwealth of Australia, 1979, Report on Education, Training and Employment (Williams Committee), Report of the Committee of Inquiry into Education and Training, AGPS, Canberra

Commonwealth of Australia, 1987, Higher Education: A Policy Discussion Paper (The Green Paper), AGPS, Canberra

Commonwealth of Australia, 1988, Higher Education: A Policy Statement (The White Paper), AGPS, Canberra

Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs (DETYA), 1990, A Fair Chance for All: Higher Education that’s Within Everyone’s Reach, Canberra, AGPS

Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs (DETYA), 1999, Higher Education Division, Regional Participation in Higher Education and the Distribution of Higher Education Resources across Regions, Occasional Papers Series, Canberra

Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs (DETYA), March 1999, Higher Education Division, Equity in Higher Education, Occasional Paper Series, 99-A

Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs (DETYA), 2001,“The Enabling Program”, a report compiled as the basis for national consultation using data drawn from DETYA statistics and the unpublished EIP report ”The Cost Effectiveness of Enabling and Related Programs in Australian Tertiary Education” by Clarke et al, completed in 2000, Canberra

Devlin, Y., June 28 2002, “Submission to the Higher Education Review addressing ‘Access on an Equitable Basis’”, accessible at

Dobson, Ian, Sharma, Raj, and Ramsay, Eleanor, 1998, Designated Equity Groups in Australian Universities: Performance of Commencing Students 1996 – undergraduate award courses, AVCC

Fopp, R., 2002, “A Preliminary Report of UniSA-PAL: a joint equity initiative between Para West Adult Campus and the University of South Australia.”

Heagney, Margaret, 1995, “Equity and fee courses: choosing between a rock and a hard place”, paper presented at the Second National Conference on Equity and Access in Tertiary Education, Melbourne.

James, R., Wyn, J., Baldwin, G., Hepworth, G., McInnis, C., and Stephanou, A., 1999, Rural and Isolated Students and their Higher Education Choices: A re-examination of student location, socio-economic background, and educational advantage and disadvantage, Canberra, AGPS.

James, R., 2002, Socioeconomic Background and Higher Education Participation: an analysis of school students’ aspirations and expectations, Department of Education, Science and Training (DEST), Higher Education Group, Evaluations and Investigations Program, Canberra

James, R., June 2002, “Submission to Review of Australian Higher Education. Equity of Participation for People from Lower Socio-economic Backgrounds and Rural and Isolated Areas”, Higher Education Review Submission 60, Associate Professor James, Centre for the Study of Higher Education, The University of Melbourne

James, R., Baldwin, K., Coates, H., Krause, K.L., and McInnis, C., 2004, Analysis of Equity Groups in Higher Education 1991-2002, Centre for the Study of Higher Education, the University of Melbourne, Commonwealth of Australia

Jones, Roger G., 2002, Identifying Higher Education Students from Low Socio-Economic Status Backgrounds and Regional and Remote Area, Department of Education, Science and Training (DEST), Higher Education Group, Evaluations and Investigations Program, Canberra

Lawless, A., 1997, “The First Two Years of the Diploma in University Studies”, University of South Australia, Adelaide

Martin, L.M., 1994, Equity and General Performance Indicators in Higher Education: Volume I Equity Indicators, Canberra AGPS

McInnis, Craig, and Hartley, Robyn, 2002, Managing Study and Work, Department of Education, Science and Training (DEST), Higher Education Group, Evaluations and Investigations Program, Canberra

National Board of Employment, Education and Training (NBEET) and the Higher Education Council (HEC), 1996, Equality, Diversity and Excellence: Advancing the National Higher Education Equity Framework, Canberra AGPS

Nelson , Hon. Brendan, Minister for Education, Science and Training, April 2002, Higher Education at the Crossroads: An Overview Paper, Canberra, Commonwealth of Australia

Nelson, Hon. Brendan, Minister for Education, Science and Training, May 2003, Our Universities. Backing Australia’s Future, Canberra

Parker, Ann, 2002, “Diploma in University Studies and UniSA-PAL – context paper”, University of South Australia

Ramsay, E., 1997, “Current Challenges and Future Dilemmas: Equity policy, planning and research intersections, an institutional perspective”, keynote address presented at the Eighth International Conference of the Australasian Association for Institutional Research, Adelaide, November 1997

Ramsay, E., Tranter, D., Sumner, R., and Barrett, S., 1996, Outcomes of a University’s Flexible Admissions Policies, Department of Education, Science and Training (DEST), Higher Education Group, Evaluations and Investigations Program, AGPS, Canberra

Ramsay, E., Tranter, D., Kain, M., and Sumner, R., 1997, Cross-sectoral Linkages: A Case Study, Department of Employment, Education, Training and Youth Affairs (DETYA), Higher Education Division, Evaluations and Investigations Program, AGPS, Canberra

Ramsay, E., Tranter, D., Charlton, S. and Sumner, R., 1998, Higher Education Access and Equity for Low SES School Leavers, Department of Employment, Education, Training and Youth Affairs (DETYA), Higher Education Division, Evaluations and Investigations Program, AGPS, Canberra

Ramsay, E., 1999, “The National Framework for Australian Higher Education Equity: its origins, evolution and current status”, in Higher Education Quarterly, Volume 53, Number 2

School of International Studies, 1998, “1998 Report of the Review of the Diploma in University Studies”, University of South Australia, Adelaide

Te Riele, K., 2003, “Ideas from Second Chance Senior Secondary Education”, paper delivered at the NSW Public Education Equity Conference, 20-21 February, 2003

Te Riele, K., 2002,“Senior Colleges for a ‘Second Chance’ in Australia”, paper presented at the International Sociology Association 15th World Congress, Brisbane, July 7-13, 2002

University of South Australia, 2001, “DETYA Profiles Paper on Enabling Program”, a paper responding to DETYA’s consultation paper prepared by the Planning Unit following consultation with relevant staff, Adelaide

Wache, D., 1998, “Review of the Diploma of University Studies 1995-1998”, Report to the Head of the School of International Studies, University of South Australia, University of South Australia, Adelaide

Western, J., McMillan, J. and Durrington, D., 1998, Differential Access to higher education: the measurement of socio-economic status, rurality and isolation, Canberra: Ausinfo

 Email this page
 Print this page
 
IN THIS SECTION
Collaboration between the Institutions

Introduction

Students’ Levels of Disadvantage – Summary

Data Collection

Relationships between the Pilot Institutions

Qualitative Data

Quantitative Data Collection

A New Pathway for Adult Learners: Evaluation of a School-University Access Pilot

Socio-economic Backgrounds of Students

Conclusions

Reasons for Participating in the Pilot

The Students

Bibliography: UniSA PAL

Recognition as Completion of Secondary Education

Quantitative Data – Educational Outcomes

Executive Summary

Notes

The School-University Access Pilot 2002-2004

Teaching in the Pilot Course

Quantitative Data – Students’ Characteristics

Defining Success

2002 Pilot: The 2002 Agreement

Expansion and Innovation

Appendices

Teaching, Learning, Assessment and Curriculum Matters

Barriers to study

Management and Administration of the Pilot

Retention, Success, Transition to and Success Rates in Higher Education

Students’ Level of Disadvantage

Para West Adult Campus

Diploma in University Studies

Students with a Disability

Age, Marital Status, Number of Dependants and Gender

The South Australian Adult Re-entry Schools

Motivation

Expanded Pilot

Students’ Motivation

Relevance of the Research

Students from Non English Speaking Backgrounds

2002 Pilot: Implementation of the 2002 Agreement

Scalability of the Pilot

The Full Report: New Pathway for Adult Learners

Retention Rates

National Policy Context

Transition Rates to University Study

Professional Engagement, Development and Satisfaction

Research Questions

Recommendations

Indigenous Students

Relationship between UniSA-PAL and the Diploma in University Studies

2004 and Beyond

Scalability

Expectations and Experience of the Course

Implementation of the 2003 Expanded Pilot

Research Methodology

Qualitative Data Collection

The 2003 Agreement

Rural and Isolated Students

Success Rates

The University of South Australia

The Pilot Institutions