You are here: Home > Higher education > Policy, issues & reviews > Reviews > A New Pathway for Adult Learners > Qualitative Data Collection

Qualitative Data Collection

Qualitative data from the students was collected by means of a student questionnaire, administered and collected by the schools towards the end of the first semester in each of the two years of the pilot. Participation was voluntary and care was taken to ensure that the students understood this, and the purposes of the research, and were confident that their decision whether or not to participate would have no implications either for their progress in the course or their entry into the University’s programs in the following year. This was achieved by means of an information sheet80 distributed to the students before the questionnaire was administered to them, a permission form81 which they signed before completing their questionnaires, and by all of this being handled by school counsellors rather than the teachers involved with the course. Additional qualitative data was obtained from an internal evaluation of the first year of the pilot conducted by the University, which used the data obtained from the student questionnaire referred to above and also another sent to the 2002 students after the study year at Para West was over and they had left the school.

Qualitative data with respect to the experiences of the teaching staff in the school and the academics in the University82 were obtained through semi-structured interviews conducted and taped by the researcher and analysed, following transcription, for congruence, differences and insights into the research questions. Permission forms were completed and signed as a part of this process by all interviewees. In addition, the researcher attended and conducted a series of joint meetings with participating school and university staff at different stages of the two-year pilot. This included presenting preliminary findings to one of these joint meetings, at which feedback and analysis was invited which clarified and further elucidated qualitative findings. Another planned method for recording the teachers’ experiences of the pilot83 was abandoned in the first year of the pilot due to the demands it placed on the teachers’ time. Finally regular email contact was established and maintained with the coordinators of the pilot in the schools and within the University throughout both years of the pilot. Within the schools, regular team meetings were held between all of the teachers involved in the pilot and the local coordinators, and significant issues arising in these meetings were conveyed to the researcher through her contact with the coordinators.

 Email this page
 Print this page
 
IN THIS SECTION
Collaboration between the Institutions

Introduction

Students’ Levels of Disadvantage – Summary

Data Collection

Relationships between the Pilot Institutions

Qualitative Data

Quantitative Data Collection

A New Pathway for Adult Learners: Evaluation of a School-University Access Pilot

Socio-economic Backgrounds of Students

Conclusions

Reasons for Participating in the Pilot

The Students

Bibliography: UniSA PAL

Recognition as Completion of Secondary Education

Quantitative Data – Educational Outcomes

Executive Summary

Notes

The School-University Access Pilot 2002-2004

Teaching in the Pilot Course

Quantitative Data – Students’ Characteristics

Defining Success

2002 Pilot: The 2002 Agreement

Expansion and Innovation

Appendices

Teaching, Learning, Assessment and Curriculum Matters

Barriers to study

Management and Administration of the Pilot

Retention, Success, Transition to and Success Rates in Higher Education

Students’ Level of Disadvantage

Para West Adult Campus

Diploma in University Studies

Students with a Disability

Age, Marital Status, Number of Dependants and Gender

The South Australian Adult Re-entry Schools

Motivation

Expanded Pilot

Students’ Motivation

Relevance of the Research

Students from Non English Speaking Backgrounds

2002 Pilot: Implementation of the 2002 Agreement

Scalability of the Pilot

The Full Report: New Pathway for Adult Learners

Retention Rates

National Policy Context

Transition Rates to University Study

Professional Engagement, Development and Satisfaction

Research Questions

Recommendations

Indigenous Students

Relationship between UniSA-PAL and the Diploma in University Studies

2004 and Beyond

Scalability

Expectations and Experience of the Course

Implementation of the 2003 Expanded Pilot

Research Methodology

Qualitative Data Collection

The 2003 Agreement

Rural and Isolated Students

Success Rates

The University of South Australia

The Pilot Institutions