You are here: Home > Higher education > Policy, issues & reviews > Reviews > A New Pathway for Adult Learners > Transition Rates to University Study

Transition Rates to University Study

Every one of the 2002 UniSA-PAL students who completed the course at Para West Adult Campus applied for entry to university programs, was offered at least one place, and all but two subsequently enrolled in a university undergraduate bachelor degree program. Quantitatively this means that 50 per cent of the 2002 actual commencing UniSA-PAL students were offered a university place with 41 per cent actually enrolling. All but one of the 36 2003 UniSA-PAL students was offered and subsequently enrolled in a university program in 2004. As an additional four non-completers were similarly offered and took up a place at the University of South Australia, on the basis of their results in the Special Tertiary Admissions Test (STAT), the actual commencing cohort of the 2003 UniSA-PAL course offered in the four adult re-entry schools had a transition rate to higher education studies of 57 per cent, almost identical to the average transition rate for the Diploma in University Studies students and almost double the only national data available on transition rates for students in the Enabling Program.

Until the significant structural changes in 2004, the transition rate into undergraduate bachelor degree level studies for students in the Diploma in University Studies was the rate at which they progressed from stage one to stage two of the Diploma, since at stage two they entered the first year of an undergraduate bachelor degree of their choosing. The Diploma in University Studies program was originally designed on the assumption that most of its students would study part-time and at a distance. While there have been a growing number of students enrolling full-time over recent years, many of these subsequently drop their fraction and take a longer time to complete stage one than originally intended. These complex patterns of engagement with the program are a result of the students’ complex lives and the many other responsibilities, expectations and time pressures impacting on their studies. One effect of this is that it is very difficult to obtain an overall snapshot of the progress of these students at any one point in time, or to make generalisations about their progression and transition rates in any particular year.

Between 1996 and 2002 the average transition rate for Diploma in University Studies students was 58 per cent, comparable to the transition rates for the second year of UniSA-PAL. As with their success rates, the transition rates into bachelor degree level study for the Diploma in University Studies students have varied across the years from a high of nearly 70 per cent in 1996 to a low of 39.5 per cent in 2001. The transition rates into university level study of students undertaking bridging programs across the country have, like their success rates, been the subject of recent policy and program concern at the national level. As cited in the 2001 DEST paper “The Enabling Program”, the investigation by Clarke et al showed that only 30 per cent of the students who commenced bridging programs in 1996 transferred to award courses between 1997 and 1999, noting that this is of particular concern given that the program was specifically established to provide an effective pathway into this level of study. Based on this data, the transition rates of both the 2003 UniSA-PAL students and average rates for Diploma in University Studies students are nearly twice as good as those for students in federally funded bridging programs, a significant outcome since their level of educational disadvantage is at least comparable and almost certainly greater than their peers in the bridging programs.

 Email this page
 Print this page
 
IN THIS SECTION
Collaboration between the Institutions

Introduction

Students’ Levels of Disadvantage – Summary

Data Collection

Relationships between the Pilot Institutions

Qualitative Data

Quantitative Data Collection

A New Pathway for Adult Learners: Evaluation of a School-University Access Pilot

Socio-economic Backgrounds of Students

Conclusions

Reasons for Participating in the Pilot

The Students

Bibliography: UniSA PAL

Recognition as Completion of Secondary Education

Quantitative Data – Educational Outcomes

Executive Summary

Notes

The School-University Access Pilot 2002-2004

Teaching in the Pilot Course

Quantitative Data – Students’ Characteristics

Defining Success

2002 Pilot: The 2002 Agreement

Expansion and Innovation

Appendices

Teaching, Learning, Assessment and Curriculum Matters

Barriers to study

Management and Administration of the Pilot

Retention, Success, Transition to and Success Rates in Higher Education

Students’ Level of Disadvantage

Para West Adult Campus

Diploma in University Studies

Students with a Disability

Age, Marital Status, Number of Dependants and Gender

The South Australian Adult Re-entry Schools

Motivation

Expanded Pilot

Students’ Motivation

Relevance of the Research

Students from Non English Speaking Backgrounds

2002 Pilot: Implementation of the 2002 Agreement

Scalability of the Pilot

The Full Report: New Pathway for Adult Learners

Retention Rates

National Policy Context

Transition Rates to University Study

Professional Engagement, Development and Satisfaction

Research Questions

Recommendations

Indigenous Students

Relationship between UniSA-PAL and the Diploma in University Studies

2004 and Beyond

Scalability

Expectations and Experience of the Course

Implementation of the 2003 Expanded Pilot

Research Methodology

Qualitative Data Collection

The 2003 Agreement

Rural and Isolated Students

Success Rates

The University of South Australia

The Pilot Institutions