You are here: Home > Higher education > Publications & resources > other_publications > School-Leavers with Non-Conventional Secondary Schooling

Tertiary Admission for School-Leavers with Non-Conventional Secondary Schooling

Avril McClelland, John Topley
Brisbane, March 2002

© Commonwealth of Australia 2002

ISBN 0 642 77375 0 (online version)

This work is copyright. It may be reproduced in whole or in part for study or training purposes subject to the inclusion of an acknowledgment of the source and no commercial usage or sale. Reproduction for purposes other than those indicated above, requires the prior written permission from the Commonwealth available from the Department of Communications, Information Technology and the Arts. Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to Commonwealth Copyright Administration, GPO Box 2154, Canberra ACT 2601 or e-mail commonwealth.copyright@dcita.gov.au.

This is the report of a project commissioned by the Department of Education, Science and Training and conducted by the Queensland Tertiary Admissions Centre Ltd in the Queensland setting. The project looked into the need to assess, for tertiary entrance purposes, the apparently increasingly varied profile of qualifications and experiences of young people by creating and piloting for school-leavers and other young people a comprehensive assessment method based on alternative evidence used in conjunction with or in lieu of the Tertiary Entrance Rank (TER).

An overview of the report and its recommendations is contained in Chapter One of the report. The key findings of the report are that:

  • the admission of applicants to tertiary study, based on many routes and methods, should be recognised as the norm;

  • there should not be barriers to young people being able to present alternative evidence to the TER as a basis for admission to tertiary study;

  • the development of an alternative method to assess tertiary entrance for non-conventional school leavers is not required, as universities are already using a range of types of evidence to determine proficiency for tertiary study; and

  • resources should instead be directed to helping students decide their educational and career directions.

Full Report  PDF Document  (1.26 MB) (If you are having trouble downloading the full report please use the split PDF files)

Split-PDF Report