| |
RECOMMENDATION |
GOVERNMENT’S RESPONSE |
| 1 |
That the Knowledge and Innovation principles of excellence; institutional autonomy and responsiveness; student choice; linkage and collaboration; and transparency, contestability and accountability be retained. |
The Government will retain the Knowledge and Innovation principles. |
| 2 |
That the Government examine ways to build further linkages and collaboration within the national innovation system, including the private sector, taking note of the findings of this evaluation and the Review of Closer Collaboration between Universities and Publicly Funded Research Agencies. |
The Backing Australia’s Ability – Building our Future through Science and Innovation package includes a number of initiatives that will build linkages and foster collaboration.
The Government is providing $542 million over 2004-05 to 2010-11 for a National Collaborative Research Infrastructure Strategy to continue to provide researchers with access to major infrastructure, link infrastructure funding more directly to Australia’s National Research Priorities and to foster greater research collaboration and the collaborative use of infrastructure.
The Government is also providing an additional $305 million over the next seven years to the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation to enable the development of large-scale collaborative research partnerships which reflect the National Research Priorities.
The Government is strengthening the commercial focus on the Cooperative Research Centres (CRC) Programme and through Backing Australia’s Ability – Building our Future through Science and Innovation will provide a total of $127.5 million for the Programme including an additional $65 million available from 2005-06.
The Government accepts that strengthening the coordination of the research effort will benefit its investment in research and will pursue this through existing fora including the Prime Minister’s Science, Engineering and Innovation Council. |
| 3 |
That performance-based higher education research funding be retained. |
The Government will retain performance-based higher education research funding. |
| 4 |
That the Government provide increased funding to allow universities to carry out their responsibilities to renew and enhance their institutional research infrastructure, to develop their own strategic research focus and to properly carry out competitively awarded research projects. |
The Government is providing substantial funding for research infrastructure including $542 million over 2004-05 to 2010-11 for a National Collaborative Research Infrastructure Strategy. The Strategy will continue to provide researchers with access to major infrastructure including communications infrastructure. The Strategy will link infrastructure funding more directly to Australia’s National Research Priorities and foster greater research collaboration and the collaborative use of infrastructure.
The Government recognises that inflexible leveraging arrangements – such as those in the former Major National Research Facilities Programme - may inhibit universities’ capacity to develop new research strengths and respond to regional research priorities. Where appropriate, for example in the new National Collaborative Research Infrastructure Strategy, the Government will in future avoid inflexible leveraging requirements.
The Government is also providing an additional $554.5 million between 2006-07 and 2010-2011 to maintain Research Infrastructure Block Grants (RIBG) support at 20 cents for each dollar of Australian competitive research grant income.
|
| 5 |
That the balance between performance-based block and competitive funding be retained. |
The Government is maintaining the current balance between competitive and performance-driven block funding of research in Australia’s universities. |
| 6 |
That the Government and the higher education sector acknowledge the importance of enhancing the quality of research outputs, and engage in a further discussion on how best to undertake cost-effective research quality assessment. |
Over the next two years the Government will establish Research Quality and Accessibility Frameworks for Publicly Funded Research. The Framework will be developed in consultation with universities and publicly funded research agencies. |
| 7 |
That, if developed, such an assessment mechanism be used as a tool for distributing additional research support funding which may be provided in accordance with Recommendation 4. |
The Government has made no decision to apply the Research Quality and Accessibility Frameworks to allocation of research funding. |
| 8 |
That no changes be made to the operation of the Research Infrastructure Block Grants Scheme (RIBG). |
The Government is retaining the current operational arrangements for the RIBG Scheme. |
| 9 |
That the Government should provide increased funds to the Australian Research Council (ARC), the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) and other granting bodies to allow them to provide increased funding to cover overheads associated with research projects, subject to agreement among relevant portfolios. |
The Government is providing an additional $554.5 million between 2006-07 and 2010-2011 to maintain RIBG support at 20 cents for each dollar of Australian competitive research grant income.
The Government recognises that inflexible leveraging arrangements – such as those in the former Major National Research Facilities Programme - may inhibit universities’ capacity to develop new research strengths and respond to regional research priorities. Where appropriate, for example in the new National Collaborative Research Infrastructure Strategy, the Government will in future avoid inflexible leveraging requirements.
In respect of the NHMRC, the Government is providing $200 million over the next seven years for overhead infrastructure costs for independent medical research institutes. |
| 10 |
That the Government simplify the administration of the Research Training Scheme (RTS), including examination of the scope for removing the separations element. The RTS should have incentives for timely completion. |
The Government will consult with stakeholders regarding the simplification of the RTS with a view to finalising arrangements for the 2005 allocations.
The Government will also consider whether to retain the capping arrangements that apply to the RTS and IGS in consultation with stakeholders. |
| 11 |
That the Institutional Grants Scheme (IGS) be retained, without any changes to the current formulae. |
The Government is retaining the IGS without any changes to the current formulae.
The Government is, however, considering whether to retain the capping arrangements that apply to the RTS and IGS. The Government will consult with stakeholders regarding this over the next two months. |
| 12 |
That equal weighting of all research income in funding formulae be retained. |
The Government is retaining equal weighting of all research income in funding formulae. |
| 13 |
That publications be retained as an element in funding formulae. |
The Government is retaining publications as an element in funding formulae. |
| 14 |
That the Government remove capping from the RTS and IGS formulae. |
Stakeholder input to the Evaluation of Knowledge and Innovation reforms was sharply divided regarding whether capping for the RTS and IGS formulae should be retained.
The Government will consider this further in consultation with stakeholders with a view to finalising arrangements for the 2005 allocations. |
| 15 |
That the Government should continue to require institutions to show evidence of strategic planning of research, but revise reporting requirements so that Research and Research Training Management Reports (RRTMRs) are required less frequently (perhaps on a triennium basis) and further consolidated into broader reporting and feedback requirements. RRTMRs could ultimately be subsumed by mechanisms for assessing research quality. |
Over the next two years the Government will develop Research Quality and Accessibility Frameworks for Publicly Funded Research. The framework will be developed in consultation with universities and publicly funded research agencies.
The Government will continue to require that universities provide RRTMRs pending the development of the Research Quality Framework. |
| 16 |
That the Government consider continuing some form of protection for regional universities, while also increasing incentives for all universities to identify and build on particular areas of research strength. |
The Government is providing $12.4 million over the next four years to extend Regional Protection Funding to help regional universities to maintain and build their capacity to carry out research which is of benefit to regional Australia. |
| 17 |
That the arrangements for contestability of funding for the Institute of Advanced Studies of the Australian National University (ANU) be continued. |
The Government will retain existing arrangements for contestability of funding for the Institute of Advanced Studies of the ANU. |
| 18 |
That the Government and the higher education sector ensure that any quality assessment mechanism which is developed accurately evaluates research quality in all discipline areas, particularly the humanities and social sciences. |
Over the next two years the Government will develop Research Quality and Accessibility Frameworks for Publicly Funded Research. The framework will be developed in consultation with universities and publicly funded research agencies and will apply across all discipline areas including the humanities and social sciences. |