Ainley J. (1977). The impact of science facilities on learning science. Research in Science Education, 7, 213-222.
Ainley, J. (1995). Students’ views of their schools. Unicorn, 21(3), 5-16.
Allard, A., Cooper, M., Hildebrand, G., & Wealands, E. (1995). STAGES–Steps towards addressing gender in educational settings. Carlton, Victoria: Curriculum Corporation.
American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1989). Science for all Americans: Benchmarks for scientific literacy. http://www.aaas.org/project2061/
American Institutes for Research. (1999). Designing effective professional development: Lessons from the Eisenhower Program. Washington, DC: US Department of Education, Office of the Under Scretary, Planning and Evaluation Service.
Anderson, J. O., & Bachor, D. G. (1993, April). Assessment practices in the elementary classroom: Perspectives of stakeholders. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, Atlanta, GA.
Anderson, R. D., & Michener, C. P. (1994). Research in science teacher education. In D. L. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 3-44). New York: Macmillan.
Appleton, K. (1992). Discipline knowledge and confidence to teach science: Self-perceptions of primary teacher education students. Research in Science Education, 22, 11-19.
Appleton, K., & Symington, D. (1996). Changes in primary science over the past decade: Implications for the research community. Research in Science Education, 26, 299-316.
Australian Academy of Science. (1994). Primary investigations. Canberra: Author.
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (1999). Schools, Australia, preliminary: ABS catalogue number 4220.0. Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics.
Australian Council of Deans of Education. (2000). Submission to the Teaching and Learning of Science Project. Canberra: Author.
Australian Education Council. (1993). National Action Plan for the Education of Girls 1993-1997. Carlton, Victoria: Curriculum Corporation.
Australian Science Teachers Association (ASTA). (1985). Science in Australian schools: Today’s problems and tomorrow’s challenges. Canberra: Author.
Australian Science Teachers Association (ASTA). (1987). Policy on girls and women in science. Canberra: Author.
Australian Science, Technology and Engineering Council (ASTEC). (1997). Foundations for Australia’s future: Science and technology in primary schools. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.
[Return to Top]
B
Baird, J. R. (1994). A framework for improving educational practice: Individual challenge; shared adventure. In J. Edwards (Ed.), Thinking: International interdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 137-146). Melbourne, Victoria: Hawker Brownlow Education.
Baird, J. R., & Northfield, J. R. (1995). Learning from the Peel experience. Melbourne: Monash University Press.
Baird, J. R., & Penna, C. (1992). Survey research. In J. R. Baird (Ed.), Shared adventure: A view of quality teaching and learning (Second report of the Teaching and Learning Science in Schools Project) (pp. 185-274). Melbourne: Monash University.
Baird, J. R., Gunstone, R. F., Penna, C., Fensham, P. J., & White, R. T. (1990). Researching balance between cognition and affect in science teaching and learning. Research in Science Education, 20, 11-20.
Beaton, A. E., Martin, M. O., Mullis, I. V. S., Gonzalez, E. J., Smith, T. A., & Kelly, D. L. (1996). Science achievement in the middle school years: IEA’s Third International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS). Chestnut Hill, MA: International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement.
Bell, B. & Cowie, B. (1997). Formative assessment and science education. Research report, Learning in Science Project (Assessment). Hamilton, New Zealand: University of Waikato, Centre for Science, Mathematics and Technology Education Research.
Bell, B., Jones, A., & Carr, M. (1995). The development of the recent National New Zealand Science Curriculum. Studies in Science Education, 26, 73-105.
Bessant, B., & Holbrook, A. (1995). Reflections on educational research in Australia (pp. 266-267). Coldstream, Victoria: Australian Association for Research.
Biggs, J. B., & Moore, P. J. (1993). The process of learning (3rd ed.). New York: Prentice Hall.
Black, P. (1993). Formative and summative assessment by teachers. Studies in Science Education, 21, 49-97.
Black, P. (1995a). Can teachers use assessment to improve learning? British Journal of Curriculum and Assessment, 5(2), 7-11.
Black, P. (1995b). 1987 to 1995—The struggle to formulate a national curriculum for science for England and Wales. Studies in Science Education, 26, 159‑188.
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education, 5(1), 7-74.
Boud, D., Dynan, M. B., Parker, L. H., & Ryan, A. S. (1979). A discussion of issues arising from the Physical Science Evaluation Project. Australian Science Teachers Journal, 2 (2), 67-80.
Bybee, R. W. (1997). Achieving scientific literacy: From purposes to practical action. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Bybee, R. W., & DeBoer, G. (1994). Research on the goals for science education. In D. L. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching and learning of science (pp. 357-387). New York: Macmillan.
[Return to Top]
C
Collins, A. (1995). National Science Education Standards in the United States: A process and a product. Studies in Science Education, 26, 7-37.
Conference of Education System’s Chief Executive Officers. (1998). The National Teacher Supply and Demand Working Party. http://www.curriculum.edu.au/mceetya/publicat/pub342.htm
Cosgrove, M., & Osborne, R. (1985). Learning frameworks for changing children’s ideas. In R. Osborne & P. Freyberg (Eds.), Learning in science (pp.101–111). Auckland, NZ: Heinemann.
Council for Science and Technology. (2000). Science teachers: A report on supporting and developing the profession of science teaching in primary and secondary schools. London: Author.
Cross, R. (1997). ‘Back to the future’: The sixties come to school—Science in Victorian schools. Melbourne Studies in Education, 38(2), 101-113.
Curriculum Corporation. (1994a). A statement on science for Australian schools. Melbourne: Author.
Curriculum Corporation. (1994b). Science—A curriculum profile for Australian schools. Melbourne: Author.
Curriculum Council. (1998). Curriculum Framework for Kindergarten to Year 12 in Western Australia. Perth, Western Australia: Author.
Cuttance, P. & Stokes, S. A. (2000). Reporting on student and school achievement: A research report prepared for the Commonwealth Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs. Canberra: DETYA.
[Return to Top]
D
Darling-Hammond, L. (1997). Doing what matters most: Investing in quality teaching. New York: National Commission on Teaching and America’s Future.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Teaching quality and student achievement: A review of State Policy evidence. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(1). (http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v8nl)
DeBoer, G.E. (2000). Scientific literacy: Another look at its historical and contemporary meanings and its relationship to science education reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 582-601.
Dekkers, J., & De Laeter, J. (in press). Enrolment trends in school science education in Australia. International Journal of Science Education.
Dekkers, J., & De Laeter, J. R. (1997). The changing nature of upper secondary school science subject enrolments. Australian Science Teachers Journal, 43(4), 35-41.
Dillon, J., Osborne, J., Fairbrother, R., & Kurina, L. (2000). A study into the professional views and needs of science teachers in primary and secondary schools in England. London: Council for Science and Technology.
Dircks, R. (1985). The place of science in the K–12 curriculum of Australian schools. Canberra: Australian Science Teachers Association.
Dobson, I. R., & Calderon, A. J. (1999). Trends in science education: Learning, teaching and outcomes 1989–1997. Melbourne: Australian Council of Deans of Science.
Driver, R. (1996). What is the use of theory in science teaching? In Quality in science teaching (The ASE INSET Services Annual Conference, pp. 69-75). London: ASE INSET Services.
Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (1994). Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom.Educational Researcher, 23(7), 5-12.
Driver, R., & Oldham, V. (1986). A constructivist approach to curriculum development in science. Studies in Science Education, 13, 105-122.
[Return to Top]
D
Education Department of Western Australia. (1994). Profiles of student achievement: Science in Western Australian government schools. Perth: Education Department of Western Australia.
Education Department of Western Australia. (1998). Outcomes and standards framework: Science student outcome statements. Perth: Education Department of Western Australia.
Education Queensland. (2000). Framework project. http://www.qed.qld.gov.au/news/framework/
Eyers, V. (1992). The education of young adolescents in South Australian schools. Report of the junior secondary review. Adelaide: Education Department of South Australia.
[Return to Top]
F
Fairbrother, R., & Hackling, M. (1997). Is this the right answer? International Journal of Science Education, 19(8), 887-894.
Fensham, P. J. (1983). A research base for new objectives of science teaching. Science Education, 67, 3-12.
Fensham, P. J. (1985). Science for all: A reflective essay. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 17, 415-435.
Fensham, P. J. (1987). Physical science, society and technology: A case study in the sociology of education. In K. Riquarts (Ed.), Science and technology education and the quality of life (Vol. 2, pp. 714-723). Kiel: University of Kiel, Institute for Science Education.
Fensham, P. J. (Ed.). (1988). Developments and dilemmas in science education. London: Falmer Press.
Fensham, P. J. (1992). Science and technology. In P. W. Jackson (Ed.), Handbook of research on curriculum (pp. 789-829). New York: Macmillan.
Fensham, P. J. (1995). One step forward... Australian Science Teachers Journal, 41(4), 24-29.
Fensham, P. J. (Ed.). (1996). Science and technology education in the post-compulsory years. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.
Fensham, P. J. (1997). School science and its problems with scientific literacy. In R. Levinson & J. Thomas (Eds.), Science today: Problem or crisis? London: Routledge.
Fensham, P. J. (1998). Primary science and technology in Australia: A discussion paper and comparative perspective (Key Centre Monograph No 7). Perth: Curtin University of Technology, Key Centre for School Science and Mathematics.
Fensham, P. J. (1999). Science content as problematic: Issues for research. The Rosalind Driver Memorial Lecture presented at the first meeting of the European Science Education Research Association, Kiel, Germany.
Fensham, P. J., Gunstone, R. F., & White, R. T. (Eds.). (1994). The content of science: A constructivist approach to its teaching and learning. London: Falmer Press.
Fuller, M.G., & Steinberger, S. (1991). The new meaning of educational change. New York: Teachers College Press.
[Return to Top]
G
Gardner, H. (1992). Intelligence reframed: Multiple intelligences for the 21st century. New York: Basic Books.
Gender Equity Task Force for the Ministerial Council on Education, Employment, Training and Youth Affairs. (1997). Gender equity: A framework for Australian schools. Canberra, ACT: Australian Capital Territory Department of Education and Training and Children’s Youth and Family Bureau, PO Box 1584, Tuggeranong, ACT 2901.
Gianello, L. (1988). Getting into gear—Gender-inclusive teaching strategies. Canberra, ACT: Curriculum Development Centre.
Gibbs, W. W., & Fox, D. (1999, October). The false crisis in science education. Scientific American, 87-92.
Goodrum, D., Cousins, J., & Kinnear, A. (1992). The reluctant primary school teacher. Research in Science Education, 22, 163-169.
Gott, R., & Duggan, S. (1996). Practical work: Its role in the understanding of evidence in science. International Journal of Science Education, 18(7),
791-806.
Gunstone, R. F. (1995). Constructivist learning and the teaching of science. In B. Hand & V. Prain (Eds.), Teaching and learning in science: The constructivist classroom (pp. 3-20). Sydney: Harcourt Brace.
[Return to Top]
H
Hackling, M. W., & Garnett, P. J. (1995). Development of expertise in science investigation skills. Australian Science Teachers Journal, 41(4), 80-86.
Hackling, M. W. (1998). Working scientifically: Implementing and assessing open investigation work in science. Perth: Education Department of Western Australia.
Harmon, M., Smith, T. A., Martin, M. O., Kelly, D. L., Beaton, A. E., Mullis, I. V. S., Gonzales, E. J., & Orpwood, G. (1997). Performance assessment in IEA’s third international mathematics and science study (TIMSS). Chestnut Hill, MA: International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement.
Hennessy, S. (1993). Situated cognition and cognitive apprenticeship: Implications for classroom learning. Studies in Science Education, 22, 1-41.
Hewson, P. W., & Thorley, N. (1989). The conditions of conceptual change in the classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 11, 541-553.
Hildebrand, G. (1989). Creating a gender-inclusive science education. The Australian Science Teachers Journal, 35(3), 7-16.
Hodson, D. (1992). Assessment of practical work: Some considerations in philosophy of science. Science and Education, 1, 115-144.
Hough, M. (Ed.). (1979). Around the States. Australian Science Teachers Journal, 25(1), 81-92.
Hurd, P. deH. (1970). Scientific enlightenment for an age of science. The Science Teacher, 37(1), 13-15.
Hurd, P. deH. (1984). Science education: The search for a new vision. Educational Leadership, 41(4), 20-22.
Hurd, P. deH. (1990). Guest editorial: Change and challenge in science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27, 413-414.
[Return to Top]
I J
Ingvarson, L., & Wright, J. (1999). Science teachers are developing their own standards. Australian Science Teachers Journal, 45(4), 27-34.
Jenkins, E. W. (1992). School science education: Towards a reconstruction. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 24, 229-246.
Jones, A., & Moreland, J. (1998, July). Assessment in technology education: Developing an initial framework for research. Paper presented at the Australasian Science Education Research Association conference, Darwin.
[Return to Top]
K
Kahle, J.B., & Boone, W. (2000). Strategies to improve student science learning: Implications for science teacher education. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 11, 93-107.
Kahle, J. B., & Meece, J. (1994). Research on gender issues in the classroom. In D. L. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 542-557). New York: Macmillan.
Kennedy, K.J. (2000). Standards for the Teaching Profession: Here we go again!, Unicorn, 26(1), 1-3.
Kenway, J., & Willis, S. (with Blackmore, J., & Rennie, L.). (1998). Answering back: Girls, boys and feminism in schools. New York: Routledge.
Kuhn, D. (1989). Children and adults as intuitive scientists. Psychological Review, 96(4), 674-689.
Kyle, W. C. (1995a). Editorial: Scientific literacy: How many lost generations can we afford? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 895-896.
Kyle, W. C. (1995b). Editorial: Scientific literacy: Where do we go from here? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 1007-1009.
[Return to Top]
L
Layton, D., Jenkins, E., & Donnelly, J. (1994). Scientific and technological literacy: Meanings and rationales. Leeds, UK: University of Leeds, Center for Studies in Science and Mathematics Education, in association with UNESCO.
Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.
Lewis, S., & Davies, A. (1988). GAMAST professional development manual: Gender equity in mathematics and science. Canberra, Australia: Curriculum Development Centre.
Lokan, J., Ford, P., & Greenwood, L. (1996). Maths and science on the line: Australian junior secondary students’ performance. Third International Mathematics and Science Study. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.
Lokan, J., Ford, P., & Greenwood, L. (1997). Maths and science on the line: Australian middle primary students’ performance. Third International Mathematics and Science Study. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.
Loucks-Horsley, S., Hewson, P. W., Love, N., & Stiles, K. E. (1998). Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics. San Francisco: Corwin Press Inc.
Louden, W. (2000). Standards for standards: The development of Australian professional standards for teaching. Australian Journal of Education, 44(2), 118-134.
[Return to Top]
M
Martin, L. H. (1964). Tertiary education in Australia: Report of the Committee on the Future of Tertiary Education in Australia to the Australian Universities Commission. Melbourne: Government Printers.
Martin, M. O., Mullis, I. V. S., Beaton, A. E., Gonzalez, E. J., Smith, T. A., & Kelly, D. L. (1997). Science achievement in the primary school years: IEA’s Third International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS). Chestnut Hill, MA: International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement.
MCEETYA. (1999). Australia’s common and agreed National Goals for Schooling in the twenty-first century. Curriculum Perspectives, 19(4), 8-9.
Millar, R. (1996). Towards a science curriculum for public understanding. School Science Review, 77(280), 7-18.
Millar, R., & Osborne, J. (1998). Beyond 2000: Science education for the future (The report of a seminar series funded by the Nuffield Foundation). London: King’s College London, School of Education.
Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Beaton, A. E., Gonzalez, E. J., Kelly, D. L., & Smith, T. A. (1998). Mathematics and science achievement in the final year of secondary school: IEA’s Third International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS). Chestnut Hill, MA: International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement.
Murphy, P. F., & Gipps, C. V. (Eds.). (1996). Equity in the classroom: Towards effective pedagogy for girls and boys. London: Falmer Press and UNESCO Publishing.
[Return to Top]
N
National Board of Employment, Education and Training. (1992). The middle years of schooling (Years 6–10): A discussion paper. Canberra: Australian Government Printing Service.
National Board of Employment, Education and Training. (1993a). Five to fifteen: Reviewing the ‘compulsory’ years of schooling. Canberra: Australian Government Printing Service.
National Board of Employment, Education and Training. (1993b). In the middle: Schooling for young adolescents. Canberra: Australian Government Printing Service.
National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk. Washington, DC: Department of Education.
National Science Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
NSW Board of Studies. (1998). Science stages 4–5: Syllabus. Sydney: Board of Studies NSW.
NSW Department of School Education. (1995). QA 20/20 report. What parents want from further participation and communication. Sydney: New South Wales Department of School Education.
NSW Ministerial Advisory Council on the Quality of Teaching. (1999). Identifying the challenges: Initial and continuing teacher education for the 21st century. Sydney, Australia: Author.
[Return to Top]
O
OECD Programme for International Student Assessment. (1999). Measuring student knowledge and skills: A new framework for assessment. Paris: OECD.
Office of Educational Research and Improvement. (1992). Parental satisfaction with schools and the needs for standards: Education research report. Washington, DC: Office of Research.
Osborne, J., & Collins, S. (2000). Pupils’ and parents’ views of the school science curriculum. London: King’s College London.
Osborne, J., & Simon, S. (1996). Primary science: Past and future directions. Studies in Science Education, 27, 99-147.
Osborne, R. J., & Wittrock, M. C. (1983). Learning science: A generative process. Science Education, 67(4), 489-508.
[Return to Top]
P
Parker, L. H., & Rennie, L. J. (1998). Equitable assessment strategies. In B. J. Fraser & K. G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 897-910). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Parker, L. H., Rennie, L. J., & Harding, J. (1995). Gender Equity. In B. J. Fraser & H. E. Walberg (Eds.), Improving science education (pp. 186-210). New York: National Society for the Study of Education.
Pfundt, H., & Duit, R. (1994). Bibliogaphy: Students’ alternative frameworks and science education (4th ed.). Kiel, Germany: IPN.
Posner, G., Strike, K., Hewson, P., & Gertzog, W. (1982). Accommodation of a science conception: Towards a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66, 211-228.
Preston, B. (1997). Teacher supply and demand to 2003: Projections, implications and issues. Canberra: Australian Council of Deans of Education.
Preston, B. (1998). Teacher supply and demand to 2004. Canberra:Australian Council of Deans of Education.
Prime Minister’s Science, Engineering and Innovation Council. (1999). Ideas for innovation (Occasional Paper Number 2). Canberra: Department of Industry, Science and Resources.
Prime Minister’s Science, Engineering and Innovation Council. (1999). Raising awareness of the importance of science and technology to Australia’s future (Paper prepared by an independent working group for PMSEIC, Agenda Item 3, Fourth meeting—26 November). Canberra: Author.
[Return to Top]
Q R
Queensland School Curriculum Council. (1999). Science: Years 1 to 10 syllabus. Brisbane: Queensland School Curriculum Council.
Reason, P. (1998). Three approaches to participative inquiry. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Strategies of qualitative inquiry. London: Sage.
Rennie, L. J., & Parker, L. H. (2000, April). Toward quality in assessment practice in schools. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
Rennie, L. J., Fraser, B. F., & Treagust, D. F. (1999). Research in science education. In J. P. Keeves & K. Marjoribanks (Eds.), Australian education: Review of research 1965–1998 (pp. 171-203). Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.
Roberts, D. (1982). Developing the concept of “curriculum emphasis”. Science Education, 66, 243-260.
Rosier, M. J., & Banks, D. K. (1990). The scientific literacy of Australian students: Science achievement of students in Australian primary and lower secondary schools: ACER Research Monograph No 59. Hawthorn, Victoria: Australian Council for Educational Research.
[Return to Top]
S
Sadler, D. R. (1987). Specifying and promulgating achievement standards. Oxford Review of Education, 13, 191-209.
Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18, 119-144.
Schmidt, W. H. (1999, October). Focus the high school curriculum. In W. W. Gibbs & D. Fox, The false crisis in science education. Scientific American, pp. 92-93.
Select Committee on Science and Technology. (2000). Science and technology—Third report. London: House of Lords, Science and Technology Committee Publications.
Senate Employment, Education and Training References Committee Inquiry. (1998). A Class Act: Inquiry into the status of the teaching profession. Canberra: Author.
Shamos, B. M. H. (1995). The myth of scientific literacy. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
Smith, B. (2000, May 17). Market sinks postgrads. The Australian: Higher Education Supplement, p. 45.
Solomon, J. (1993). The social construction of children’s scientific knowledge. In P. J. Black & A. M. Lucas (Eds.), The practice of constructivism in science education (pp. 85-101). London: Routledge.
Sparks, D., & Loucks-Horsley, S. (1990). Models of staff development. In W. R. Houston (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 234‑250). New York: Macmillan.
Speedy, G. W., Annice, C., & Fensham, P. J. (1989). Discipline review of teacher education in mathematics and science (Vol. 1). Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.
Speering, W., & Rennie, L. (1996). Students’ perceptions about science: The impact of transition from primary to secondary school. Research in Science Education, 26, 283-298.
Staer, H., Goodrum, D., & Hackling, M. (1998). High school laboratory work in Western Australia: Openness to inquiry. Research in Science Education, 28(2), 219-228.
Sutman, F. X. (1996). Guest editorial: Science literacy: A functional definition. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 459-460.
[Return to Top]
V W Y
Venville, G., Wallace, J., Rennie, L. J., & Malone, J. (1998). The integration of science, mathematics and technology in a discipline-based culture. School Science and Mathematics, 98, 294-302.
White, R. (1991). An overview of the Australasian perspective. In J. Northfield & D. Symington (Eds.), Learning in science viewed as personal construction (Key Centre Monograph No 3, pp. 1-15). Perth: Curtin University of Technology, Key Centre of School Science and Mathematics.
White, R. T., & Gunstone, R. F. (1989). Meta-learning and conceptual change. International Journal of Science Education, 11, 577-586.
White, R., & Gunstone, R. (1992). Probing understanding. London: Falmer Press.
Whitehead, G., Symington, D., Mackay, L., & Vincent, A. (1993). The influence of discipline reviews on higher education—Review of teacher education in mathematics and science. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.
Woolnough, B. E. (1994). Effective science teaching. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Yates, S., & Goodrum, D. (1990). How confident are primary school teachers in teaching science? Research in Science Education, 20, 300-305.